Real-World Experience with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s40261-024-01397-5
Clara Aguirre, Ana Alonso-Torres, Eduardo Agüera, José Manuel García-Domínguez, Paloma Montero-Escribano, Vicente González-Quintanilla, Lucienne Costa-Frossard, Celia Oreja-Guevara, Virginia Reyes-Garrido, Ana Belén Caminero-Rodríguez, Javier Riancho, Octavio Sánchez, Lucía Forero, Fernando Pérez-Parra, Adrián Ares-Luque, Nieves Téllez, Joaquín Arzalluz-Luque, Federico Iglesias, Virginia Casado-Ruiz, Alberto José Castellano-Vicente, Laura Borrega, Victoria Galán, Luis A Rodríguez de Antonio, Carlos Romero, Raquel García-Rodríguez, Antonio Tomás Cano-Orgaz, José Luis Sánchez-Menoyo, Domingo Pérez-Ruiz, Fuencisla Gutiérrez-Martin, Luis Hernández-Echevarría, Virginia Meca-Lallana
{"title":"Real-World Experience with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Clara Aguirre, Ana Alonso-Torres, Eduardo Agüera, José Manuel García-Domínguez, Paloma Montero-Escribano, Vicente González-Quintanilla, Lucienne Costa-Frossard, Celia Oreja-Guevara, Virginia Reyes-Garrido, Ana Belén Caminero-Rodríguez, Javier Riancho, Octavio Sánchez, Lucía Forero, Fernando Pérez-Parra, Adrián Ares-Luque, Nieves Téllez, Joaquín Arzalluz-Luque, Federico Iglesias, Virginia Casado-Ruiz, Alberto José Castellano-Vicente, Laura Borrega, Victoria Galán, Luis A Rodríguez de Antonio, Carlos Romero, Raquel García-Rodríguez, Antonio Tomás Cano-Orgaz, José Luis Sánchez-Menoyo, Domingo Pérez-Ruiz, Fuencisla Gutiérrez-Martin, Luis Hernández-Echevarría, Virginia Meca-Lallana","doi":"10.1007/s40261-024-01397-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current literature and a real-world study suggest that diroximel fumarate (DRF) is safer than dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, no real-world study to date has significantly addressed the efficacy of this treatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to elucidate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DRF in a real-world setting, utilizing data from a Spanish national registry of patients commencing DRF therapy post-market introduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, prospective observational study, data were collected from MS patients who initiated DRF treatment. The study monitored demographic and clinical characteristics, safety outcomes (including adverse events, reasons for discontinuation, and lymphocyte counts), and efficacy outcomes (radiological and clinical activity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 195 MS patients across 26 neurological departments were included, predominantly female (79.5%), with a mean age of 42.17 years, and a mean duration of treatment with DRF of 6.3 months. Most patients (70.3%) reported no adverse events, while gastrointestinal issues and flushing were the most common adverse events observed. The majority of patients (84.6%) continued with DRF treatment, with tolerability issues being the primary reason for discontinuation. Efficacy analysis showed low relapse rates post-DRF initiation, with most patients exhibiting stable or improved Expanded Disability Status Scale scores and radiological assessments demonstrating minimal activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the real-world application of DRF, confirming its safety and tolerability while offering preliminary evidence of its efficacy in managing MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"829-838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01397-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current literature and a real-world study suggest that diroximel fumarate (DRF) is safer than dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, no real-world study to date has significantly addressed the efficacy of this treatment.

Objectives: This study aims to elucidate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DRF in a real-world setting, utilizing data from a Spanish national registry of patients commencing DRF therapy post-market introduction.

Methods: In this multicenter, prospective observational study, data were collected from MS patients who initiated DRF treatment. The study monitored demographic and clinical characteristics, safety outcomes (including adverse events, reasons for discontinuation, and lymphocyte counts), and efficacy outcomes (radiological and clinical activity).

Results: A total of 195 MS patients across 26 neurological departments were included, predominantly female (79.5%), with a mean age of 42.17 years, and a mean duration of treatment with DRF of 6.3 months. Most patients (70.3%) reported no adverse events, while gastrointestinal issues and flushing were the most common adverse events observed. The majority of patients (84.6%) continued with DRF treatment, with tolerability issues being the primary reason for discontinuation. Efficacy analysis showed low relapse rates post-DRF initiation, with most patients exhibiting stable or improved Expanded Disability Status Scale scores and radiological assessments demonstrating minimal activity.

Conclusion: This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the real-world application of DRF, confirming its safety and tolerability while offering preliminary evidence of its efficacy in managing MS.

多发性硬化症患者使用富马酸双嘧达莫的实际体验:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
背景:现有文献和一项实际研究表明,在治疗多发性硬化症(MS)时,富马酸双羟萘胺(DRF)比富马酸二甲酯(DMF)更安全。然而,迄今为止还没有一项真实世界研究对该疗法的疗效进行过深入探讨:本研究旨在阐明 DRF 在真实世界环境中的安全性、耐受性和疗效,利用的数据来自西班牙国家登记处,该登记处登记了 DRF 上市后开始治疗的患者:在这项多中心前瞻性观察研究中,收集了开始接受 DRF 治疗的多发性硬化症患者的数据。研究监测了人口统计学和临床特征、安全性结果(包括不良事件、停药原因和淋巴细胞计数)以及疗效结果(放射学和临床活动):26个神经科共纳入195名多发性硬化症患者,其中以女性为主(79.5%),平均年龄为42.17岁,接受DRF治疗的平均时间为6.3个月。大多数患者(70.3%)未报告不良反应,而胃肠道问题和潮红是最常见的不良反应。大多数患者(84.6%)继续接受 DRF 治疗,耐受性问题是患者中断治疗的主要原因。疗效分析表明,DRF治疗后的复发率较低,大多数患者的残疾状况扩展量表评分稳定或有所改善,放射学评估显示活动性极小:这项综合分析为 DRF 在现实世界中的应用提供了有价值的见解,证实了 DRF 的安全性和耐受性,同时也为 DRF 治疗多发性硬化症的疗效提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信