Poverty porn or poverty planning? Slum photography and the politics of spatial representation

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Ashish Makanadar , Elmond Bandauko
{"title":"Poverty porn or poverty planning? Slum photography and the politics of spatial representation","authors":"Ashish Makanadar ,&nbsp;Elmond Bandauko","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This forum article critically examines the politics of visual representation in urban informality, interrogating the genealogies and contemporary manifestations of what we term the “slum gaze.” Drawing on postcolonial theory, feminist visual studies, and critical urban geography, we trace how colonial visualities continue to shape aesthetic constructions of urban marginality through “poverty porn” and spectacles of abjection. We argue that dominant visual regimes not only reflect but actively produce urban informality as a pathologized state of being, rationalizing dispossessive planning interventions while obscuring subaltern spatial knowledges and practices. The article unpacks the contradictory role of visuality in urban planning and policymaking, where GIS mappings and documentary photography paradoxically render informal settlements simultaneously hyper-visible and illegible to state bureaucracies. Against reductive visual grammars inherited from colonial modernity, we advocate for participatory visual methodologies that amplify resident-driven representational practices. By centering community-based visual epistemologies, we gesture toward more emancipatory modes of seeing and narrating the heterogeneous spaces of urban informality. Ultimately, this intervention calls for a paradigmatic shift in how urban scholars and practitioners engage visually with marginalized communities. We contend that cultivating critical visual literacies attuned to the politics of representation is essential for imagining and enacting more just urban futures. This requires moving beyond simplistic denunciations of “poverty porn” toward a praxis of critical visuality that unsettles universalizing gazes while legitimizing plural ways of seeing, knowing, and inhabiting the city.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This forum article critically examines the politics of visual representation in urban informality, interrogating the genealogies and contemporary manifestations of what we term the “slum gaze.” Drawing on postcolonial theory, feminist visual studies, and critical urban geography, we trace how colonial visualities continue to shape aesthetic constructions of urban marginality through “poverty porn” and spectacles of abjection. We argue that dominant visual regimes not only reflect but actively produce urban informality as a pathologized state of being, rationalizing dispossessive planning interventions while obscuring subaltern spatial knowledges and practices. The article unpacks the contradictory role of visuality in urban planning and policymaking, where GIS mappings and documentary photography paradoxically render informal settlements simultaneously hyper-visible and illegible to state bureaucracies. Against reductive visual grammars inherited from colonial modernity, we advocate for participatory visual methodologies that amplify resident-driven representational practices. By centering community-based visual epistemologies, we gesture toward more emancipatory modes of seeing and narrating the heterogeneous spaces of urban informality. Ultimately, this intervention calls for a paradigmatic shift in how urban scholars and practitioners engage visually with marginalized communities. We contend that cultivating critical visual literacies attuned to the politics of representation is essential for imagining and enacting more just urban futures. This requires moving beyond simplistic denunciations of “poverty porn” toward a praxis of critical visuality that unsettles universalizing gazes while legitimizing plural ways of seeing, knowing, and inhabiting the city.
贫穷色情还是贫穷规划?贫民窟摄影与空间表现政治
这篇论坛文章批判性地研究了城市非正规性中的视觉表现政治,探讨了我们所称的 "贫民窟凝视 "的谱系和当代表现形式。借鉴后殖民理论、女权主义视觉研究和批判性城市地理学,我们追溯了殖民视觉如何通过 "贫困色情 "和 "憎恶 "景象继续塑造城市边缘性的审美建构。我们认为,占主导地位的视觉制度不仅反映了城市非正规性,而且积极地将其作为一种病理化的存在状态,使剥夺性的规划干预合理化,同时掩盖了次等空间知识和实践。文章揭示了视觉性在城市规划和政策制定中的矛盾作用,地理信息系统地图和纪实摄影自相矛盾地使非正规住区在国家官僚机构眼中同时具有超可见性和不可辨识性。针对殖民现代性遗留下来的还原性视觉语法,我们主张采用参与式视觉方法,扩大居民驱动的表征实践。通过以社区为中心的视觉认识论,我们提出了一种更具解放性的模式来看待和叙述城市非正规性的异质空间。最终,这一干预呼吁城市学者和实践者在如何以视觉方式参与边缘化社区方面进行范式转变。我们认为,培养与表征政治相适应的批判性视觉素养,对于想象和实现更加公正的城市未来至关重要。这就要求超越对 "贫穷色情 "的简单谴责,转向批判性视觉实践,这种实践既能打破普遍化的凝视,又能使观看、了解和居住城市的多元方式合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信