Teamwork enhances patient experience: linking TEAM and Net Promoter Scores.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amy Nguyen Howell, Jacqueline Ruffing, Omid Ameli, Christine E Chaisson, Dawn Webster, Sara Poplau, Erin Sullivan, Martin Stillman, Mark Linzer
{"title":"Teamwork enhances patient experience: linking TEAM and Net Promoter Scores.","authors":"Amy Nguyen Howell, Jacqueline Ruffing, Omid Ameli, Christine E Chaisson, Dawn Webster, Sara Poplau, Erin Sullivan, Martin Stillman, Mark Linzer","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously described a 6-item teamwork index (TEAM) with a strong relationship to provider experience, lower burnout, and intent to stay. We now sought to determine whether (1) TEAM relates to higher patient Net Promoter Score (NPS, or likelihood of patient referring to the organization) and (2) teamwork mediates a provider experience-NPS relationship.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A provider wellness survey was administered in the fall of 2019 in 6 care delivery organizations (CDOs) with patient NPS data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measures included a validated burnout item, 6-item TEAM measure, provider experience metric, standard intent-to-stay question, and NPS data from 79,254 patients matched to CDO. Regression analyses modeled relationships among TEAM, provider experience, and NPS. Open-ended comments were reviewed to confirm patient NPS findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1386 provider respondents (53% physicians, 47% advanced practice clinicians, 58% female, 62% White, 58% in primary care; response rate, 55.7%). Median NPS was 83%. TEAM was associated with patient NPS greater than the median (53% with high TEAM and high NPS vs 44% with low TEAM and high NPS; P < .001), as was provider experience (52% vs 45%; P < .05). In regression analyses, patient NPS was strongly related to TEAM (adjusted OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25-1.60; P < .001). The provider experience-patient NPS relationship was partly mediated by TEAM. Open-ended comments confirmed positive or negative sentiments related to NPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teamwork and provider experience relate to patient NPS, and the provider experience-NPS relationship appears to be mediated by teamwork.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We previously described a 6-item teamwork index (TEAM) with a strong relationship to provider experience, lower burnout, and intent to stay. We now sought to determine whether (1) TEAM relates to higher patient Net Promoter Score (NPS, or likelihood of patient referring to the organization) and (2) teamwork mediates a provider experience-NPS relationship.

Study design: A provider wellness survey was administered in the fall of 2019 in 6 care delivery organizations (CDOs) with patient NPS data.

Methods: Measures included a validated burnout item, 6-item TEAM measure, provider experience metric, standard intent-to-stay question, and NPS data from 79,254 patients matched to CDO. Regression analyses modeled relationships among TEAM, provider experience, and NPS. Open-ended comments were reviewed to confirm patient NPS findings.

Results: There were 1386 provider respondents (53% physicians, 47% advanced practice clinicians, 58% female, 62% White, 58% in primary care; response rate, 55.7%). Median NPS was 83%. TEAM was associated with patient NPS greater than the median (53% with high TEAM and high NPS vs 44% with low TEAM and high NPS; P < .001), as was provider experience (52% vs 45%; P < .05). In regression analyses, patient NPS was strongly related to TEAM (adjusted OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25-1.60; P < .001). The provider experience-patient NPS relationship was partly mediated by TEAM. Open-ended comments confirmed positive or negative sentiments related to NPS.

Conclusions: Teamwork and provider experience relate to patient NPS, and the provider experience-NPS relationship appears to be mediated by teamwork.

团队合作提升患者体验:将 TEAM 和净促进者得分联系起来。
目标:我们以前曾描述过一种 6 项团队合作指数(TEAM),它与医疗服务提供者的体验、较低的职业倦怠和留任意愿有密切关系。现在,我们试图确定:(1)TEAM 是否与较高的患者净促进者得分(NPS,即患者向医疗机构推荐的可能性)有关;(2)团队合作是否在医疗服务提供者体验与 NPS 关系之间起到中介作用:研究设计:2019 年秋季,在 6 家提供患者 NPS 数据的医疗机构(CDO)中开展了医疗服务提供者健康调查:研究措施包括一个经过验证的职业倦怠项目、6 个项目的 TEAM 测量、医疗服务提供者体验指标、标准逗留意向问题,以及与 CDO 匹配的 79,254 名患者的 NPS 数据。回归分析模拟了 TEAM、医疗服务提供者经验和 NPS 之间的关系。对开放式评论进行了审查,以确认患者 NPS 的调查结果:共有 1386 名医疗服务提供者(53% 为内科医生,47% 为高级临床医生,58% 为女性,62% 为白人,58% 为初级保健医生;回复率为 55.7%)做出了回复。NPS 中位数为 83%。团队合作与患者 NPS 高于中位数有关(高团队合作和高 NPS 的比例为 53% vs 低团队合作和高 NPS 的比例为 44%;P 结论:团队合作和医疗服务提供者经验与患者 NPS 有关,医疗服务提供者经验与 NPS 的关系似乎受团队合作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信