Clinical impact of TP53 functional mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae277
Annamaria Ruzzo, Francesco Graziano, Silvia Palladino, Nicholas W Fischer, Vincenzo Catalano, Paolo Giordani, David Malkin, Tiziana Tamburrano, Alberto Patriti, Filippo Petrelli, Donatella Sarti, Rita Chiari
{"title":"Clinical impact of TP53 functional mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy.","authors":"Annamaria Ruzzo, Francesco Graziano, Silvia Palladino, Nicholas W Fischer, Vincenzo Catalano, Paolo Giordani, David Malkin, Tiziana Tamburrano, Alberto Patriti, Filippo Petrelli, Donatella Sarti, Rita Chiari","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical and experimental studies indicate that the tumor protein p53 (TP53) gene loss of function due to missense mutations (MMs) may confer sensitivity to anti-angiogenics. This effect seems to be linked to cross-talk mechanisms among TP53, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and VEGF receptors. We investigated whether specific TP53 MMs are associated with clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab. The study focused on KRAS-mutated, liver-only mCRC cases as a homogeneous subgroup that may represent a relevant setting for exploring this association.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MMs were identified on primary tumors. MMs were classified by mutant-specific residual transcriptional activity scores (TP53RTAS) as transcriptionally inactive (TP53inactive = TP53RTAS 0%) or active (TP53active = TP53RTAS ≥ 1%) and used for stratifying patients in progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and overall survival (OS) analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 62 patients. MMs were found in 39 cases (62%) with 16 having TP53inactive and 23 TP53active MMs. Patients with TP53inactive MMs showed better PFS in comparison with the remaining groups (wild-type and TP53active). This effect was retained in the multivariate model. A similar clinical impact was observed in the OS analysis. There was a significant difference in the overall response rate and rate of post-treatment resection of liver metastases between the TP53inactive and the wild-type or TP53active MMs cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specific TP53 MMs may identify sub-groups of patients who benefit from Bevacizumab-based systemic therapy and these findings could lead to novel tailored treatment strategies in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical and experimental studies indicate that the tumor protein p53 (TP53) gene loss of function due to missense mutations (MMs) may confer sensitivity to anti-angiogenics. This effect seems to be linked to cross-talk mechanisms among TP53, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and VEGF receptors. We investigated whether specific TP53 MMs are associated with clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab. The study focused on KRAS-mutated, liver-only mCRC cases as a homogeneous subgroup that may represent a relevant setting for exploring this association.

Materials and methods: MMs were identified on primary tumors. MMs were classified by mutant-specific residual transcriptional activity scores (TP53RTAS) as transcriptionally inactive (TP53inactive = TP53RTAS 0%) or active (TP53active = TP53RTAS ≥ 1%) and used for stratifying patients in progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and overall survival (OS) analyses.

Results: The study population consisted of 62 patients. MMs were found in 39 cases (62%) with 16 having TP53inactive and 23 TP53active MMs. Patients with TP53inactive MMs showed better PFS in comparison with the remaining groups (wild-type and TP53active). This effect was retained in the multivariate model. A similar clinical impact was observed in the OS analysis. There was a significant difference in the overall response rate and rate of post-treatment resection of liver metastases between the TP53inactive and the wild-type or TP53active MMs cases.

Conclusions: Specific TP53 MMs may identify sub-groups of patients who benefit from Bevacizumab-based systemic therapy and these findings could lead to novel tailored treatment strategies in this setting.

TP53功能突变对接受贝伐单抗和化疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的临床影响。
背景:临床和实验研究表明,错义突变(MMs)导致的肿瘤蛋白 p53(TP53)基因功能缺失可能会使患者对抗血管生成素敏感。这种效应似乎与 TP53、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和 VEGF 受体之间的交叉对话机制有关。我们研究了特定的 TP53 MMs 是否与接受一线化疗加贝伐单抗治疗的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的临床预后有关。研究重点关注KRAS突变、仅肝脏转移的mCRC病例,这是一个同质亚组,可能是探索这种关联的相关环境:在原发肿瘤上识别 MMs。根据突变特异性残余转录活性评分(TP53RTAS)将MMs分为转录不活跃(TP53inactive = TP53RTAS 0%)或活跃(TP53active = TP53RTAS ≥ 1%)两种,并在无进展生存期(PFS)、反应率和总生存期(OS)分析中对患者进行分层:研究对象包括 62 例患者。39例(62%)患者中发现了MMs,其中16例为TP53活性MMs,23例为TP53活性MMs。与其他组别(野生型和TP53活性组)相比,TP53活性组患者的PFS较好。这一效应在多变量模型中得以保留。在 OS 分析中也观察到了类似的临床影响。TP53无活性与野生型或TP53活性MMs病例的总体反应率和治疗后肝转移灶切除率存在明显差异:结论:特异性TP53 MMs可确定从贝伐珠单抗系统治疗中获益的亚组患者,这些发现可能会为这种情况带来新的定制治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信