Revisits and frailty in older patients in the emergency department - a prospective observational multicenter study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Helena Johansson, Sara Fahlander, Erika Hörlin, Joakim Henricson, Samia Munir Ehrlington, Jens Wretborn, Daniel Wilhelms
{"title":"Revisits and frailty in older patients in the emergency department - a prospective observational multicenter study.","authors":"Helena Johansson, Sara Fahlander, Erika Hörlin, Joakim Henricson, Samia Munir Ehrlington, Jens Wretborn, Daniel Wilhelms","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01123-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increased number of revisits may signal that the immediate medical needs of patients seeking care at Emergency Departments (EDs) are not being met. The prevalence and characteristics of revisits to the EDs in Sweden among older patients, and its association to frailty, are unknown. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of ED revisits among patients over 65 years of age, living with or without frailty, and its association with rate of admission, and mortality; in the Swedish ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicentre study of patients over 65 years of age with an index visit to one of three Swedish EDs during May-Nov 2021. Frailty was assessed in conjunction with standard triage, using the 9-level Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) with a CFS score of 5 to 8 as cut-off for identifying frailty. For all patients who made a revisit within 90 days of their index visit, we collected information about the revisit, admission, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1835 patients made an index visit which were included, and out of those, 595 patients made a revisit within 90 days of the index visit. Patients living with frailty (CFS 5 to 8) were more likely to make a revisit to the ED at 8 to 30 days (17% vs. 11%, diff 6%, 95% CI 2-10%, p < 0.001) and at 31 to 90 days (19% vs. 12%, diff 7%, 95% CI 3-10%, p < 0.001) and be admitted to in-hospital care during their revisit (57% vs. 47%, diff 10%, 95% CI, 1-18%, p < 0.05), compared to patients living without frailty. Results also show that patients living with frailty had a higher overall mortality rate (17% vs. 5%, diff 12%, 95% CI 7-18%, p < 0.001). However, among patients living without frailty, making a revisit slightly increased the mortality rate compared to those who did not (5% vs. 2%, diff 3%, 95% CI 1-10%, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients living with frailty make more revisits, are more often admitted to in-hospital care, and have a higher overall mortality rate than patients not living with frailty. Frailty, assessed with the CFS may be a simple and useful indicator of increased risk of adverse events, including revisits, in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01123-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An increased number of revisits may signal that the immediate medical needs of patients seeking care at Emergency Departments (EDs) are not being met. The prevalence and characteristics of revisits to the EDs in Sweden among older patients, and its association to frailty, are unknown. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of ED revisits among patients over 65 years of age, living with or without frailty, and its association with rate of admission, and mortality; in the Swedish ED setting.

Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre study of patients over 65 years of age with an index visit to one of three Swedish EDs during May-Nov 2021. Frailty was assessed in conjunction with standard triage, using the 9-level Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) with a CFS score of 5 to 8 as cut-off for identifying frailty. For all patients who made a revisit within 90 days of their index visit, we collected information about the revisit, admission, and mortality.

Results: A total of 1835 patients made an index visit which were included, and out of those, 595 patients made a revisit within 90 days of the index visit. Patients living with frailty (CFS 5 to 8) were more likely to make a revisit to the ED at 8 to 30 days (17% vs. 11%, diff 6%, 95% CI 2-10%, p < 0.001) and at 31 to 90 days (19% vs. 12%, diff 7%, 95% CI 3-10%, p < 0.001) and be admitted to in-hospital care during their revisit (57% vs. 47%, diff 10%, 95% CI, 1-18%, p < 0.05), compared to patients living without frailty. Results also show that patients living with frailty had a higher overall mortality rate (17% vs. 5%, diff 12%, 95% CI 7-18%, p < 0.001). However, among patients living without frailty, making a revisit slightly increased the mortality rate compared to those who did not (5% vs. 2%, diff 3%, 95% CI 1-10%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Patients living with frailty make more revisits, are more often admitted to in-hospital care, and have a higher overall mortality rate than patients not living with frailty. Frailty, assessed with the CFS may be a simple and useful indicator of increased risk of adverse events, including revisits, in the ED.

急诊科老年患者的复诊与虚弱--一项前瞻性多中心观察研究。
背景:再次就诊人数的增加可能预示着急诊科(ED)患者的即时医疗需求没有得到满足。瑞典老年患者重访急诊科的发生率和特点及其与虚弱的关系尚不清楚。我们的目的是调查瑞典急诊室环境中 65 岁以上、患有或不患有虚弱症的患者的急诊室复诊率及其与入院率和死亡率的关系:这是一项前瞻性多中心研究,研究对象是2021年5月至11月期间在瑞典三家急诊室之一就诊的65岁以上患者。在进行标准分诊的同时,采用9级临床虚弱量表(CFS)对患者的虚弱程度进行评估,CFS评分为5至8分时为确定虚弱程度的临界值。对于所有在就诊后 90 天内再次就诊的患者,我们收集了有关再次就诊、入院和死亡率的信息:结果:共有 1835 名患者进行了指数就诊,其中有 595 名患者在指数就诊后 90 天内进行了复诊。体弱患者(CFS 5 至 8)更有可能在 8 至 30 天内再次到急诊室就诊(17% 对 11%,差值为 6%,95% CI 为 2-10%,P与非体弱患者相比,体弱患者再次就诊的次数更多,住院治疗的频率更高,总死亡率也更高。用 CFS 评估虚弱程度可能是一个简单而有用的指标,可用于评估急诊室不良事件(包括再次就诊)风险的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信