Pyrocarbon Hemi-Shoulder Arthroplasty Provides Satisfactory Outcomes Following Prior Open Latarjet.

Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-10-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24715492241292857
Louis Lajoinie, Jérôme Garret, Floris van Rooij, Mo Saffarini, Arnaud Godenèche
{"title":"Pyrocarbon Hemi-Shoulder Arthroplasty Provides Satisfactory Outcomes Following Prior Open Latarjet.","authors":"Louis Lajoinie, Jérôme Garret, Floris van Rooij, Mo Saffarini, Arnaud Godenèche","doi":"10.1177/24715492241292857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes, at a minimum follow-up of 4 years, following HSA using pyrocarbon in patients that had prior open Latarjet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors retrieved the records of 61 consecutive patients that underwent HSA with a pyrocarbon humeral head at 2 centers between December 2013 and October 2019. Eight patients (9 shoulders) had undergone previous Latarjet procedures without other surgical antecedents. Patients underwent radiological assessment, and clinical assessment including Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and pain on VAS. Finally, range of motion was assessed, including active forward elevation and external rotation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial cohort of 9 shoulders, comprised 1 woman and 7 men (1 bilateral), aged 52.5 ± 5.2 at their index HSA, which was performed 27.7 ± 9.3 years following their prior Latarjet procedure. One shoulder required conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 3 years after HSA. The remaining 8 shoulders were assessed at 6.1 ± 1.6 years (range, 4-8) after the index HSA. Glenoid erosion only progressed in 1 shoulder from mild to moderate. The Constant score was 79.6 ± 12.7, pain on VAS was 1.0 ± 2.1, and SSV was 80.0 ± 25.6. The active forward elevation improved from 96°±41° to 151°±29°, and external rotation from 11°±17° to 32°±8°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients that underwent HSA using pyrocarbon heads following prior Latarjet had satisfactory clinical scores, and glenoid erosion only progressed in 1 patient. Furthermore, only 1 patient required conversion to RSA. The clinical relevance is that HSA using pyrocarbon heads is a safe treatment and grants satisfactory clinical outcomes in patients with prior Latarjet.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":"8 ","pages":"24715492241292857"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492241292857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes, at a minimum follow-up of 4 years, following HSA using pyrocarbon in patients that had prior open Latarjet.

Methods: The authors retrieved the records of 61 consecutive patients that underwent HSA with a pyrocarbon humeral head at 2 centers between December 2013 and October 2019. Eight patients (9 shoulders) had undergone previous Latarjet procedures without other surgical antecedents. Patients underwent radiological assessment, and clinical assessment including Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and pain on VAS. Finally, range of motion was assessed, including active forward elevation and external rotation.

Results: The initial cohort of 9 shoulders, comprised 1 woman and 7 men (1 bilateral), aged 52.5 ± 5.2 at their index HSA, which was performed 27.7 ± 9.3 years following their prior Latarjet procedure. One shoulder required conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 3 years after HSA. The remaining 8 shoulders were assessed at 6.1 ± 1.6 years (range, 4-8) after the index HSA. Glenoid erosion only progressed in 1 shoulder from mild to moderate. The Constant score was 79.6 ± 12.7, pain on VAS was 1.0 ± 2.1, and SSV was 80.0 ± 25.6. The active forward elevation improved from 96°±41° to 151°±29°, and external rotation from 11°±17° to 32°±8°.

Conclusion: Patients that underwent HSA using pyrocarbon heads following prior Latarjet had satisfactory clinical scores, and glenoid erosion only progressed in 1 patient. Furthermore, only 1 patient required conversion to RSA. The clinical relevance is that HSA using pyrocarbon heads is a safe treatment and grants satisfactory clinical outcomes in patients with prior Latarjet.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

热碳半肩人工关节置换术为曾接受过开放式 Latarjet 的患者提供了令人满意的疗效。
目的:评估曾接受过开放式Latarjet手术的患者在使用热碳肱骨头HSA后至少随访4年的临床和影像学结果:作者检索了 2013 年 12 月至 2019 年 10 月期间在 2 个中心使用热碳肱骨头进行 HSA 的 61 名连续患者的记录。8名患者(9个肩膀)之前接受过Latarjet手术,没有其他手术前兆。患者接受了放射学评估和临床评估,包括 Constant 评分、肩部主观值(SSV)和 VAS 疼痛。最后,还对患者的活动范围进行了评估,包括主动前抬和外旋:最初的 9 例肩关节病例中,1 例为女性,7 例为男性(1 例为双侧),年龄为(52.5±5.2)岁,HSA 指数为(27.7±9.3)年。其中一个肩部需要在 HSA 术后 3 年转为反向肩关节置换术。其余 8 个肩部在指数 HSA 术后 6.1 ± 1.6 年(4-8 年)进行了评估。只有一个肩关节的盂面侵蚀从轻度发展到中度。Constant 评分为 79.6 ± 12.7,VAS 疼痛评分为 1.0 ± 2.1,SSV 评分为 80.0 ± 25.6。主动前抬从 96°±41°提高到 151°±29°,外旋从 11°±17°提高到 32°±8°:结论:在接受过Latarjet手术后,使用热碳头进行HSA手术的患者临床评分令人满意,仅有1名患者的盂侵蚀有所进展。此外,只有一名患者需要转为 RSA。其临床意义在于,使用热碳头进行HSA是一种安全的治疗方法,可为既往接受过Latarjet治疗的患者带来满意的临床结果:证据等级:三级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信