Comparison of Two Methods of Antepartum Anticoagulation: Continuation of Enoxaparin until Scheduled Induction of Labor Versus Transitioning to Heparin with Spontaneous Labor.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-09-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0039
Marcia DesJardin, Edward Raff, Brian James, Angelina Mozier, Nicholas Baranco, Dimitrios Mastrogiannis
{"title":"Comparison of Two Methods of Antepartum Anticoagulation: Continuation of Enoxaparin until Scheduled Induction of Labor Versus Transitioning to Heparin with Spontaneous Labor.","authors":"Marcia DesJardin, Edward Raff, Brian James, Angelina Mozier, Nicholas Baranco, Dimitrios Mastrogiannis","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state. There is a lack of strong evidence-based guidance regarding management when anticoagulation is required to prevent or treat venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. In practice, some patients are prescribed enoxaparin and transitioned to heparin due to the shorter half-life in the setting of an unpredictable delivery despite less predictable pharmacokinetics of heparin compared with enoxaparin, while others are continued on enoxaparin with a scheduled delivery. This work retrospectively evaluates obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between these two practices for 194 live singleton deliveries from 179 patients in a single institution January 2017 through May 2022. A Bayesian regression was used to control for confounders including dosing regimens. This work found no statistically significant differences in blood loss at time of delivery or availability of neuraxial anesthesia. This suggests continuing enoxaparin is noninferior to transitioning to heparin when anticoagulation is indicated in pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"720-726"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state. There is a lack of strong evidence-based guidance regarding management when anticoagulation is required to prevent or treat venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. In practice, some patients are prescribed enoxaparin and transitioned to heparin due to the shorter half-life in the setting of an unpredictable delivery despite less predictable pharmacokinetics of heparin compared with enoxaparin, while others are continued on enoxaparin with a scheduled delivery. This work retrospectively evaluates obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between these two practices for 194 live singleton deliveries from 179 patients in a single institution January 2017 through May 2022. A Bayesian regression was used to control for confounders including dosing regimens. This work found no statistically significant differences in blood loss at time of delivery or availability of neuraxial anesthesia. This suggests continuing enoxaparin is noninferior to transitioning to heparin when anticoagulation is indicated in pregnancy.

两种产前抗凝方法的比较:在预定引产前继续使用依诺肝素与在自然分娩时过渡使用肝素两种产前凝血方法的比较。
妊娠是一种高凝状态。在妊娠期需要抗凝以预防或治疗静脉血栓栓塞时,缺乏强有力的循证指导。在实践中,尽管肝素的药代动力学与依诺肝素相比更难预测,但在无法预测分娩的情况下,一些患者会被处方依诺肝素,并因其半衰期较短而过渡到肝素;而另一些患者则会在预产期前继续使用依诺肝素。本研究回顾性评估了2017年1月至2022年5月期间一家医疗机构179名患者194例单胎活产的产科和新生儿结局。采用贝叶斯回归法控制包括给药方案在内的混杂因素。这项研究发现,分娩时失血量或神经麻醉的可用性在统计学上没有显著差异。这表明,在妊娠期需要进行抗凝治疗时,继续使用依诺肝素并不优于过渡使用肝素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信