Older adults' views on training tools to prevent cognitive decline.

Informatics for health & social care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1080/17538157.2024.2417659
Celine Cammarata, Elaine Wethington, Adam K Anderson, Eve De Rosa
{"title":"Older adults' views on training tools to prevent cognitive decline.","authors":"Celine Cammarata, Elaine Wethington, Adam K Anderson, Eve De Rosa","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2024.2417659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computerized training platforms could be an accessible means for older adults to maintain cognitive health, and several such tools are already commercially available. However, it remains unclear whether older adults use these tools if training is not externally prescribed. We explored older adults' self-initiated experiences with cognitive training. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 community-dwelling adults aged 58-85 years, comprising university retirees (<i>N</i> = 8) and public housing residents (<i>N</i> = 5). Interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis. No participants voluntarily used cognitive training, and those who had done so previously reported negative experiences. Several factors shaped older adults' engagement with cognitive training, especially a preference for stimulating activities that are organic and inherently enjoyable. We reveal a mismatch between older adults' priorities and the interventions currently available and uncover issues of access and interest among low-income and minority individuals. We suggest ways to better align future interventions with older adults' priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":101409,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for health & social care","volume":" ","pages":"246-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for health & social care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2024.2417659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computerized training platforms could be an accessible means for older adults to maintain cognitive health, and several such tools are already commercially available. However, it remains unclear whether older adults use these tools if training is not externally prescribed. We explored older adults' self-initiated experiences with cognitive training. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 community-dwelling adults aged 58-85 years, comprising university retirees (N = 8) and public housing residents (N = 5). Interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis. No participants voluntarily used cognitive training, and those who had done so previously reported negative experiences. Several factors shaped older adults' engagement with cognitive training, especially a preference for stimulating activities that are organic and inherently enjoyable. We reveal a mismatch between older adults' priorities and the interventions currently available and uncover issues of access and interest among low-income and minority individuals. We suggest ways to better align future interventions with older adults' priorities.

老年人对预防认知能力下降的培训工具的看法。
计算机化的训练平台可以成为老年人保持认知健康的一种便捷手段,目前市场上已经有几种这样的工具。然而,如果没有外部规定的训练,老年人是否会使用这些工具仍不清楚。我们探讨了老年人自发进行认知训练的经历。我们对 13 名居住在社区的 58-85 岁成年人进行了半结构化访谈,其中包括大学退休人员(8 人)和公共住房居民(5 人)。我们对访谈内容进行了主题分析。没有参与者自愿使用认知训练,以前使用过认知训练的人则报告了负面的经历。有几个因素影响了老年人对认知训练的参与,尤其是他们更喜欢有机的、本质上令人愉快的刺激性活动。我们揭示了老年人的优先事项与现有干预措施之间的不匹配,并揭示了低收入和少数群体中的获取和兴趣问题。我们提出了一些方法,使未来的干预措施更好地与老年人的优先事项保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信