Thyroid function status in patients with hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement and associated factors: a retrospective cohort study in primary care.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kalaipriya Gunasekaran, Ding Xuan Ng, Ngiap Chuan Tan
{"title":"Thyroid function status in patients with hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement and associated factors: a retrospective cohort study in primary care.","authors":"Kalaipriya Gunasekaran, Ding Xuan Ng, Ngiap Chuan Tan","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02613-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term management of patients with hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement requires thyroid function test (TFT) monitoring once every six-12 months as recommended by clinical practice guidelines. This study determined their thyroid function status during two-year follow-up visits in primary care, and the factors influencing their thyroid status, and assessed the optimal interval for TFTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults with a clinical diagnosis code for hypothyroidism in their electronic health records taken from a group of polyclinics in Singapore between July 2017 and June 2020. The follow-up thyroid status was categorized as under-replacement (TSH ≥ 3.70mIU/L), over-replacement (TSH ≤ 0.65mIU/L) or euthyroid (TSH 0.65-3.70mIU/L). The patients' demographic, clinical and TFT data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests during the two-year follow-up. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the factors associated with suboptimal thyroid control. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare their thyroid function status in association with the interval between TFT monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 5,749 eligible subjects (mean age 62.1 ± 13.29 years; 79% female; 79.7% Chinese) were analyzed. After a two-year follow-up, 61.9% (n = 3558) of all subjects were euthyroid, with 29.5% (n = 1694) being under-replaced and 8.6% (n = 497) over-replaced. However, thyroid status did not differ significantly with the various dose regimen (daily, segmented, or alternate days) (p = 0.193). Stepwise logistic regression showed that thyroxine under-replacement was significantly associated with the male gender (AOR = 1.25,95%CI = 1.03-1.51,p = 0.02) and obesity (AOR = 1.34,95%CI = 1.08-1.66,p = 0.008). Every unit (μg/kg body weight) increase in the mean daily thyroxine dose was associated with 2.72 times greater odds of over-replacement. When comparing thyroid function monitoring at intervals of 13-24 months, monitoring at shorter intervals (≤ 12 months) was less likely to detect thyroxine under-replacement (AOR = 0.57,95%CI = 0.44-0.74,p < 0.001) and over-replacement (AOR = 0.62,95%CI = 0.41-0.97,p = 0.033). Among the 3,312 adults who were euthyroid at baseline, 22.2%, 41.7% and 59.6% had suboptimal thyroid control at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively (Kaplan-Meier analysis).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Around six in ten patients were euthyroid with thyroxine replacement for hypothyroidism in primary care over two years. Thyroxine under-replacement was associated with male gender and obesity. The proportion of euthyroid patients developing abnormal thyroid function doubled with TFTs at six, 12 and 24-month intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02613-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term management of patients with hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement requires thyroid function test (TFT) monitoring once every six-12 months as recommended by clinical practice guidelines. This study determined their thyroid function status during two-year follow-up visits in primary care, and the factors influencing their thyroid status, and assessed the optimal interval for TFTs.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults with a clinical diagnosis code for hypothyroidism in their electronic health records taken from a group of polyclinics in Singapore between July 2017 and June 2020. The follow-up thyroid status was categorized as under-replacement (TSH ≥ 3.70mIU/L), over-replacement (TSH ≤ 0.65mIU/L) or euthyroid (TSH 0.65-3.70mIU/L). The patients' demographic, clinical and TFT data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests during the two-year follow-up. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the factors associated with suboptimal thyroid control. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare their thyroid function status in association with the interval between TFT monitoring.

Results: Data from 5,749 eligible subjects (mean age 62.1 ± 13.29 years; 79% female; 79.7% Chinese) were analyzed. After a two-year follow-up, 61.9% (n = 3558) of all subjects were euthyroid, with 29.5% (n = 1694) being under-replaced and 8.6% (n = 497) over-replaced. However, thyroid status did not differ significantly with the various dose regimen (daily, segmented, or alternate days) (p = 0.193). Stepwise logistic regression showed that thyroxine under-replacement was significantly associated with the male gender (AOR = 1.25,95%CI = 1.03-1.51,p = 0.02) and obesity (AOR = 1.34,95%CI = 1.08-1.66,p = 0.008). Every unit (μg/kg body weight) increase in the mean daily thyroxine dose was associated with 2.72 times greater odds of over-replacement. When comparing thyroid function monitoring at intervals of 13-24 months, monitoring at shorter intervals (≤ 12 months) was less likely to detect thyroxine under-replacement (AOR = 0.57,95%CI = 0.44-0.74,p < 0.001) and over-replacement (AOR = 0.62,95%CI = 0.41-0.97,p = 0.033). Among the 3,312 adults who were euthyroid at baseline, 22.2%, 41.7% and 59.6% had suboptimal thyroid control at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively (Kaplan-Meier analysis).

Conclusion: Around six in ten patients were euthyroid with thyroxine replacement for hypothyroidism in primary care over two years. Thyroxine under-replacement was associated with male gender and obesity. The proportion of euthyroid patients developing abnormal thyroid function doubled with TFTs at six, 12 and 24-month intervals.

接受甲状腺素替代治疗的甲状腺功能减退症患者的甲状腺功能状况及相关因素:一项基层医疗机构的回顾性队列研究。
背景:根据临床实践指南的建议,甲状腺功能减退症患者在接受甲状腺素替代治疗后,需要每6-12个月接受一次甲状腺功能检测(TFT)。本研究确定了基层医疗机构两年随访期间患者的甲状腺功能状态、影响甲状腺状态的因素,并评估了甲状腺功能检测的最佳间隔时间:这项回顾性队列研究的对象是2017年7月至2020年6月期间在新加坡一组综合医院的电子健康记录中带有甲状腺功能减退症临床诊断代码的成年人。随访甲状腺状态分为替代不足(TSH ≥ 3.70mIU/L)、替代过度(TSH ≤ 0.65mIU/L)或甲状腺功能亢进(TSH 0.65-3.70mIU/L)。在为期两年的随访期间,采用适当的统计检验对患者的人口统计学、临床和 TFT 数据进行了分析。逐步逻辑回归分析确定了与甲状腺控制欠佳相关的因素。Kaplan-Meier分析用于比较甲状腺功能状态与TFT监测间隔的关系:分析了 5749 名符合条件的受试者(平均年龄 62.1 ± 13.29 岁;79% 为女性;79.7% 为中国人)的数据。经过两年的随访,61.9%(n = 3558)的受试者甲状腺功能正常,29.5%(n = 1694)的受试者甲状腺功能替代不足,8.6%(n = 497)的受试者甲状腺功能替代过度。然而,甲状腺状态与不同的剂量方案(每日、分段或隔日)并无显著差异(p = 0.193)。逐步逻辑回归显示,甲状腺素补充不足与男性(AOR = 1.25,95%CI = 1.03-1.51,p = 0.02)和肥胖(AOR = 1.34,95%CI = 1.08-1.66,p = 0.008)显著相关。甲状腺素日平均剂量每增加一个单位(微克/千克体重),过度补充的几率就会增加2.72倍。如果比较每隔13-24个月进行一次的甲状腺功能监测,那么每隔较短时间(≤ 12个月)进行的监测更不容易发现甲状腺素补充不足(AOR = 0.57,95%CI = 0.44-0.74,p 结论):约十分之六的甲状腺功能减退症患者在两年内接受了甲状腺素替代治疗。甲状腺素替代不足与男性和肥胖有关。每隔 6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月进行一次 TFT 检查,甲状腺功能异常的甲状腺功能正常患者的比例会增加一倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信