Breast cancer survival prediction using an automated mitosis detection pipeline

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Nikolas Stathonikos, Marc Aubreville, Sjoerd de Vries, Frauke Wilm, Christof A Bertram, Mitko Veta, Paul J van Diest
{"title":"Breast cancer survival prediction using an automated mitosis detection pipeline","authors":"Nikolas Stathonikos,&nbsp;Marc Aubreville,&nbsp;Sjoerd de Vries,&nbsp;Frauke Wilm,&nbsp;Christof A Bertram,&nbsp;Mitko Veta,&nbsp;Paul J van Diest","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mitotic count (MC) is the most common measure to assess tumor proliferation in breast cancer patients and is highly predictive of patient outcomes. It is, however, subject to inter- and intraobserver variation and reproducibility challenges that may hamper its clinical utility. In past studies, artificial intelligence (AI)-supported MC has been shown to correlate well with traditional MC on glass slides. Considering the potential of AI to improve reproducibility of MC between pathologists, we undertook the next validation step by evaluating the prognostic value of a fully automatic method to detect and count mitoses on whole slide images using a deep learning model. The model was developed in the context of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge 2021 (MIDOG21) grand challenge and was expanded by a novel automatic area selector method to find the optimal mitotic hotspot and calculate the MC per 2 mm<sup>2</sup>. We employed this method on a breast cancer cohort with long-term follow-up from the University Medical Centre Utrecht (<i>N</i> = 912) and compared predictive values for overall survival of AI-based MC and light-microscopic MC, previously assessed during routine diagnostics. The MIDOG21 model was prognostically comparable to the original MC from the pathology report in uni- and multivariate survival analysis. In conclusion, a fully automated MC AI algorithm was validated in a large cohort of breast cancer with regard to retained prognostic value compared with traditional light-microscopic MC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.70008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mitotic count (MC) is the most common measure to assess tumor proliferation in breast cancer patients and is highly predictive of patient outcomes. It is, however, subject to inter- and intraobserver variation and reproducibility challenges that may hamper its clinical utility. In past studies, artificial intelligence (AI)-supported MC has been shown to correlate well with traditional MC on glass slides. Considering the potential of AI to improve reproducibility of MC between pathologists, we undertook the next validation step by evaluating the prognostic value of a fully automatic method to detect and count mitoses on whole slide images using a deep learning model. The model was developed in the context of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge 2021 (MIDOG21) grand challenge and was expanded by a novel automatic area selector method to find the optimal mitotic hotspot and calculate the MC per 2 mm2. We employed this method on a breast cancer cohort with long-term follow-up from the University Medical Centre Utrecht (N = 912) and compared predictive values for overall survival of AI-based MC and light-microscopic MC, previously assessed during routine diagnostics. The MIDOG21 model was prognostically comparable to the original MC from the pathology report in uni- and multivariate survival analysis. In conclusion, a fully automated MC AI algorithm was validated in a large cohort of breast cancer with regard to retained prognostic value compared with traditional light-microscopic MC.

Abstract Image

使用有丝分裂自动检测管道预测乳腺癌生存率。
有丝分裂计数(MC)是评估乳腺癌患者肿瘤增殖的最常用指标,对患者的预后有很高的预测性。然而,它受到观察者之间和观察者内部差异以及可重复性挑战的影响,可能会妨碍其临床实用性。在过去的研究中,人工智能(AI)支持的MC已被证明与玻璃载玻片上的传统MC有很好的相关性。考虑到人工智能在提高病理学家之间 MC 可重复性方面的潜力,我们进行了下一步验证,使用深度学习模型评估全自动方法的预后价值,以检测和计数整张玻片图像上的有丝分裂。该模型是在 "2021 年有丝分裂领域通用化挑战"(MIDOG21)大挑战的背景下开发的,并通过一种新颖的自动区域选择器方法进行了扩展,以找到最佳有丝分裂热点并计算每 2 平方毫米的有丝分裂率。我们在乌得勒支大学医学中心(University Medical Centre Utrecht)长期随访的乳腺癌队列(N = 912)中采用了这种方法,并比较了基于人工智能的有丝分裂率和光镜有丝分裂率(以前在常规诊断中评估过)对总生存期的预测值。在单变量和多变量生存分析中,MIDOG21 模型与病理报告中的原始 MC 在预后方面具有可比性。总之,与传统的光镜MC相比,全自动MC人工智能算法的预后价值在一大批乳腺癌患者中得到了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信