GSOR04 Presentation Time: 5:15 PM

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Memory Fadziso Bvochora-Nsingo Masters in Medicine, Dawn Balang MD
{"title":"GSOR04 Presentation Time: 5:15 PM","authors":"Memory Fadziso Bvochora-Nsingo Masters in Medicine,&nbsp;Dawn Balang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Cervical cancer remains the most prevalent cancer treated in Botswana. With only a single institution offering curative chemoradiation during the pandemic, brachytherapy cases serve as a proxy for all curative interventions.The study examines the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of brachytherapy for cervical cancer in Botswana, emphasizing the challenges posed by lockdowns and restrictions on both local and international travel. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of brachytherapy could mirror disruptions faced by other cancer treatments due to regional lockdowns and centralized treatment modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A longitudinal analysis of brachytherapy cases from 2018 to 2023 was conducted, with a particular focus on the trend changes coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collated from hospital records, maintenance logs for medical equipment, national cancer registries, and pandemic response documentation. The analysis explored the correlation between pandemic-related restrictions and the accessibility of brachytherapy services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 2499 brachytherapy insertions done in the six years between 2018 and 2023 only 110 insertions (4.5%) were done in 2020 and 238 (9.5%) in 2021, the peak COVID years. Fig 1 illustrates the pandemic's impact on brachytherapy services in Botswana.The one-way ANOVA conducted to compare the mean number of brachytherapy insertions before(2018 to 2019), during (2020 to 2021), and after (2022 to 2023) the pandemic yields an F-statistic of approximately 33.837 and a p-value of approximately 0.0087, suggesting that there is a statistically significant difference in the number of brachytherapy insertions among at least two of the three periods compared. The analysis highlights a severe reduction in brachytherapy treatments in 2020 and 2021. This period coincides with a gorvenrment lockdown beginning in April 2020, with subsequent regional lockdowns and quarantine of both healthcare workers and patients. There was a three-month breakdown of the single linear accelerator at the nation's primary cancer treatment center, attributable to the absence of engineers from South Africa who were unable to travel due to lockdowns. Additionally, the expiry of the Ir192 source, essential for brachytherapy and challenging to replace due to its short half-life of 174 days, led to a six-month cessation of services. This was compounded by regulatory complexities and the dependence on international engineers for both source replacement and equipment servicing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted brachytherapy services for cervical cancer, reflective of broader oncological treatment challenges during this period. It exposed vulnerabilities in Botswana's cancer treatment infrastructure, particularly the risk associated with using a short-lived isotope like Ir192 in a country dependent on international support. The situation advocates for the consideration of longer-half-life sources such as Cobalt 60, which could offer more resilience for healthcare systems in similar contexts. However, the recovery trajectory post-2021 highlights the healthcare system's adaptability and the critical importance of maintaining cancer treatment services during global crises. Future strategies should focus on resilient healthcare structures to withstand similar disruptions, ensuring uninterrupted cancer care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472124001867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Cervical cancer remains the most prevalent cancer treated in Botswana. With only a single institution offering curative chemoradiation during the pandemic, brachytherapy cases serve as a proxy for all curative interventions.The study examines the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of brachytherapy for cervical cancer in Botswana, emphasizing the challenges posed by lockdowns and restrictions on both local and international travel. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of brachytherapy could mirror disruptions faced by other cancer treatments due to regional lockdowns and centralized treatment modalities.

Materials and Methods

A longitudinal analysis of brachytherapy cases from 2018 to 2023 was conducted, with a particular focus on the trend changes coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collated from hospital records, maintenance logs for medical equipment, national cancer registries, and pandemic response documentation. The analysis explored the correlation between pandemic-related restrictions and the accessibility of brachytherapy services.

