Hugo Roirand , Anis Hor , Benoit Malard , Nicolas Saintier
{"title":"Fatigue behavior of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: Competition between the effects of defects and microstructure","authors":"Hugo Roirand , Anis Hor , Benoit Malard , Nicolas Saintier","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) process, is becoming more and more widespread in industry. The possibilities of microstructural control offered by this process are an opportunity to study the contribution of the different length scales of microstructure to the fatigue behavior. This paper is devoted to the understanding of this fatigue behavior resulting from the interactions between the process induced defects and the different polycrystal length scales. Two distinct defect − microstructure competition regimes have been identified. The first concerns microstructures containing large Lack of Fusion (LoF) defects. These LoFs drastically reduce the fatigue life, while microstructure has no influence on the fatigue strength. The second regime concerns microstructures containing small defects. A limited effect of the polycrystalline microstructure was revealed. Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that the ratio between damage initiation defect size and grain size, used in literature to describe the defect and microstructure sensitivity of fatigue strength, is not applicable over a wide range of defects and microstructures, such as obtained by additive manufacturing processes. Finally, the comparison between the fatigue behavior of different microstructure and defect features shows that producing a finer microstructure improves fatigue strength despite the presence of a significant defect population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 108658"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112324005176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) process, is becoming more and more widespread in industry. The possibilities of microstructural control offered by this process are an opportunity to study the contribution of the different length scales of microstructure to the fatigue behavior. This paper is devoted to the understanding of this fatigue behavior resulting from the interactions between the process induced defects and the different polycrystal length scales. Two distinct defect − microstructure competition regimes have been identified. The first concerns microstructures containing large Lack of Fusion (LoF) defects. These LoFs drastically reduce the fatigue life, while microstructure has no influence on the fatigue strength. The second regime concerns microstructures containing small defects. A limited effect of the polycrystalline microstructure was revealed. Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that the ratio between damage initiation defect size and grain size, used in literature to describe the defect and microstructure sensitivity of fatigue strength, is not applicable over a wide range of defects and microstructures, such as obtained by additive manufacturing processes. Finally, the comparison between the fatigue behavior of different microstructure and defect features shows that producing a finer microstructure improves fatigue strength despite the presence of a significant defect population.
期刊介绍:
Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address:
Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements)
Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading
Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions
Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions)
Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects
Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue
Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation)
Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering
Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation
Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.