The value of a multimodal approach combining radical surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy in the recurrence treatment of gynecological malignancies - analysis of a large patient cohort in a tertiary care center.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Tanja Sprave, Raluca Stoian, Natalia Volegova-Neher, Mark Gainey, Michael Kollefrath, Dimos Baltas, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Rieke Schröder, Florin-Andrei Taran
{"title":"The value of a multimodal approach combining radical surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy in the recurrence treatment of gynecological malignancies - analysis of a large patient cohort in a tertiary care center.","authors":"Tanja Sprave, Raluca Stoian, Natalia Volegova-Neher, Mark Gainey, Michael Kollefrath, Dimos Baltas, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Rieke Schröder, Florin-Andrei Taran","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02537-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent and locally advanced gynecological malignancies have a poor prognosis. In particularly, pelvic local recurrence after previous radiotherapy and/or positive resection margins during surgical treatment for recurrent disease result in low survival rates. Consequently, locoregional control is of utmost importance in this cohort of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes and determine prognostic factors for patients treated with surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for recurrent and locally advanced gynecological malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>40 patients who underwent surgical treatment and IORT between 2010 and 2022 were eligible for inclusion. The median follow-up time was 22 months. The outcomes measured were locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and survival without distant metastases (DMFS). The Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to assess the impact of patient variables and treatment factors on the endpoints mentioned. The following variables were analyzed: age at surgical treatment and IORT and initial diagnosis (< 65 vs. ≥65 years, each), disease-free interval (DFI) between initial diagnosis and first recurrence, DFI to surgical treatment and IORT, grading, histology, IORT dose (≤ 13 vs. >13 Gy) and technique (high dose radiotherapy (HDR) vs. IORT using electrons, (IOERT)). Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean IORT dose was 13.8 Gy (range 10-18 Gy). Cervical carcinoma was most frequently found in 27.5% of patients followed by endometrial carcinoma and vulvar carcinoma in 25% respectively. The final histopathologic results after surgery with IORT showed no residual tumour in 24 patients (60%), microscopic residual disease in 5 patients (12.5%), resection status could not be evaluated in three patients (7.5%) and the resection status was unknown in eight patients (20%). Subsequently, 27.5% of patients also received adjuvant radiotherapy of the local recurrence bed. However, after IORT, 65% of the women suffered a recurrence. Of these, the recurrences were localized: in-field 32.5%, out-of-field 22.5% and margin-of-field 12.5%. The 3- and 5-year OS was 69% and 55% respectively. The 3- and 5-year LRC was 56% respectively. The 3- and 5-year DMFS was 66% and 49%. Whereas the comparison between groups by IORT dose level (≤ 13 vs. >13 Gy) showed a non-significant trend in favor of the higher dose only for OS (p = 0.094), but not in LRC and DMFS (p > 0.05). OS and DMFS, but not LRC, differed significantly between the HDR-IORT and IOERT groups (p = 0.06 and p = 0.03,) in favor of the HDR-IORT technique. For HDR-IORT technique a trend towards superior OS and LRC was observed in the univariate analysis: HR 3.76, CI 95%: 0.95-14.881, p = 0.059 and HR 2.165 CI 95%: 0.916-5.114, p = 0.078 CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate for pelvic recurrence in gynecological malignancies remains poor and comparable with historical data from the last two decades. Particularly HDR-IORT, appears to provide a long-term oncological benefit in carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02537-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrent and locally advanced gynecological malignancies have a poor prognosis. In particularly, pelvic local recurrence after previous radiotherapy and/or positive resection margins during surgical treatment for recurrent disease result in low survival rates. Consequently, locoregional control is of utmost importance in this cohort of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes and determine prognostic factors for patients treated with surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for recurrent and locally advanced gynecological malignancies.

