Macro-FSH is a rare cause of inappropriately high FSH concentrations.

IF 0.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Beatrice Mantovani, Rita Indirli, Valeria Lanzi, Iulia Petria, Maura Arosio, Giovanna Mantovani, Edgardo Somigliana, Matteo Vidali, Ferruccio Ceriotti, Emanuele Ferrante
{"title":"Macro-FSH is a rare cause of inappropriately high FSH concentrations.","authors":"Beatrice Mantovani, Rita Indirli, Valeria Lanzi, Iulia Petria, Maura Arosio, Giovanna Mantovani, Edgardo Somigliana, Matteo Vidali, Ferruccio Ceriotti, Emanuele Ferrante","doi":"10.1530/EDM-23-0144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Assessment of hormone concentrations can be subjected to laboratory pitfalls. Macro-hormones are hormone-autoantibody complexes which are cleared slowly from circulation and cause a false elevation in hormones' concentrations. Macro-prolactin and macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) are most frequently encountered while macro-follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) has been rarely reported. We describe the case of a 30-year-old woman who had a gynaecological consultation due to failure in achieving pregnancy after 8 months of unprotected intercourse. She had regular menses, did not complain of climacteric symptoms and her medical history was unremarkable. Antral follicle count and anti-mullerian hormone concentrations were normal, and regular ovulation was documented. Unexpectedly, high early follicular phase FSH concentrations were confirmed on two occasions (57 and 51 IU/L), raising the suspicion of primary ovarian insufficiency. After excluding Turner's syndrome and autoimmune oophoritis, a laboratory artifact was hypothesized. Following polyethylene glycol precipitation, FSH levels dropped from 41.1 IU/L to 6.54 IU/L (recovery 16%) and the presence of macro-FSH was concluded. Laboratory interference can lead to misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatments. A laboratory artifact should be suspected when inconsistency exists between clinical presentation and laboratory results. Only five other cases of macro-FSH have been reported to date. Although macro-hormones generally have low biological activity and do not require treatment, the role of anti-FSH antibodies has been hypothesized in primary ovarian insufficiency and in vitro fertilization failure.</p><p><strong>Learning points: </strong>Hormone quantification is a cornerstone in the diagnostic workup of endocrine disorders, but it can be subjected to laboratory interferences which can lead to unnecessary investigations and inappropriate treatments. A laboratory artifact should be suspected when a discrepancy is observed between clinical presentation and laboratory results, when extremely unusual analyte concentrations are observed and when inconsistent results are obtained by different analytical methods. Macro-hormones are hormone-autoantibody complexes which are cleared slowly from circulation and cause a false elevation in hormone concentrations. Macro-prolactin and macro-TSH are most frequently encountered, while macro-FSH has been rarely reported. Macro-hormones can be detected by polyethylene glycol precipitation, gel filtration chromatography, or by using protein G or protein A columns. Although macro-hormones generally have low biological activity and do not require treatment, the role of anti-FSH antibodies has been hypothesized in primary ovarian insufficiency and in vitro fertilization failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":37467,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EDM-23-0144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Assessment of hormone concentrations can be subjected to laboratory pitfalls. Macro-hormones are hormone-autoantibody complexes which are cleared slowly from circulation and cause a false elevation in hormones' concentrations. Macro-prolactin and macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) are most frequently encountered while macro-follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) has been rarely reported. We describe the case of a 30-year-old woman who had a gynaecological consultation due to failure in achieving pregnancy after 8 months of unprotected intercourse. She had regular menses, did not complain of climacteric symptoms and her medical history was unremarkable. Antral follicle count and anti-mullerian hormone concentrations were normal, and regular ovulation was documented. Unexpectedly, high early follicular phase FSH concentrations were confirmed on two occasions (57 and 51 IU/L), raising the suspicion of primary ovarian insufficiency. After excluding Turner's syndrome and autoimmune oophoritis, a laboratory artifact was hypothesized. Following polyethylene glycol precipitation, FSH levels dropped from 41.1 IU/L to 6.54 IU/L (recovery 16%) and the presence of macro-FSH was concluded. Laboratory interference can lead to misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatments. A laboratory artifact should be suspected when inconsistency exists between clinical presentation and laboratory results. Only five other cases of macro-FSH have been reported to date. Although macro-hormones generally have low biological activity and do not require treatment, the role of anti-FSH antibodies has been hypothesized in primary ovarian insufficiency and in vitro fertilization failure.

