An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessment and treatment of acute shoulder dislocation

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Shiro Gonai MD, MPH , Takahiro Miyoshi MD, DrPH , Katharina da Silva Lopes PhD, MPH , Stuart Gilmour PhD
{"title":"An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessment and treatment of acute shoulder dislocation","authors":"Shiro Gonai MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Takahiro Miyoshi MD, DrPH ,&nbsp;Katharina da Silva Lopes PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Stuart Gilmour PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.09.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence on accurate and rapid diagnostic methods, effective and safe shoulder dislocation reduction techniques, pharmacological treatment, and post-reduction care for acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department (ED).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to December 31, 2022, with an additional search conducted up to August 31, 2024. Databases searched included Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, DARE, PROSPERO, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. We reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses on assessment and intervention for acute anterior shoulder dislocation. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the GRADE approach, while the methodology was assessed using AMSTAR 2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From an initial 1345 records, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. These included 4 articles on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), 5 on analgesia and anesthesia, 3 on closed reduction techniques, 10 on surgical Bankart repair, 9 comparing external and internal rotation immobilization, and 1 on nerve injuries, including duplicates. POCUS demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy comparable to radiography for shoulder dislocations and associated fractures. Analgesia and anesthesia studies showed that intra-articular anesthesia (IAA) is as effective as intravenous sedation (IVS) with fewer adverse events and shorter ED stays. Three meta-analyses on closed reduction techniques revealed no significant differences in success rates among various methods, but the FARES method was noted for superior pain management. Ten reviews on surgical Bankart repair consistently showed reduced redislocation rates, especially in younger patients, compared to non-surgical treatments including internal and external rotation immobilization. Four recent reviews reported external rotation immobilization was more effective than internal rotation in preventing redislocations. Nerve injuries were common, with the axillary nerve most frequently affected.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Emergency physicians managing anterior shoulder dislocation should employ POCUS for diagnosis, prioritize intra-articular anesthesia, master various reduction techniques including the FARES method, refer patients to an orthopedic surgeon for follow-up and potential surgery to prevent redislocation, and be vigilant about nerve damage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724005084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence on accurate and rapid diagnostic methods, effective and safe shoulder dislocation reduction techniques, pharmacological treatment, and post-reduction care for acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to December 31, 2022, with an additional search conducted up to August 31, 2024. Databases searched included Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, DARE, PROSPERO, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. We reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses on assessment and intervention for acute anterior shoulder dislocation. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the GRADE approach, while the methodology was assessed using AMSTAR 2.

Results

From an initial 1345 records, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. These included 4 articles on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), 5 on analgesia and anesthesia, 3 on closed reduction techniques, 10 on surgical Bankart repair, 9 comparing external and internal rotation immobilization, and 1 on nerve injuries, including duplicates. POCUS demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy comparable to radiography for shoulder dislocations and associated fractures. Analgesia and anesthesia studies showed that intra-articular anesthesia (IAA) is as effective as intravenous sedation (IVS) with fewer adverse events and shorter ED stays. Three meta-analyses on closed reduction techniques revealed no significant differences in success rates among various methods, but the FARES method was noted for superior pain management. Ten reviews on surgical Bankart repair consistently showed reduced redislocation rates, especially in younger patients, compared to non-surgical treatments including internal and external rotation immobilization. Four recent reviews reported external rotation immobilization was more effective than internal rotation in preventing redislocations. Nerve injuries were common, with the axillary nerve most frequently affected.

Conclusions

Emergency physicians managing anterior shoulder dislocation should employ POCUS for diagnosis, prioritize intra-articular anesthesia, master various reduction techniques including the FARES method, refer patients to an orthopedic surgeon for follow-up and potential surgery to prevent redislocation, and be vigilant about nerve damage.
对急性肩关节脱位评估和治疗的系统综述和荟萃分析进行总体回顾。
研究目的本研究旨在对急诊科(ED)急性肩关节前脱位的准确快速诊断方法、有效安全的肩关节脱位复位技术、药物治疗以及复位后护理的现有证据进行全面综述:我们对截至 2022 年 12 月 31 日的文献进行了系统性回顾,并对截至 2024 年 8 月 31 日的文献进行了补充检索。检索的数据库包括 Cochrane 系统综述数据库、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、DARE、PROSPERO、OpenGrey 和 Google Scholar。我们回顾了有关急性肩关节前脱位的评估和干预的系统综述和荟萃分析。数据提取和质量评估由两名审稿人独立完成。证据质量使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和 GRADE 方法进行评估,方法则使用 AMSTAR 2.Results 进行评估:在最初的 1345 条记录中,有 30 项研究符合纳入标准。其中包括 4 篇关于护理点超声(POCUS)的文章、5 篇关于镇痛和麻醉的文章、3 篇关于闭合复位技术的文章、10 篇关于 Bankart 修复手术的文章、9 篇比较外旋和内旋固定的文章以及 1 篇关于神经损伤的文章(包括重复文章)。POCUS 对肩关节脱位和相关骨折的诊断准确率很高,可媲美放射摄影。镇痛和麻醉研究表明,关节内麻醉(IAA)与静脉镇静(IVS)同样有效,不良反应更少,急诊室停留时间更短。关于闭合复位技术的三项荟萃分析显示,各种方法的成功率无明显差异,但 FARES 方法在疼痛控制方面更胜一筹。十篇关于 Bankart 修复手术的综述一致显示,与包括内旋和外旋固定在内的非手术疗法相比,再脱位率降低,尤其是年轻患者。最近的四篇综述报告称,在防止再次脱位方面,外旋固定比内旋固定更有效。神经损伤很常见,腋神经最常受到影响:结论:急诊医生在处理肩关节前脱位时应使用POCUS进行诊断,优先考虑关节内麻醉,掌握包括FARES法在内的各种复位技术,将患者转诊至骨科医生进行随访和可能的手术以防止再次脱位,并警惕神经损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信