Biologics and oral systemic treatment preferences in patients and physicians for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment in the United Kingdom and Germany.

Nicholas Durno, Pablo Arija, Krystallia Pantiri, Marieke Heisen, Marco Boeri, Josef Paris, Katrin Jack, Olivier Chambenoit, Ramkumar Subramanian, Jorge Puelles, Elly Stolk, Ben van Hout, Jonathan I Silverberg
{"title":"Biologics and oral systemic treatment preferences in patients and physicians for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment in the United Kingdom and Germany.","authors":"Nicholas Durno, Pablo Arija, Krystallia Pantiri, Marieke Heisen, Marco Boeri, Josef Paris, Katrin Jack, Olivier Chambenoit, Ramkumar Subramanian, Jorge Puelles, Elly Stolk, Ben van Hout, Jonathan I Silverberg","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2417966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> As the available treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) expand, understanding patient and physician preferences becomes crucial for informed decision-making.</p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> To quantify patient and physician preferences for biologics and oral systemic AD treatment attributes.</p><p><p><b>Materials and methods:</b> We conducted a cross-sectional, online discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 306 AD patients and 206 physicians throughout the United Kingdom and Germany. Qualitative interviews identified the key attributes for inclusion in the DCE. Each choice task comprised two hypothetical patient profiles. Data were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Results indicated a significant emphasis on efficacy, with reducing sleep disturbance and itch ranking first and second among patients, and the reverse for physicians. Time to itch relief was the third most important efficacy attribute for both groups, but relatively more important for patients than for physicians. For both groups, the risk of eye problems was the most important safety concern of those included. Mode of administration was not of great importance compared to efficacy and safety attributes.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest patients prioritize sleep disturbance, an attribute not captured in prior preference studies in AD, time to itch relief and itch. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing sleep-related issues, whilst also targeting fast itch control, to enhance patients' well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2417966"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2417966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the available treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) expand, understanding patient and physician preferences becomes crucial for informed decision-making.

Objective: To quantify patient and physician preferences for biologics and oral systemic AD treatment attributes.

Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, online discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 306 AD patients and 206 physicians throughout the United Kingdom and Germany. Qualitative interviews identified the key attributes for inclusion in the DCE. Each choice task comprised two hypothetical patient profiles. Data were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model.

Results: Results indicated a significant emphasis on efficacy, with reducing sleep disturbance and itch ranking first and second among patients, and the reverse for physicians. Time to itch relief was the third most important efficacy attribute for both groups, but relatively more important for patients than for physicians. For both groups, the risk of eye problems was the most important safety concern of those included. Mode of administration was not of great importance compared to efficacy and safety attributes.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest patients prioritize sleep disturbance, an attribute not captured in prior preference studies in AD, time to itch relief and itch. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing sleep-related issues, whilst also targeting fast itch control, to enhance patients' well-being.

中重度特应性皮炎患者和医生对生物制剂和口服系统治疗的偏好:英国和德国的离散选择实验。
背景:随着中重度特应性皮炎(AD)可用治疗方法的增多,了解患者和医生的偏好对于做出知情决策至关重要:量化患者和医生对生物制剂和口服系统性特应性皮炎治疗属性的偏好:我们进行了一项横断面在线离散选择实验(DCE),涉及英国和德国的 306 名 AD 患者和 206 名医生。定性访谈确定了纳入 DCE 的关键属性。每个选择任务包括两个假设的患者资料。数据采用随机参数 logit 模型进行分析:结果:结果表明,患者非常重视疗效,减少睡眠障碍和瘙痒在患者中排名第一和第二,而在医生中则相反。对两组患者而言,止痒时间是第三重要的疗效属性,但患者的重要性相对高于医生。对两组患者而言,眼部问题的风险是最重要的安全问题。与疗效和安全性相比,给药方式并不重要:我们的研究结果表明,患者会优先考虑睡眠障碍(这是之前的注意力缺失症偏好研究中未涉及的一个属性)、止痒时间和瘙痒。这些发现强调了解决睡眠相关问题的重要性,同时也以快速止痒为目标,以提高患者的幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信