Evaluation of the Australian Triage Scale in patients who present to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kimberley Ryan, Lee Jones, Sherry Cass, Jacob Christensen, Mark Appleyard, Anthony Ft Brown, Florian Grimpen
{"title":"Evaluation of the Australian Triage Scale in patients who present to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.","authors":"Kimberley Ryan, Lee Jones, Sherry Cass, Jacob Christensen, Mark Appleyard, Anthony Ft Brown, Florian Grimpen","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluation of the Australian Triage Scale in patients who present to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). Study aims were to evaluate the utility of the Australasian Triage Score (ATS) in patients presenting to the ED with UGIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 356 patients over a 2-year period who presented to a metropolitan hospital ED. The ATS was categorised into three groups, ATS 1/2, ATS 3 and ATS 4/5. Primary outcomes explored the relationship between ATS and haemodynamic parameters. Secondary outcomes evaluated the proportion of patients with suspected variceal bleeding and allocated a non-life-threatening ATS category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population were distributed by ATS 1/2 (28.7 %), ATS 3 (46.6 %) and ATS 4/5 (24.7 %). Over half of patients with some haemodynamic compromise were allocated an ATS 3 or 4/5. Additionally, 56 % with suspected variceal bleeding and 51 % with syncope were also allocated an ATS category (3 or 4/5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The utility of the ATS recognises most patients presenting with UGIB at high-risk of adverse outcomes. Additional screening at triage maybe beneficial for those patients with a history of cirrhosis or varices, and UGIB-related syncope. Consideration of an ATS category of 2 for these patients may enable them to access earlier time-critical therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.10.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation of the Australian Triage Scale in patients who present to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). Study aims were to evaluate the utility of the Australasian Triage Score (ATS) in patients presenting to the ED with UGIB.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 356 patients over a 2-year period who presented to a metropolitan hospital ED. The ATS was categorised into three groups, ATS 1/2, ATS 3 and ATS 4/5. Primary outcomes explored the relationship between ATS and haemodynamic parameters. Secondary outcomes evaluated the proportion of patients with suspected variceal bleeding and allocated a non-life-threatening ATS category.

Results: The study population were distributed by ATS 1/2 (28.7 %), ATS 3 (46.6 %) and ATS 4/5 (24.7 %). Over half of patients with some haemodynamic compromise were allocated an ATS 3 or 4/5. Additionally, 56 % with suspected variceal bleeding and 51 % with syncope were also allocated an ATS category (3 or 4/5).

Conclusions: The utility of the ATS recognises most patients presenting with UGIB at high-risk of adverse outcomes. Additional screening at triage maybe beneficial for those patients with a history of cirrhosis or varices, and UGIB-related syncope. Consideration of an ATS category of 2 for these patients may enable them to access earlier time-critical therapies.

对急诊科上消化道出血患者的澳大利亚分诊量表进行评估。
评估澳大利亚分诊量表在急诊科上消化道出血患者中的应用 背景:上消化道出血(UGIB)是急诊科(ED)的常见病。研究目的是评估澳大拉西亚分诊评分表(ATS)在上消化道出血急诊患者中的实用性:这项回顾性观察研究纳入了 356 名在两年内到一家都市医院急诊科就诊的患者。ATS分为三组:ATS 1/2、ATS 3和ATS 4/5。主要研究结果探讨了 ATS 与血流动力学参数之间的关系。次要结果评估了疑似静脉曲张出血患者的比例,并分配了不危及生命的 ATS 类别:研究人群的 ATS 分布为 1/2(28.7%)、ATS 3(46.6%)和 ATS 4/5(24.7%)。半数以上血流动力学受到一定影响的患者被划分为 ATS 3 或 4/5。此外,56%的疑似静脉曲张出血患者和 51%的晕厥患者也被分到了 ATS 类别(3 或 4/5):结论:ATS 的实用性可识别出大多数 UGIB 患者的不良后果高风险。在分诊时对有肝硬化或静脉曲张病史以及 UGIB 相关晕厥的患者进行额外筛查可能会有所帮助。考虑将这些患者的 ATS 分为 2 类,可使他们更早地接受时间紧迫的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信