Estimated glomerular filtration rate versus creatinine clearance to determine anticoagulant dosage after lower-limb orthopedic surgery.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s10157-024-02580-w
Kozo Watanabe, Hiroki Hasegawa, Jun Katoh, Yutaka Hayashi, Isaku Saku, Kazunori Ohshima, Akira Hishida, George Seki, Naoki Ikegaya
{"title":"Estimated glomerular filtration rate versus creatinine clearance to determine anticoagulant dosage after lower-limb orthopedic surgery.","authors":"Kozo Watanabe, Hiroki Hasegawa, Jun Katoh, Yutaka Hayashi, Isaku Saku, Kazunori Ohshima, Akira Hishida, George Seki, Naoki Ikegaya","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02580-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anticoagulation is recommended for thromboprophylaxis after lower-limb orthopedic surgery. The suggested dosage is based on creatinine clearance (CCr) in the labels. However, most facilities only provide estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as laboratory data. Because the eGFR equation adjusts for a body surface area (BSA) of 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, it may overestimate renal function in patients with a small BSA. This retrospective study aimed to determine whether different renal function estimation formulas affect the incidences of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding when determining anticoagulant dosages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent lower-limb orthopedic surgery and received anticoagulants (edoxaban, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux) between 2017 and 2020 at Yaizu City Hospital. Anticoagulant dosing was evaluated using CCr, eGFR, and de-indexed eGFR (without correction for BSA), and the incidences of VTE and bleeding were compared among these formulas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median values for BSA, CCr, eGFR, and de-indexed eGFR were 1.40 m<sup>2</sup>, 56.0 mL/min, 73.0 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>, and 60.9 mL/min, respectively. There was no significant difference in the VTE incidence among these formulas. However, when dose reduction or contraindication threshold was determined by eGFR vs. CCr, the bleeding incidence was significantly higher in the group that was overdosed by CCr (6.0% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.05). Similarly, using de-indexed eGFR vs. CCr, the bleeding incidence was significantly higher in the group that was overdosed by CCr (7.5% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In orthopedic surgery, anticoagulant dosages should be based on CCr for patients with a small BSA to avoid bleeding risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"405-413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02580-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anticoagulation is recommended for thromboprophylaxis after lower-limb orthopedic surgery. The suggested dosage is based on creatinine clearance (CCr) in the labels. However, most facilities only provide estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as laboratory data. Because the eGFR equation adjusts for a body surface area (BSA) of 1.73 m2, it may overestimate renal function in patients with a small BSA. This retrospective study aimed to determine whether different renal function estimation formulas affect the incidences of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding when determining anticoagulant dosages.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent lower-limb orthopedic surgery and received anticoagulants (edoxaban, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux) between 2017 and 2020 at Yaizu City Hospital. Anticoagulant dosing was evaluated using CCr, eGFR, and de-indexed eGFR (without correction for BSA), and the incidences of VTE and bleeding were compared among these formulas.

Results: The median values for BSA, CCr, eGFR, and de-indexed eGFR were 1.40 m2, 56.0 mL/min, 73.0 mL/min/1.73m2, and 60.9 mL/min, respectively. There was no significant difference in the VTE incidence among these formulas. However, when dose reduction or contraindication threshold was determined by eGFR vs. CCr, the bleeding incidence was significantly higher in the group that was overdosed by CCr (6.0% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.05). Similarly, using de-indexed eGFR vs. CCr, the bleeding incidence was significantly higher in the group that was overdosed by CCr (7.5% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: In orthopedic surgery, anticoagulant dosages should be based on CCr for patients with a small BSA to avoid bleeding risks.

估算肾小球滤过率与肌酐清除率对比,以确定下肢矫形手术后的抗凝剂用量。
背景:建议在下肢矫形手术后使用抗凝药进行血栓预防。建议剂量基于标签中的肌酐清除率(CCr)。然而,大多数医疗机构仅提供估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)作为实验室数据。由于 eGFR 方程是根据 1.73 平方米的体表面积(BSA)进行调整的,因此可能会高估体表面积较小患者的肾功能。这项回顾性研究旨在确定在确定抗凝剂剂量时,不同的肾功能估算公式是否会影响静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)和出血的发生率:本研究纳入了2017年至2020年期间在烧津市立医院接受下肢矫形手术并接受抗凝药物(依多沙班、依诺肝素和磺达肝酮)治疗的患者。使用CCr、eGFR和去指数化eGFR(未校正BSA)对抗凝剂剂量进行评估,并比较这些公式中VTE和出血的发生率:BSA、CCr、eGFR 和去指数化 eGFR 的中值分别为 1.40 m2、56.0 mL/min、73.0 mL/min/1.73m2 和 60.9 mL/min。这些配方的 VTE 发生率无明显差异。然而,当根据 eGFR 与 CCr 的比较来确定减量或禁忌阈值时,CCr 过量组的出血发生率明显更高(6.0% 对 25.7%,P 结论:EGFR 过量组的出血发生率明显高于 CCr 过量组(6.0% 对 25.7%,P 结论:EGFR 过量组的出血发生率明显高于 CCr 过量组):在骨科手术中,对于 BSA 较小的患者,抗凝剂剂量应以 CCr 为基础,以避免出血风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信