[Challenges and good practices of regional hospice and palliative care networks in Germany: Results of an online survey].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sven Schwabe, Hanna A A Röwer, Franziska A Herbst
{"title":"[Challenges and good practices of regional hospice and palliative care networks in Germany: Results of an online survey].","authors":"Sven Schwabe, Hanna A A Röwer, Franziska A Herbst","doi":"10.1055/a-2452-9723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regional hospice and palliative care networks (RHPCN) can help improve collaboration between health care providers in order to provide comprehensive care for seriously ill patients and their families in the last stages of life. In Germany, RHPCNs are eligible for funding by statutory health insurers from 2022 under Section 39 d SGB V. What are the challenges RHCPNs face and what good practices have emerged in their work?As part of the project HOPAN (German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee [G-BA], grant N° 01VSF22042), an online survey was conducted among RHPCNs in Germany between December 2023 and February 2024. The survey explored challenges and good practices in six areas of network work. Quantitative data was analysed using a frequency analysis with the statistical software SPSS (closed questions). Free text answers were openly coded using MAXQDA 2022.A total response rate of n=408 data sets was achieved, of which n=64 data sets were included in the analysis after plausibility checks and data cleaning. The most significant challenges facing RHPCNs were the lack of awareness of the network among the general public (n=39; 60.9%) and care providers (n=27; 42.2%), varying qualifications and quality standards of network partners (n=31; 48.2%), and acquisition of new network partners (n=27; 42.2%). The most frequently mentioned good practices were appreciative, transparent, and regular communication (n=41; 50.6%), a personal approach to new network partners (n=38; 28.3%), and attractive network activities (n=33; 25.2%).Many RHPCNs are currently encountering challenges in establishing and expanding their network infrastructure. The implementation of effective network moderation and delivery of high-quality network activities can enhance the reach of RHPCNs. Joint training and further education, in addition to the development of regional care practices and standards, require a high level of commitment from the network partners, which is not yet the case in many instances.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2452-9723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regional hospice and palliative care networks (RHPCN) can help improve collaboration between health care providers in order to provide comprehensive care for seriously ill patients and their families in the last stages of life. In Germany, RHPCNs are eligible for funding by statutory health insurers from 2022 under Section 39 d SGB V. What are the challenges RHCPNs face and what good practices have emerged in their work?As part of the project HOPAN (German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee [G-BA], grant N° 01VSF22042), an online survey was conducted among RHPCNs in Germany between December 2023 and February 2024. The survey explored challenges and good practices in six areas of network work. Quantitative data was analysed using a frequency analysis with the statistical software SPSS (closed questions). Free text answers were openly coded using MAXQDA 2022.A total response rate of n=408 data sets was achieved, of which n=64 data sets were included in the analysis after plausibility checks and data cleaning. The most significant challenges facing RHPCNs were the lack of awareness of the network among the general public (n=39; 60.9%) and care providers (n=27; 42.2%), varying qualifications and quality standards of network partners (n=31; 48.2%), and acquisition of new network partners (n=27; 42.2%). The most frequently mentioned good practices were appreciative, transparent, and regular communication (n=41; 50.6%), a personal approach to new network partners (n=38; 28.3%), and attractive network activities (n=33; 25.2%).Many RHPCNs are currently encountering challenges in establishing and expanding their network infrastructure. The implementation of effective network moderation and delivery of high-quality network activities can enhance the reach of RHPCNs. Joint training and further education, in addition to the development of regional care practices and standards, require a high level of commitment from the network partners, which is not yet the case in many instances.

德国地区临终关怀与姑息关怀网络的挑战与良好实践:在线调查结果。
区域临终关怀和姑息治疗网络(RHPCN)可以帮助改善卫生保健提供者之间的协作,以便在生命的最后阶段为重病患者及其家属提供全面的护理。在德国,根据SGB V.第39d节,从2022年起,rhpcn有资格获得法定医疗保险公司的资助。rhpcn面临哪些挑战?他们的工作中出现了哪些良好做法?作为HOPAN(德国联邦联合委员会创新基金[G-BA],拨款N°01VSF22042)项目的一部分,在2023年12月至2024年2月期间在德国rhpcn中进行了一项在线调查。调查探讨了网络工作六个领域的挑战和良好做法。定量数据采用SPSS(封闭式问题)统计软件进行频率分析。使用MAXQDA 2022公开编码免费文本答案。总有效率为n=408个数据集,其中经过信度检验和数据清洗后纳入分析的数据集为n=64个。rhpcn面临的最重大挑战是公众对网络缺乏认识(n=39;60.9%)和护理人员(n=27;42.2%),网络合作伙伴的资质和质量标准不同(n=31;48.2%),以及获得新的网络合作伙伴(n=27;42.2%)。最常提到的良好实践是赞赏、透明和定期沟通(n=41;50.6%),以个人方式寻找新的网络伙伴(n=38;28.3%),吸引人的网络活动(n=33;25.2%)。目前,许多rhpcn在建立和扩展其网络基础设施方面遇到了挑战。实现有效的网络调节和交付高质量的网络活动可以增强rhpcn的覆盖范围。除了制定区域护理做法和标准外,联合培训和继续教育还需要网络伙伴的高度承诺,但在许多情况下还没有做到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信