Clinical Pilot of a Deep Learning Elastic Registration Algorithm to Improve Misregistration Artifact and Image Quality on Routine Oncologic PET/CT.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jordan H Chamberlin, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, James Hamill, Ismail M Kabakus, Kevin P Horn, Jim O'Doherty, Saeed Elojeimy
{"title":"Clinical Pilot of a Deep Learning Elastic Registration Algorithm to Improve Misregistration Artifact and Image Quality on Routine Oncologic PET/CT.","authors":"Jordan H Chamberlin, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, James Hamill, Ismail M Kabakus, Kevin P Horn, Jim O'Doherty, Saeed Elojeimy","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Misregistration artifacts between the PET and attenuation correction CT (CTAC) exams can degrade image quality and cause diagnostic errors. Deep learning (DL)-warped elastic registration methods have been proposed to improve misregistration errors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>30 patients undergoing routine oncologic examination (20 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and 10 <sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT) were retrospectively identified and compared using unmodified CTAC, and a DL-augmented spatial transformation CT attenuation map. Primary endpoints included differences in subjective image quality and standardized uptake values (SUV). Exams were randomized to reduce reader bias, and three radiologists rated image quality across six anatomic sites using a modified Likert scale. Measures of local bias and lesion SUV were also quantitatively evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL attenuation correction methods were associated with higher image quality and reduced misregistration artifacts (Mean <sup>18</sup>F-FDG quality rating=3.5-3.8 for DL vs 3.2-3.5 for standard reconstruction (STD); Mean <sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE quality rating= 3.2-3.4 for DL vs 2.1-3.3; P < 0.05 for STD, for all except <sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE inferior spleen). Percent change in superior liver SUV<sub>mean</sub> for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE were 5.3 ± 4.9 and 8.2 ± 4.1%, respectively. Measures of signal-to-noise ratio were significantly improved for the DL over STD (Hepatopulmonary index (HPI) [<sup>18</sup>F-FDG] = 4.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001; HPI [<sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE] = 16.4 ± 16.9 vs 12.5 ± 5.5, P = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning elastic registration for CT attenuation correction maps on routine oncology PET/CT decreases misregistration artifacts, with a greater impact on PET scans with longer acquisition times.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Misregistration artifacts between the PET and attenuation correction CT (CTAC) exams can degrade image quality and cause diagnostic errors. Deep learning (DL)-warped elastic registration methods have been proposed to improve misregistration errors.

Materials and methods: 30 patients undergoing routine oncologic examination (20 18F-FDG PET/CT and 10 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT) were retrospectively identified and compared using unmodified CTAC, and a DL-augmented spatial transformation CT attenuation map. Primary endpoints included differences in subjective image quality and standardized uptake values (SUV). Exams were randomized to reduce reader bias, and three radiologists rated image quality across six anatomic sites using a modified Likert scale. Measures of local bias and lesion SUV were also quantitatively evaluated.

Results: The DL attenuation correction methods were associated with higher image quality and reduced misregistration artifacts (Mean 18F-FDG quality rating=3.5-3.8 for DL vs 3.2-3.5 for standard reconstruction (STD); Mean 64Cu-DOTATATE quality rating= 3.2-3.4 for DL vs 2.1-3.3; P < 0.05 for STD, for all except 64Cu-DOTATATE inferior spleen). Percent change in superior liver SUVmean for 18F-FDG and 64Cu-DOTATATE were 5.3 ± 4.9 and 8.2 ± 4.1%, respectively. Measures of signal-to-noise ratio were significantly improved for the DL over STD (Hepatopulmonary index (HPI) [18F-FDG] = 4.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001; HPI [64Cu-DOTATATE] = 16.4 ± 16.9 vs 12.5 ± 5.5, P = 0.039).

Conclusion: Deep learning elastic registration for CT attenuation correction maps on routine oncology PET/CT decreases misregistration artifacts, with a greater impact on PET scans with longer acquisition times.

深度学习弹性配准算法的临床试验,以改善常规肿瘤 PET/CT 的配准误差和图像质量。
理由和目标:PET 和衰减校正 CT(CTAC)检查之间的错误配准伪影会降低图像质量并导致诊断错误。材料和方法:对接受常规肿瘤检查的 30 名患者(20 名 18F-FDG PET/CT 和 10 名 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT)进行回顾性鉴定,并使用未修改的 CTAC 和 DL 增强空间变换 CT 衰减图进行比较。主要终点包括主观图像质量和标准化摄取值(SUV)的差异。检查是随机进行的,以减少读者偏差,三位放射科医生使用改良的李克特量表对六个解剖部位的图像质量进行评分。此外,还对局部偏差和病变 SUV 进行了定量评估:DL衰减校正方法与更高的图像质量和更少的错误定位伪影有关(DL的平均18F-FDG质量评分=3.5-3.8 vs 标准重建(STD)的3.2-3.5;DL的平均64Cu-DOTATATE质量评分=3.2-3.4 vs 2.1-3.3;P 64Cu-DOTATATE下脾脏)。18F-FDG和64Cu-DOTATATE的上肝脏SUVmean变化百分比分别为5.3 ± 4.9和8.2 ± 4.1%。与 STD 相比,DL 的信噪比显著提高(肝肺指数 (HPI) [18F-FDG] = 4.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.0 ± 1.1,64Cu-DOTATATE] = 16.4 ± 16.9 vs 12.5 ± 5.5,P = 0.039):结论:对常规肿瘤 PET/CT 进行 CT 衰减校正图的深度学习弹性配准可减少错误配准伪影,对采集时间较长的 PET 扫描影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信