Assessment of Stroke Onset Time Based on DINOv2 Visual Features

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Dr Jin-jin Wang
{"title":"Assessment of Stroke Onset Time Based on DINOv2 Visual Features","authors":"Dr Jin-jin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Currently, the thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) strictly depends on the time since stroke onset (TSS) being less than 4.5 hours. However, some patients are excluded from thrombolytic treatment due to uncertain TSS. Clinically, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch are commonly used to roughly determine TSS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this paper, we propose a method based on DINOv2 to classify the TSS as less than or more than 4.5 hours. We conducted model training and external testing using case data from two hospitals. These hospitals respectively included 226 and 85 cases of TSS less than 4.5 hours, along with an equal number of cases with TSS greater than 4.5 hours. Firstly, we utilized DINOv2 for automatic segmentation of lesions and extraction of visual features from DWI and FLAIR images. Then, the visual features of the lesion area were input into four different machine learning models. Finally, a conclusion on whether the patient's onset time is more or less than 4.5 hours is reached through a weighted voting method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results from the external test set show that in lesion segmentation from DWI and FLAIR images, the Dice coefficients were as high as 0.872 and 0.823, respectively. In the judgment of TTS less than 4.5 hours, our approach achieved an accuracy of 0.865, sensitivity of 0.843, and specificity of 0.902.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The assessment of TTS based on DINOv2 visual features demonstrates excellent performance. The results of this approach significantly surpass those of human doctors using the DWI-FLAIR mismatch method. Moreover, it achieves a fully automated process for rapid and efficient handling. This approach is expected to play a key role in treatment decision-making for patients with unknown TSS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424002108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Currently, the thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) strictly depends on the time since stroke onset (TSS) being less than 4.5 hours. However, some patients are excluded from thrombolytic treatment due to uncertain TSS. Clinically, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch are commonly used to roughly determine TSS.

Methods

In this paper, we propose a method based on DINOv2 to classify the TSS as less than or more than 4.5 hours. We conducted model training and external testing using case data from two hospitals. These hospitals respectively included 226 and 85 cases of TSS less than 4.5 hours, along with an equal number of cases with TSS greater than 4.5 hours. Firstly, we utilized DINOv2 for automatic segmentation of lesions and extraction of visual features from DWI and FLAIR images. Then, the visual features of the lesion area were input into four different machine learning models. Finally, a conclusion on whether the patient's onset time is more or less than 4.5 hours is reached through a weighted voting method.

Results

The results from the external test set show that in lesion segmentation from DWI and FLAIR images, the Dice coefficients were as high as 0.872 and 0.823, respectively. In the judgment of TTS less than 4.5 hours, our approach achieved an accuracy of 0.865, sensitivity of 0.843, and specificity of 0.902.

Conclusion

The assessment of TTS based on DINOv2 visual features demonstrates excellent performance. The results of this approach significantly surpass those of human doctors using the DWI-FLAIR mismatch method. Moreover, it achieves a fully automated process for rapid and efficient handling. This approach is expected to play a key role in treatment decision-making for patients with unknown TSS.
基于 DINOv2 视觉特征的卒中发病时间评估
背景目前,急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的溶栓治疗严格依赖于卒中发生时间(TSS)小于 4.5 小时。然而,一些患者因 TSS 不确定而被排除在溶栓治疗之外。在临床上,弥散加权成像(DWI)和液体增强反转恢复(FLAIR)错配常用于粗略判断 TSS。方法在本文中,我们提出了一种基于 DINOv2 的方法,将 TSS 分为小于或大于 4.5 小时。我们使用两家医院的病例数据进行了模型训练和外部测试。这两家医院分别有 226 例和 85 例 TSS 小于 4.5 小时的病例,以及同等数量的 TSS 大于 4.5 小时的病例。首先,我们利用 DINOv2 自动分割病灶,并从 DWI 和 FLAIR 图像中提取视觉特征。然后,将病变区域的视觉特征输入四个不同的机器学习模型。结果外部测试集的结果显示,在从 DWI 和 FLAIR 图像进行病灶分割时,Dice 系数分别高达 0.872 和 0.823。结论基于 DINOv2 视觉特征的 TTS 评估表现出色。这种方法的结果大大超过了使用 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配方法的人类医生的结果。此外,它还实现了快速高效处理的全自动流程。这种方法有望在未知 TSS 患者的治疗决策中发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信