Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Accurate Classification of Myofibroblastic Lesions on Patch-Based Images.

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Daniela Giraldo-Roldán, Giovanna Calabrese Dos Santos, Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo, Thaís Cerqueira Reis Nakamura, Katya Pulido-Díaz, Marcio Ajudarte Lopes, Alan Roger Santos-Silva, Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Matheus Cardoso Moraes, Pablo Agustin Vargas
{"title":"Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Accurate Classification of Myofibroblastic Lesions on Patch-Based Images.","authors":"Daniela Giraldo-Roldán, Giovanna Calabrese Dos Santos, Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo, Thaís Cerqueira Reis Nakamura, Katya Pulido-Díaz, Marcio Ajudarte Lopes, Alan Roger Santos-Silva, Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Matheus Cardoso Moraes, Pablo Agustin Vargas","doi":"10.1007/s12105-024-01723-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to implement and evaluate a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for classifying myofibroblastic lesions into benign and malignant categories based on patch-based images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Residual Neural Network (ResNet50) model, pre-trained with weights from ImageNet, was fine-tuned to classify a cohort of 20 patients (11 benign and 9 malignant cases). Following annotation of tumor regions, the whole-slide images (WSIs) were fragmented into smaller patches (224 × 224 pixels). These patches were non-randomly divided into training (308,843 patches), validation (43,268 patches), and test (42,061 patches) subsets, maintaining a 78:11:11 ratio. The CNN training was caried out for 75 epochs utilizing a batch size of 4, the Adam optimizer, and a learning rate of 0.00001.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ResNet50 achieved an accuracy of 98.97%, precision of 99.91%, sensitivity of 97.98%, specificity of 99.91%, F1 score of 98.94%, and AUC of 0.99.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ResNet50 model developed exhibited high accuracy during training and robust generalization capabilities in unseen data, indicating nearly flawless performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant myofibroblastic tumors, despite the small sample size. The excellent performance of the AI model in separating such histologically similar classes could be attributed to its ability to identify hidden discriminative features, as well as to use a wide range of features and benefit from proper data preprocessing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":"18 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01723-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to implement and evaluate a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for classifying myofibroblastic lesions into benign and malignant categories based on patch-based images.

Methods: A Residual Neural Network (ResNet50) model, pre-trained with weights from ImageNet, was fine-tuned to classify a cohort of 20 patients (11 benign and 9 malignant cases). Following annotation of tumor regions, the whole-slide images (WSIs) were fragmented into smaller patches (224 × 224 pixels). These patches were non-randomly divided into training (308,843 patches), validation (43,268 patches), and test (42,061 patches) subsets, maintaining a 78:11:11 ratio. The CNN training was caried out for 75 epochs utilizing a batch size of 4, the Adam optimizer, and a learning rate of 0.00001.

Results: ResNet50 achieved an accuracy of 98.97%, precision of 99.91%, sensitivity of 97.98%, specificity of 99.91%, F1 score of 98.94%, and AUC of 0.99.

Conclusions: The ResNet50 model developed exhibited high accuracy during training and robust generalization capabilities in unseen data, indicating nearly flawless performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant myofibroblastic tumors, despite the small sample size. The excellent performance of the AI model in separating such histologically similar classes could be attributed to its ability to identify hidden discriminative features, as well as to use a wide range of features and benefit from proper data preprocessing.

基于斑块图像的深度卷积神经网络对肌成纤维细胞病变的准确分类
研究目的本研究旨在实施和评估一种深度卷积神经网络,根据基于斑块的图像将肌成纤维细胞病变分为良性和恶性类别:使用 ImageNet 的权重预训练残差神经网络 (ResNet50) 模型,并对其进行微调,以对 20 例患者(11 例良性病例和 9 例恶性病例)进行分类。在对肿瘤区域进行标注后,整张幻灯片图像(WSI)被分割成更小的片段(224 × 224 像素)。这些片段被非随机地分为训练(308843 个片段)、验证(43268 个片段)和测试(42061 个片段)子集,保持 78:11:11 的比例。利用 4 个批次、Adam 优化器和 0.00001 的学习率,对 CNN 进行了 75 个历元的训练:结果:ResNet50 的准确度为 98.97%,精确度为 99.91%,灵敏度为 97.98%,特异度为 99.91%,F1 分数为 98.94%,AUC 为 0.99:尽管样本量较小,但所开发的 ResNet50 模型在训练过程中表现出了很高的准确性,并在未见数据中表现出了强大的泛化能力,这表明该模型在区分良性和恶性肌成纤维细胞肿瘤方面的表现几乎完美无瑕。人工智能模型在区分此类组织学相似类别方面的出色表现可归功于其识别隐藏的判别特征的能力,以及使用广泛特征的能力,并受益于适当的数据预处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信