Prevention of perioperative anxiety: Interest of audiovisual distraction.

Q3 Medicine
Faten Haddad, Sirine Rais, Hajer Arfaoui, Emna Kammoun, Skander Naimi, M'hamed Sami Mebazaa
{"title":"Prevention of perioperative anxiety: Interest of audiovisual distraction.","authors":"Faten Haddad, Sirine Rais, Hajer Arfaoui, Emna Kammoun, Skander Naimi, M'hamed Sami Mebazaa","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.4468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Audiovisual distraction (AVD) is one of the non-pharmacological means of anxiety prevention. However, few studies have evaluated its perioperative effect in adults.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the contribution of audio-visual distraction in the prevention of perioperative anxiety in adult patients proposed for surgery under spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective randomized controlled study lasting three months from July 1, 2021. We included ASA I to III over 18 years patients, proposed for visceral or orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. We didn't include patients operated in lateral or prone positions or with a history of anxiety disorders or communication difficulties. 90 patients were randomized into two groups: a control group T and a group A who had an AVD throughout the operation. The primary outcome was anxiety as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic characteristics, Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) and pain levels were comparable between the two groups. During the surgery, 22 (48.9 %) patients in group T versus 3 (6.7 %) in group A required Midazolam (p < 0.001). Anxiety assessed by VAS at the end of the act was lower in group A (p < 0.001). The pain levels also were lower in patients who received AVD (p = 0.004). A patient satisfaction score (Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale French version) ≥ 5.4 was more frequently observed in group A (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVD reduced perioperative anxiety and decreased the use of midazolam during surgery performed under spinal anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":"102 10","pages":"664-670"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.4468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Audiovisual distraction (AVD) is one of the non-pharmacological means of anxiety prevention. However, few studies have evaluated its perioperative effect in adults.

Aim: To evaluate the contribution of audio-visual distraction in the prevention of perioperative anxiety in adult patients proposed for surgery under spinal anesthesia.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study lasting three months from July 1, 2021. We included ASA I to III over 18 years patients, proposed for visceral or orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. We didn't include patients operated in lateral or prone positions or with a history of anxiety disorders or communication difficulties. 90 patients were randomized into two groups: a control group T and a group A who had an AVD throughout the operation. The primary outcome was anxiety as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results: Demographic characteristics, Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) and pain levels were comparable between the two groups. During the surgery, 22 (48.9 %) patients in group T versus 3 (6.7 %) in group A required Midazolam (p < 0.001). Anxiety assessed by VAS at the end of the act was lower in group A (p < 0.001). The pain levels also were lower in patients who received AVD (p = 0.004). A patient satisfaction score (Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale French version) ≥ 5.4 was more frequently observed in group A (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: AVD reduced perioperative anxiety and decreased the use of midazolam during surgery performed under spinal anesthesia.

预防围手术期焦虑:视听分散的兴趣
简介视听分散法(AVD)是预防焦虑的非药物疗法之一。目的:评估视听分散法在预防拟接受脊髓麻醉手术的成年患者围术期焦虑中的作用:这是一项前瞻性随机对照研究,从 2021 年 7 月 1 日开始,为期三个月。研究对象包括 ASA I 至 III 级、年满 18 岁、拟在脊髓麻醉下进行内脏或骨科手术的患者。我们不包括侧卧位或俯卧位手术的患者,也不包括有焦虑症或交流障碍病史的患者。90名患者被随机分为两组:对照组T和A组,A组在整个手术过程中都有AVD。主要结果是通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估焦虑程度:两组的人口统计学特征、阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑和信息量表(APAIS)以及疼痛程度相当。在手术过程中,T 组有 22 名患者(48.9%)需要服用咪达唑仑,而 A 组只有 3 名患者(6.7%)(P < 0.001)。根据 VAS 评估,A 组患者在手术结束时的焦虑程度较低(P < 0.001)。接受 AVD 的患者疼痛程度也较低(p = 0.004)。A组患者的满意度评分(爱荷华麻醉满意度量表法文版)≥5.4的比例更高(p < 0.001):结论:在脊髓麻醉下进行手术时,AVD 可减少围术期焦虑,并减少咪达唑仑的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunisie Medicale
Tunisie Medicale Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信