Learning points: Hormone quantification is a cornerstone in the diagnostic workup of endocrine disorders, but it can be subjected to laboratory interferences which can lead to unnecessary investigations and inappropriate treatments. A laboratory artifact should be suspected when a discrepancy is observed between clinical presentation and laboratory results, when extremely unusual analyte concentrations are observed and when inconsistent results are obtained by different analytical methods. Macro-hormones are hormone-autoantibody complexes which are cleared slowly from circulation and cause a false elevation in hormone concentrations. Macro-prolactin and macro-TSH are most frequently encountered, while macro-FSH has been rarely reported. Macro-hormones can be detected by polyethylene glycol precipitation, gel filtration chromatography, or by using protein G or protein A columns. Although macro-hormones generally have low biological activity and do not require treatment, the role of anti-FSH antibodies has been hypothesized in primary ovarian insufficiency and in vitro fertilization failure.

巨 FSH 是导致 FSH 浓度过高的一种罕见原因。
摘要:评估激素浓度可能存在实验室误区。巨型激素是激素-自身抗体复合物,从血液循环中清除的速度很慢,会导致激素浓度假性升高。巨泌乳素和巨促甲状腺激素(TSH)最常出现,而巨促卵泡激素(FSH)则鲜有报道。我们描述了一例 30 岁女性的病例,她因 8 个月无保护性交后未能怀孕而到妇科就诊。她的月经规律,没有抱怨气候性症状,病史也无异常。前卵泡计数和抗苗勒氏管激素浓度正常,有规律排卵的记录。意外的是,她两次证实早期卵泡期 FSH 浓度较高(分别为 57 和 51 IU/L),这引起了对原发性卵巢功能不全的怀疑。在排除了特纳综合征和自身免疫性卵巢炎的可能性后,假设是实验室人为因素造成的。经聚乙二醇沉淀后,FSH水平从41.1 IU/L降至6.54 IU/L(恢复16%),并得出大FSH存在的结论。实验室干扰可导致误诊和不必要的治疗。当临床表现与实验室结果不一致时,应怀疑实验室人为因素。迄今为止,仅有另外五例关于大促甲状腺激素的报道。虽然大激素的生物活性通常较低,不需要治疗,但有人假设抗FSH抗体在原发性卵巢功能不全和体外受精失败中起作用:激素定量是诊断内分泌失调的基石,但可能会受到实验室干扰,从而导致不必要的检查和不恰当的治疗。当观察到临床表现与实验室结果不一致时,当观察到分析物浓度极不寻常时,当不同分析方法得到的结果不一致时,都应怀疑实验室人为因素。巨荷尔蒙是荷尔蒙-自身抗体复合物,从血液循环中清除的速度很慢,会造成荷尔蒙浓度的假性升高。巨泌乳素和巨TSH最常出现,而巨FSH则鲜有报道。巨型激素可通过聚乙二醇沉淀法、凝胶过滤色谱法或使用蛋白 G 或蛋白 A 柱来检测。虽然大激素的生物活性通常较低,不需要治疗,但有人假设抗FSH抗体在原发性卵巢功能不全和体外受精失败中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports publishes case reports on common and rare conditions in all areas of clinical endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism. Articles should include clear learning points which readers can use to inform medical education or clinical practice. The types of cases of interest to Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports include: -Insight into disease pathogenesis or mechanism of therapy - Novel diagnostic procedure - Novel treatment - Unique/unexpected symptoms or presentations of a disease - New disease or syndrome: presentations/diagnosis/management - Unusual effects of medical treatment - Error in diagnosis/pitfalls and caveats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信