Anterior Cruciate Ligament Allograft Reconstruction in Females Can Produce Outcomes Comparable to Those of Autografts in Male Counterparts.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Sung Bae Park, Yong Seuk Lee
{"title":"Anterior Cruciate Ligament Allograft Reconstruction in Females Can Produce Outcomes Comparable to Those of Autografts in Male Counterparts.","authors":"Sung Bae Park, Yong Seuk Lee","doi":"10.1055/a-2451-6685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are unique anatomic and geometric risk factors that contribute to higher injury rates of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in women. Allografts are an important alternative option for female patients.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. The case group comprised female patients with ACL allograft reconstruction, and the control group comprised male patients with ACL reconstruction. Functional and clinical evaluations were based on the pre- and postoperative Cybex test, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and objective measurement criteria, and Tegner Activity Scale questionnaires. Radiological comparisons were performed using the femorotibial angle (FTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), and intercondylar notch width (INW). The roof inclination angle (RIA) was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups [female (44) and male (88)] had an average follow-up period of 57.9±19.3 months and average ages of 36.5±10.9 and 35.2±11.7 years, respectively. Functional and clinical outcomes showed no differences between the groups, except that the return to the pre-injury activity level was higher in the female group (95% vs. 77%, P<0.001). The female group showed larger FTA and PTS and smaller INW and RIA than those of the male group (P<0.001, 0.008, <0.001 and 0.035, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female ACL allograft reconstruction showed comparable outcomes to those of their male counterparts, and the return to pre-injury activity levels was significantly higher in women. However, women showed lower activity levels and were more vulnerable to geometric risk factors than their male counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2451-6685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are unique anatomic and geometric risk factors that contribute to higher injury rates of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in women. Allografts are an important alternative option for female patients.

Materials & methods: Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. The case group comprised female patients with ACL allograft reconstruction, and the control group comprised male patients with ACL reconstruction. Functional and clinical evaluations were based on the pre- and postoperative Cybex test, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and objective measurement criteria, and Tegner Activity Scale questionnaires. Radiological comparisons were performed using the femorotibial angle (FTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), and intercondylar notch width (INW). The roof inclination angle (RIA) was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: The two groups [female (44) and male (88)] had an average follow-up period of 57.9±19.3 months and average ages of 36.5±10.9 and 35.2±11.7 years, respectively. Functional and clinical outcomes showed no differences between the groups, except that the return to the pre-injury activity level was higher in the female group (95% vs. 77%, P<0.001). The female group showed larger FTA and PTS and smaller INW and RIA than those of the male group (P<0.001, 0.008, <0.001 and 0.035, respectively).

Conclusion: Female ACL allograft reconstruction showed comparable outcomes to those of their male counterparts, and the return to pre-injury activity levels was significantly higher in women. However, women showed lower activity levels and were more vulnerable to geometric risk factors than their male counterparts.

女性前交叉韧带同种异体移植物重建术的疗效可与男性自体移植物相媲美。
导言:女性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤率较高的原因在于其独特的解剖和几何风险因素。同种异体移植是女性患者的重要替代选择:对接受初级前交叉韧带重建术的患者进行回顾性评估。病例组由接受前交叉韧带同种异体移植重建术的女性患者组成,对照组由接受前交叉韧带重建术的男性患者组成。功能和临床评估基于术前和术后的 Cybex 测试、Lysholm 评分、国际膝关节文献委员会主观和客观测量标准以及 Tegner 活动量表调查问卷。采用股胫骨角(FTA)、胫骨后斜度(PTS)和髁间切迹宽度(INW)进行放射学比较。顶倾角(RIA)通过磁共振成像进行评估:两组患者(女性(44 例)和男性(88 例))的平均随访时间为(57.9±19.3)个月,平均年龄分别为(36.5±10.9)岁和(35.2±11.7)岁。除了女性组恢复到受伤前活动水平的比例更高(95% 对 77%,结论:女性前交叉韧带同种异体移植物重建术的恢复率更高,而男性前交叉韧带同种异体移植物重建术的恢复率更低)外,两组的功能和临床结果无差异:女性前交叉韧带同种异体移植重建的结果与男性相当,女性恢复到受伤前活动水平的比例明显更高。不过,与男性相比,女性的活动量更少,更容易受到几何风险因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信