Early prediction of sepsis in emergency department patients using various methods and scoring systems.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1111/nicc.13201
Yun-Feng Song, Hao-Neng Huang, Jia-Jun Ma, Rui Xing, Yu-Qi Song, Li Li, Jin Zhou, Chun-Quan Ou
{"title":"Early prediction of sepsis in emergency department patients using various methods and scoring systems.","authors":"Yun-Feng Song, Hao-Neng Huang, Jia-Jun Ma, Rui Xing, Yu-Qi Song, Li Li, Jin Zhou, Chun-Quan Ou","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early recognition of sepsis, a common life-threatening condition in intensive care units (ICUs), is beneficial for improving patient outcomes. However, most sepsis prediction models were trained and assessed in the ICU, which might not apply to emergency department (ED) settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish an early predictive model based on basic but essential information collected upon ED presentation for the follow-up diagnosis of sepsis observed in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study developed and validated a reliable model of sepsis prediction among ED patients by comparing 10 different methods based on retrospective electronic health record data from the MIMIC-IV database. In-ICU sepsis was identified as the primary outcome. The potential predictors encompassed baseline demographics, vital signs, pain scale, chief complaints and Emergency Severity Index (ESI). 80% and 20% of the total of 425 737 ED visit records were randomly selected for the train set and the test set for model development and validation, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the methods evaluated, XGBoost demonstrated an optimal predictive performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.90-0.91). Logistic regression exhibited a comparable predictive ability to XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.89-0.90), along with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% (95% CI: 0.83-0.86) and 78% (95% CI: 0.77-0.80), respectively. Neither of the five commonly used severity scoring systems demonstrated satisfactory performance for sepsis prediction. The predictive ability of using ESI as the sole predictor (AUC: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.78-0.80) was also inferior to the model integrating ESI and other basic information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of ESI combined with basic clinical information upon ED presentation accurately predicted sepsis among ED patients, strengthening its application in ED.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The proposed model may assist nurses in risk stratification management and prioritize interventions for potential sepsis patients, even in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"e13201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early recognition of sepsis, a common life-threatening condition in intensive care units (ICUs), is beneficial for improving patient outcomes. However, most sepsis prediction models were trained and assessed in the ICU, which might not apply to emergency department (ED) settings.

Aim: To establish an early predictive model based on basic but essential information collected upon ED presentation for the follow-up diagnosis of sepsis observed in the ICU.

Study design: This study developed and validated a reliable model of sepsis prediction among ED patients by comparing 10 different methods based on retrospective electronic health record data from the MIMIC-IV database. In-ICU sepsis was identified as the primary outcome. The potential predictors encompassed baseline demographics, vital signs, pain scale, chief complaints and Emergency Severity Index (ESI). 80% and 20% of the total of 425 737 ED visit records were randomly selected for the train set and the test set for model development and validation, respectively.

Results: Among the methods evaluated, XGBoost demonstrated an optimal predictive performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.90-0.91). Logistic regression exhibited a comparable predictive ability to XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.89-0.90), along with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% (95% CI: 0.83-0.86) and 78% (95% CI: 0.77-0.80), respectively. Neither of the five commonly used severity scoring systems demonstrated satisfactory performance for sepsis prediction. The predictive ability of using ESI as the sole predictor (AUC: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.78-0.80) was also inferior to the model integrating ESI and other basic information.

Conclusions: The use of ESI combined with basic clinical information upon ED presentation accurately predicted sepsis among ED patients, strengthening its application in ED.

Relevance to clinical practice: The proposed model may assist nurses in risk stratification management and prioritize interventions for potential sepsis patients, even in low-resource settings.

使用各种方法和评分系统及早预测急诊科患者的败血症。
背景:脓毒症是重症监护病房(ICU)中常见的危及生命的疾病,早期识别脓毒症有利于改善患者预后。然而,大多数脓毒症预测模型都是在重症监护室中进行训练和评估的,这可能不适用于急诊科(ED):研究设计:本研究基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库中的回顾性电子健康记录数据,通过比较 10 种不同的方法,开发并验证了一种可靠的 ED 患者败血症预测模型。重症监护室内脓毒症被确定为主要结果。潜在的预测因素包括基线人口统计学、生命体征、疼痛量表、主诉和急诊严重程度指数(ESI)。在总共 425 737 份急诊室就诊记录中,分别随机抽取 80% 和 20% 作为训练集和测试集,用于模型开发和验证:在所有评估方法中,XGBoost 的预测性能最佳,曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.90(95% CI:0.90-0.91)。逻辑回归的预测能力与 XGBoost 相当,AUC 为 0.89(95% CI:0.89-0.90),灵敏度和特异性分别为 85%(95% CI:0.83-0.86)和 78%(95% CI:0.77-0.80)。五种常用的严重程度评分系统在脓毒症预测方面都没有令人满意的表现。将ESI作为唯一预测指标的预测能力(AUC:0.79,95% CI:0.78-0.80)也不如综合ESI和其他基本信息的模型:结论:在急诊科就诊时使用ESI结合基本临床信息可准确预测急诊科患者的败血症,加强了其在急诊科的应用:建议的模型可帮助护士进行风险分层管理,并确定对潜在败血症患者进行干预的优先次序,即使在资源匮乏的环境中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信