Joke Maria Wielenga, April Pascual, Kiki Ruhe, Christ Jan van Ganzewinkel
{"title":"Heel Warming in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Newborns for Capillary Blood Sampling.","authors":"Joke Maria Wielenga, April Pascual, Kiki Ruhe, Christ Jan van Ganzewinkel","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if performing heel stick procedures for capillary blood sampling without prior heel warming is noninferior to the standard practice of warming the heel in very-low-birth-weight newborns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Noninferiority randomized control trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place in two Level 3 NICUs in The Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Newborns born at less than 32 weeks gestation in their second or third week of life without an arterial line in situ or known coagulopathy (N = 100).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized participants to undergo a heel stick procedure in one of two groups: without heel warming (n = 50) and heel warming with a washcloth warmed with 37 °C tap water (n = 25) or with a microwaved hot pack (n = 25). The primary outcome was length of time for obtaining the required blood sample. The secondary outcomes were number of attempts, reliability of the blood sample, newborn comfort, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed no differences in background characteristics between groups and found no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in primary or secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among participants, not warming the heel before a heel stick was noninferior to warming the heel. Therefore, preheating the heel as a standard of care may be an unnecessary nursing intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.09.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine if performing heel stick procedures for capillary blood sampling without prior heel warming is noninferior to the standard practice of warming the heel in very-low-birth-weight newborns.
Design: Noninferiority randomized control trial.
Setting: The study took place in two Level 3 NICUs in The Netherlands.
Participants: Newborns born at less than 32 weeks gestation in their second or third week of life without an arterial line in situ or known coagulopathy (N = 100).
Methods: We randomized participants to undergo a heel stick procedure in one of two groups: without heel warming (n = 50) and heel warming with a washcloth warmed with 37 °C tap water (n = 25) or with a microwaved hot pack (n = 25). The primary outcome was length of time for obtaining the required blood sample. The secondary outcomes were number of attempts, reliability of the blood sample, newborn comfort, and adverse events.
Results: We observed no differences in background characteristics between groups and found no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in primary or secondary outcomes.
Conclusion: Among participants, not warming the heel before a heel stick was noninferior to warming the heel. Therefore, preheating the heel as a standard of care may be an unnecessary nursing intervention.
期刊介绍:
JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.