Effect on ventilation of carbon dioxide delivered in early inspiration in man.

A R Cummin, C P Patil, M S Jacobi, K B Saunders
{"title":"Effect on ventilation of carbon dioxide delivered in early inspiration in man.","authors":"A R Cummin,&nbsp;C P Patil,&nbsp;M S Jacobi,&nbsp;K B Saunders","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Four subjects breathed an air-CO2 mixture, obtained by injecting pure CO2 0.4 l.min-1 into the inspiratory line of an open breathing circuit. The effects of injecting CO2 directly into the tubing (Fenn-Craig technique, FC), with a resulting large CO2 bolus in early inspiration, were compared with those of injecting into a mixing chamber (MC) and thus spreading the CO2 load more evenly over inspiration. Ensemble averaging of three experiments for MC and FC in each subject was used to clarify the relatively small changes in ventilation (V), about 5 l.min-1, and end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2), about 5 mmHg, which were produced by the stimulus. Change in V and in PETCO2 were both systematically less for MC than FC, by about 1 l.min-1 and 0.5 to 1 mmHg respectively, suggesting that the CO2 load to the alveoli was larger for FC, with V then appropriately higher by the normal CO2 response. The increased CO2 load in FC could be accounted for by the lower proportion of CO2 left in the dead space, compared to MC. Thus, in man breathing air, no systematic effect on CO2 sensitivity was produced by an early inspiratory bolus of CO2.</p>","PeriodicalId":75642,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire","volume":"23 4","pages":"335-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Four subjects breathed an air-CO2 mixture, obtained by injecting pure CO2 0.4 l.min-1 into the inspiratory line of an open breathing circuit. The effects of injecting CO2 directly into the tubing (Fenn-Craig technique, FC), with a resulting large CO2 bolus in early inspiration, were compared with those of injecting into a mixing chamber (MC) and thus spreading the CO2 load more evenly over inspiration. Ensemble averaging of three experiments for MC and FC in each subject was used to clarify the relatively small changes in ventilation (V), about 5 l.min-1, and end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2), about 5 mmHg, which were produced by the stimulus. Change in V and in PETCO2 were both systematically less for MC than FC, by about 1 l.min-1 and 0.5 to 1 mmHg respectively, suggesting that the CO2 load to the alveoli was larger for FC, with V then appropriately higher by the normal CO2 response. The increased CO2 load in FC could be accounted for by the lower proportion of CO2 left in the dead space, compared to MC. Thus, in man breathing air, no systematic effect on CO2 sensitivity was produced by an early inspiratory bolus of CO2.

人类早期吸入二氧化碳对通气的影响。
四名受试者吸入空气-二氧化碳混合物,将纯二氧化碳0.4 l.min-1注入开放呼吸回路的吸气线。将二氧化碳直接注入管道(Fenn-Craig技术,FC)的效果与注入混合室(MC)的效果进行了比较,后者在早期吸入时产生了大量二氧化碳,从而在吸入时更均匀地分散了二氧化碳负荷。对每个受试者的MC和FC的三个实验进行集合平均,以澄清刺激产生的相对较小的通气(V)变化(约5 l.min-1)和末潮PCO2 (PETCO2)变化(约5 mmHg)。MC的V和PETCO2变化均小于FC,分别减少约1 l.min-1和0.5 ~ 1 mmHg,这表明FC对肺泡的CO2负荷更大,而V则因正常的CO2响应而相应增加。与MC相比,FC中CO2负荷的增加可以解释为死区中CO2的残留比例较低。因此,在呼吸空气的人体中,早期吸入CO2不会对CO2敏感性产生系统性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信