Machine Learning For Risk Prediction After Heart Failure Emergency Department Visit or Hospital Admission Using Administrative Health Data.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000636
Nowell M Fine, Sunil V Kalmady, Weijie Sun, Russ Greiner, Jonathan G Howlett, James A White, Finlay A McAlister, Justin A Ezekowitz, Padma Kaul
{"title":"Machine Learning For Risk Prediction After Heart Failure Emergency Department Visit or Hospital Admission Using Administrative Health Data.","authors":"Nowell M Fine, Sunil V Kalmady, Weijie Sun, Russ Greiner, Jonathan G Howlett, James A White, Finlay A McAlister, Justin A Ezekowitz, Padma Kaul","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients visiting the emergency department (ED) or hospitalized for heart failure (HF) are at increased risk for subsequent adverse outcomes, however effective risk stratification remains challenging. We utilized a machine-learning (ML)-based approach to identify HF patients at risk of adverse outcomes after an ED visit or hospitalization using a large regional administrative healthcare data system.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients visiting the ED or hospitalized with HF between 2002-2016 in Alberta, Canada were included. Outcomes of interest were 30-day and 1-year HF-related ED visits, HF hospital readmission or all-cause mortality. We applied a feature extraction method using deep feature synthesis from multiple sources of health data and compared performance of a gradient boosting algorithm (CatBoost) with logistic regression modelling. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was used to assess model performance. We included 50,630 patients with 93,552 HF ED visits/hospitalizations. At 30-day follow-up in the holdout validation cohort, the AUC-ROC for the combined endpoint of HF ED visit, HF hospital readmission or death for the Catboost and logistic regression models was 74.16 (73.18-75.11) versus 62.25 (61.25-63.18), respectively. At 1-year follow-up corresponding values were 76.80 (76.1-77.47) versus 69.52 (68.77-70.26), respectively. AUC-ROC values for the endpoint of all-cause death alone at 30-days and 1-year follow-up were 83.21 (81.83-84.41) versus 69.53 (67.98-71.18), and 85.73 (85.14-86.29) versus 69.40 (68.57-70.26), for the CatBoost and logistic regression models, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML-based modelling with deep feature synthesis provided superior risk stratification for HF patients at 30-days and 1-year follow-up after an ED visit or hospitalization using data from a large administrative regional healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 10","pages":"e0000636"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Patients visiting the emergency department (ED) or hospitalized for heart failure (HF) are at increased risk for subsequent adverse outcomes, however effective risk stratification remains challenging. We utilized a machine-learning (ML)-based approach to identify HF patients at risk of adverse outcomes after an ED visit or hospitalization using a large regional administrative healthcare data system.

Methods and results: Patients visiting the ED or hospitalized with HF between 2002-2016 in Alberta, Canada were included. Outcomes of interest were 30-day and 1-year HF-related ED visits, HF hospital readmission or all-cause mortality. We applied a feature extraction method using deep feature synthesis from multiple sources of health data and compared performance of a gradient boosting algorithm (CatBoost) with logistic regression modelling. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was used to assess model performance. We included 50,630 patients with 93,552 HF ED visits/hospitalizations. At 30-day follow-up in the holdout validation cohort, the AUC-ROC for the combined endpoint of HF ED visit, HF hospital readmission or death for the Catboost and logistic regression models was 74.16 (73.18-75.11) versus 62.25 (61.25-63.18), respectively. At 1-year follow-up corresponding values were 76.80 (76.1-77.47) versus 69.52 (68.77-70.26), respectively. AUC-ROC values for the endpoint of all-cause death alone at 30-days and 1-year follow-up were 83.21 (81.83-84.41) versus 69.53 (67.98-71.18), and 85.73 (85.14-86.29) versus 69.40 (68.57-70.26), for the CatBoost and logistic regression models, respectively.

Conclusions: ML-based modelling with deep feature synthesis provided superior risk stratification for HF patients at 30-days and 1-year follow-up after an ED visit or hospitalization using data from a large administrative regional healthcare system.

利用健康管理数据进行心力衰竭急诊就诊或入院后风险预测的机器学习。
目的:因心力衰竭(HF)到急诊科(ED)就诊或住院的患者随后出现不良后果的风险会增加,但有效的风险分层仍具有挑战性。我们采用了一种基于机器学习(ML)的方法,利用一个大型地区行政医疗数据系统来识别急诊科就诊或住院后有不良后果风险的心衰患者:纳入了 2002-2016 年间加拿大艾伯塔省的急诊室就诊或住院的高血压患者。我们关注的结果是 30 天和 1 年的心房颤动相关急诊就诊、心房颤动再入院或全因死亡率。我们从多个健康数据源中采用深度特征综合提取方法,并比较了梯度提升算法(CatBoost)和逻辑回归模型的性能。接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)用于评估模型性能。我们纳入了 50,630 名患者,其中 93,552 人次接受了高频急诊就诊/住院治疗。在保留验证队列的 30 天随访中,Catboost 模型和逻辑回归模型对合并终点(HF ED 就诊、HF 再入院或死亡)的 AUC-ROC 分别为 74.16(73.18-75.11)和 62.25(61.25-63.18)。随访 1 年的相应值分别为 76.80(76.1-77.47)对 69.52(68.77-70.26)。CatBoost模型和逻辑回归模型在30天和随访1年时的全因死亡终点AUC-ROC值分别为83.21(81.83-84.41)对69.53(67.98-71.18),85.73(85.14-86.29)对69.40(68.57-70.26):基于 ML 的建模与深度特征合成可在急诊室就诊或住院后 30 天和 1 年随访期间,利用大型行政区域医疗保健系统的数据为心房颤动患者提供更优越的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信