Results

Of the 2499 brachytherapy insertions done in the six years between 2018 and 2023 only 110 insertions (4.5%) were done in 2020 and 238 (9.5%) in 2021, the peak COVID years. Fig 1 illustrates the pandemic's impact on brachytherapy services in Botswana.The one-way ANOVA conducted to compare the mean number of brachytherapy insertions before(2018 to 2019), during (2020 to 2021), and after (2022 to 2023) the pandemic yields an F-statistic of approximately 33.837 and a p-value of approximately 0.0087, suggesting that there is a statistically significant difference in the number of brachytherapy insertions among at least two of the three periods compared. The analysis highlights a severe reduction in brachytherapy treatments in 2020 and 2021. This period coincides with a gorvenrment lockdown beginning in April 2020, with subsequent regional lockdowns and quarantine of both healthcare workers and patients. There was a three-month breakdown of the single linear accelerator at the nation's primary cancer treatment center, attributable to the absence of engineers from South Africa who were unable to travel due to lockdowns. Additionally, the expiry of the Ir192 source, essential for brachytherapy and challenging to replace due to its short half-life of 174 days, led to a six-month cessation of services. This was compounded by regulatory complexities and the dependence on international engineers for both source replacement and equipment servicing.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted brachytherapy services for cervical cancer, reflective of broader oncological treatment challenges during this period. It exposed vulnerabilities in Botswana's cancer treatment infrastructure, particularly the risk associated with using a short-lived isotope like Ir192 in a country dependent on international support. The situation advocates for the consideration of longer-half-life sources such as Cobalt 60, which could offer more resilience for healthcare systems in similar contexts. However, the recovery trajectory post-2021 highlights the healthcare system's adaptability and the critical importance of maintaining cancer treatment services during global crises. Future strategies should focus on resilient healthcare structures to withstand similar disruptions, ensuring uninterrupted cancer care.
GSOR04 演讲时间:下午 5:15
目的 在博茨瓦纳,宫颈癌仍然是发病率最高的癌症。本研究探讨了 COVID-19 大流行对博茨瓦纳宫颈癌近距离放射治疗的影响,强调了封锁和限制本地及国际旅行所带来的挑战。COVID-19大流行对近距离治疗连续性的影响可能与其他癌症治疗因地区封锁和集中治疗模式而面临的中断情况如出一辙。材料与方法对2018年至2023年的近距离治疗病例进行了纵向分析,尤其关注与COVID-19大流行同时发生的趋势变化。数据来自医院记录、医疗设备维护日志、国家癌症登记处和大流行应对文件。分析探讨了大流行相关限制与近距离放射治疗服务可及性之间的相关性。结果 在 2018 年至 2023 年的六年间完成的 2499 例近距离放射治疗插入手术中,只有 110 例(4.5%)是在 2020 年完成的,238 例(9.5%)是在 2021 年完成的,即 COVID 高峰年。图 1 说明了大流行对博茨瓦纳近距离治疗服务的影响。为比较大流行前(2018 年至 2019 年)、大流行期间(2020 年至 2021 年)和大流行后(2022 年至 2023 年)近距离治疗插入的平均次数而进行的单因素方差分析得出的 F 统计量约为 33.837,P 值约为 0.0087,表明在三个比较时段中,至少有两个时段的近距离放射治疗插入数量存在显著的统计学差异。分析结果表明,2020 年和 2021 年近距离放射治疗次数将大幅减少。这一时期恰逢 2020 年 4 月开始的政府封锁,以及随后的地区封锁和对医护人员和患者的隔离。国家主要癌症治疗中心的单台直线加速器出现了长达三个月的故障,原因是来自南非的工程师因封锁而无法前往。此外,近距离放射治疗所必需的 Ir192 放射源因半衰期短(174 天)而难以更换,其过期导致服务中断 6 个月。复杂的监管问题以及在放射源更换和设备维修方面对国际工程师的依赖使问题变得更加复杂。 结论 COVID-19 大流行严重扰乱了宫颈癌近距离治疗服务,反映了这一时期更广泛的肿瘤治疗挑战。它暴露了博茨瓦纳癌症治疗基础设施的薄弱环节,尤其是在一个依赖国际支持的国家使用 Ir192 这种短效同位素所带来的风险。这种情况主张考虑使用钴 60 等半衰期较长的同位素,因为在类似情况下,钴 60 可以为医疗系统提供更强的复原力。不过,2021 年后的恢复轨迹凸显了医疗系统的适应能力,以及在全球危机期间维持癌症治疗服务的极端重要性。未来的战略应侧重于有弹性的医疗保健结构,以抵御类似的干扰,确保不间断的癌症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy 医学-核医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
9.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Brachytherapy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed articles and selected reviews on the techniques and clinical applications of interstitial and intracavitary radiation in the management of cancers. Laboratory and experimental research relevant to clinical practice is also included. Related disciplines include medical physics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology and radiology. Brachytherapy publishes technical advances, original articles, reviews, and point/counterpoint on controversial issues. Original articles that address any aspect of brachytherapy are invited. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信