Diagnostic Safety: Needs Assessment and Informed Curriculum at an Academic Children's Hospital.

IF 1.1 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000773
Morgan Congdon, Irit R Rasooly, Regina L Toto, Danielle Capriola, Anna Costello, Richard J Scarfone, Anna K Weiss
{"title":"Diagnostic Safety: Needs Assessment and Informed Curriculum at an Academic Children's Hospital.","authors":"Morgan Congdon, Irit R Rasooly, Regina L Toto, Danielle Capriola, Anna Costello, Richard J Scarfone, Anna K Weiss","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic excellence is central to healthcare quality and safety. Prior literature identified a lack of psychological safety and time as barriers to diagnostic reasoning education. We performed a needs assessment to inform the development of diagnostic safety education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate existing educational programming and identify opportunities for content delivery, surveys were emailed to 155 interprofessional educational leaders and 627 clinicians at our hospital. Educational leaders and learners were invited to participate in focus groups to further explore beliefs, perceptions, and recommendations about diagnostic reasoning. The study team analyzed data using directed content analysis to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 57 education leaders who responded to our survey, only 2 (5%) reported having formal training on diagnostic reasoning in their respective departments. The learner survey had a response rate of 47% (293/627). Learners expressed discomfort discussing diagnostic uncertainty and preferred case-based discussions and bedside learning as avenues for learning about the topic. Focus groups, including 7 educators and 16 learners, identified the following as necessary precursors to effective teaching about diagnostic safety: (1) faculty development, (2) institutional culture change, and (3) improved reporting of missed diagnoses. Participants preferred mandatory sessions integrated into existing educational programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our needs assessment identified a broad interest in education regarding medical diagnosis and potential barriers to implementation. Respondents highlighted the need to develop communication skills regarding diagnostic errors and uncertainty across professions and care areas. Study findings informed a pilot diagnostic reasoning curriculum for faculty and trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"9 6","pages":"e773"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic excellence is central to healthcare quality and safety. Prior literature identified a lack of psychological safety and time as barriers to diagnostic reasoning education. We performed a needs assessment to inform the development of diagnostic safety education.

Methods: To evaluate existing educational programming and identify opportunities for content delivery, surveys were emailed to 155 interprofessional educational leaders and 627 clinicians at our hospital. Educational leaders and learners were invited to participate in focus groups to further explore beliefs, perceptions, and recommendations about diagnostic reasoning. The study team analyzed data using directed content analysis to identify themes.

Results: Of the 57 education leaders who responded to our survey, only 2 (5%) reported having formal training on diagnostic reasoning in their respective departments. The learner survey had a response rate of 47% (293/627). Learners expressed discomfort discussing diagnostic uncertainty and preferred case-based discussions and bedside learning as avenues for learning about the topic. Focus groups, including 7 educators and 16 learners, identified the following as necessary precursors to effective teaching about diagnostic safety: (1) faculty development, (2) institutional culture change, and (3) improved reporting of missed diagnoses. Participants preferred mandatory sessions integrated into existing educational programs.

Conclusions: Our needs assessment identified a broad interest in education regarding medical diagnosis and potential barriers to implementation. Respondents highlighted the need to develop communication skills regarding diagnostic errors and uncertainty across professions and care areas. Study findings informed a pilot diagnostic reasoning curriculum for faculty and trainees.

Abstract Image

诊断安全:一家学术儿童医院的需求评估和知情课程。
背景:卓越的诊断对医疗质量和安全至关重要。先前的文献指出,缺乏心理安全和时间是诊断推理教育的障碍。我们进行了一项需求评估,以便为诊断安全教育的发展提供信息:为了评估现有的教育计划并确定内容提供的机会,我们通过电子邮件向本院的 155 名跨专业教育领导者和 627 名临床医生发送了调查问卷。我们还邀请教育领导者和学员参加焦点小组,进一步探讨有关诊断推理的信念、看法和建议。研究小组采用定向内容分析法对数据进行了分析,以确定主题:在对我们的调查做出回复的 57 位教育领导者中,只有 2 位(5%)表示在各自的部门接受过正规的诊断推理培训。学员调查的回复率为 47%(293/627)。学员们表示不习惯讨论诊断的不确定性,而更倾向于以病例为基础的讨论和床边学习作为学习该主题的途径。包括 7 名教育工作者和 16 名学员在内的焦点小组认为,有效开展诊断安全教学的必要先决条件如下:(1)师资队伍建设;(2)机构文化变革;(3)改进漏诊报告。参与者倾向于将强制性课程纳入现有的教育计划:我们的需求评估确定了人们对医疗诊断教育的广泛兴趣以及实施的潜在障碍。受访者强调,需要培养跨专业和医疗领域的诊断错误和不确定性方面的沟通技巧。研究结果为针对教师和学员的试点诊断推理课程提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信