Methods: 40 patients who underwent surgical treatment and IORT between 2010 and 2022 were eligible for inclusion. The median follow-up time was 22 months. The outcomes measured were locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and survival without distant metastases (DMFS). The Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to assess the impact of patient variables and treatment factors on the endpoints mentioned. The following variables were analyzed: age at surgical treatment and IORT and initial diagnosis (< 65 vs. ≥65 years, each), disease-free interval (DFI) between initial diagnosis and first recurrence, DFI to surgical treatment and IORT, grading, histology, IORT dose (≤ 13 vs. >13 Gy) and technique (high dose radiotherapy (HDR) vs. IORT using electrons, (IOERT)). Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: The mean IORT dose was 13.8 Gy (range 10-18 Gy). Cervical carcinoma was most frequently found in 27.5% of patients followed by endometrial carcinoma and vulvar carcinoma in 25% respectively. The final histopathologic results after surgery with IORT showed no residual tumour in 24 patients (60%), microscopic residual disease in 5 patients (12.5%), resection status could not be evaluated in three patients (7.5%) and the resection status was unknown in eight patients (20%). Subsequently, 27.5% of patients also received adjuvant radiotherapy of the local recurrence bed. However, after IORT, 65% of the women suffered a recurrence. Of these, the recurrences were localized: in-field 32.5%, out-of-field 22.5% and margin-of-field 12.5%. The 3- and 5-year OS was 69% and 55% respectively. The 3- and 5-year LRC was 56% respectively. The 3- and 5-year DMFS was 66% and 49%. Whereas the comparison between groups by IORT dose level (≤ 13 vs. >13 Gy) showed a non-significant trend in favor of the higher dose only for OS (p = 0.094), but not in LRC and DMFS (p > 0.05). OS and DMFS, but not LRC, differed significantly between the HDR-IORT and IOERT groups (p = 0.06 and p = 0.03,) in favor of the HDR-IORT technique. For HDR-IORT technique a trend towards superior OS and LRC was observed in the univariate analysis: HR 3.76, CI 95%: 0.95-14.881, p = 0.059 and HR 2.165 CI 95%: 0.916-5.114, p = 0.078 CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate for pelvic recurrence in gynecological malignancies remains poor and comparable with historical data from the last two decades. Particularly HDR-IORT, appears to provide a long-term oncological benefit in carefully selected patients.

结合根治性手术和术中放疗的多模式方法在治疗妇科恶性肿瘤复发中的价值--对一家三级医疗中心大型患者队列的分析。
背景:复发和局部晚期妇科恶性肿瘤的预后较差。特别是,既往放疗后盆腔局部复发和/或手术治疗复发疾病时切除边缘阳性会导致低生存率。因此,对这类患者进行局部控制至关重要。本研究旨在分析复发和局部晚期妇科恶性肿瘤手术和术中放疗(IORT)患者的治疗效果,并确定预后因素。中位随访时间为 22 个月。测量的结果包括局部控制(LRC)、总生存期(OS)和无远处转移生存期(DMFS)。Cox比例危险模型用于单变量和多变量分析,以评估患者变量和治疗因素对上述终点的影响。分析了以下变量:手术治疗和IORT时的年龄、初始诊断(13 Gy)和技术(高剂量放疗(HDR)与使用电子的IORT(IOERT))。采用卡普兰-梅耶法生成生存曲线:平均IORT剂量为13.8 Gy(范围10-18 Gy)。宫颈癌最常见,占 27.5%,其次是子宫内膜癌和外阴癌,分别占 25%。IORT 手术后的最终组织病理学结果显示,24 名患者(60%)无肿瘤残留,5 名患者(12.5%)有显微残留,3 名患者(7.5%)无法评估切除情况,8 名患者(20%)切除情况不明。随后,27.5%的患者还接受了局部复发床的辅助放疗。然而,在 IORT 后,65% 的女性患者复发。其中,局部复发的比例分别为:场内 32.5%、场外 22.5%、场边缘 12.5%。3年和5年的OS分别为69%和55%。3年和5年的LRC分别为56%。3年和5年的DMFS分别为66%和49%。按IORT剂量水平(≤ 13 Gy vs. >13 Gy)进行的组间比较显示,只有在OS(P = 0.094)方面,高剂量组的趋势不显著,但在LRC和DMFS方面,高剂量组的趋势不显著(P > 0.05)。HDR-IORT组和IOERT组的OS和DMFS有显著差异(p = 0.06和p = 0.03),但LRC无显著差异,HDR-IORT技术更优。在单变量分析中,HDR-IORT 技术的 OS 和 LRC 均呈上升趋势:HR 3.76,CI 95%:HR 3.76,CI 95%:0.95-14.881,p = 0.059;HR 2.165,CI 95%:0.916-5.114,p = 0.059:0.916-5.114, p = 0.078 结论:妇科恶性肿瘤盆腔复发的生存率仍然很低,与过去二十年的历史数据不相上下。尤其是 HDR-IORT,似乎能为精心挑选的患者带来长期的肿瘤学益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信