Talking body: the effect of body and voice anthropomorphism on perception of social agents.

IF 2.9 Q2 ROBOTICS
Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2024.1456613
Kashyap Haresamudram, Ilaria Torre, Magnus Behling, Christoph Wagner, Stefan Larsson
{"title":"Talking body: the effect of body and voice anthropomorphism on perception of social agents.","authors":"Kashyap Haresamudram, Ilaria Torre, Magnus Behling, Christoph Wagner, Stefan Larsson","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1456613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In human-agent interaction, trust is often measured using human-trust constructs such as competence, benevolence, and integrity, however, it is unclear whether technology-trust constructs such as functionality, helpfulness, and reliability are more suitable. There is also evidence that perception of \"humanness\" measured through anthropomorphism varies based on the characteristics of the agent, but dimensions of anthropomorphism are not highlighted in empirical studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to study how different embodiments and qualities of speech of agents influence type of trust and dimensions of anthropomorphism in perception of the agent, we conducted an experiment using two agent \"bodies\", a speaker and robot, employing four levels of \"humanness of voice\", and measured perception of the agent using human-trust, technology-trust, and Godspeed series questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the agents elicit both human and technology conceptions of trust with no significant difference, that differences in body and voice of an agent have no significant impact on trust, even though body and voice are both independently significant in anthropomorphism perception.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Interestingly, the results indicate that voice may be a stronger characteristic in influencing the perception of agents (not relating to trust) than physical appearance or body. We discuss the implications of our findings for research on human-agent interaction and highlight future research areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":"11 ","pages":"1456613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1456613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In human-agent interaction, trust is often measured using human-trust constructs such as competence, benevolence, and integrity, however, it is unclear whether technology-trust constructs such as functionality, helpfulness, and reliability are more suitable. There is also evidence that perception of "humanness" measured through anthropomorphism varies based on the characteristics of the agent, but dimensions of anthropomorphism are not highlighted in empirical studies.

Methods: In order to study how different embodiments and qualities of speech of agents influence type of trust and dimensions of anthropomorphism in perception of the agent, we conducted an experiment using two agent "bodies", a speaker and robot, employing four levels of "humanness of voice", and measured perception of the agent using human-trust, technology-trust, and Godspeed series questionnaires.

Results: We found that the agents elicit both human and technology conceptions of trust with no significant difference, that differences in body and voice of an agent have no significant impact on trust, even though body and voice are both independently significant in anthropomorphism perception.

Discussion: Interestingly, the results indicate that voice may be a stronger characteristic in influencing the perception of agents (not relating to trust) than physical appearance or body. We discuss the implications of our findings for research on human-agent interaction and highlight future research areas.

会说话的身体:身体和声音拟人化对感知社会代理的影响。
导言:在人与代理的互动中,信任通常使用能力、仁慈和正直等人与人之间的信任结构来衡量,然而,功能性、乐于助人和可靠性等技术与技术之间的信任结构是否更合适,目前尚不清楚。还有证据表明,通过拟人化衡量的 "人性化 "感知会因代理的特征而异,但拟人化的维度并没有在实证研究中得到强调:为了研究代理的不同体现方式和语音质量如何影响信任类型和代理感知中的拟人化维度,我们使用了两个代理 "躯体"--演讲者和机器人--进行了一项实验,采用了四个级别的 "语音人性化",并使用人类信任、技术信任和Godspeed系列问卷测量了代理的感知:结果:我们发现,代理引发的人类和技术信任概念没有显著差异,代理的肢体和声音差异对信任没有显著影响,尽管肢体和声音在拟人化感知中都具有独立意义:讨论:有趣的是,研究结果表明,在影响对代理人的感知(与信任无关)方面,声音可能是比外貌或身体更强的特征。我们将讨论我们的发现对人机交互研究的影响,并强调未来的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信