Transforming care: Optimizing ERAS pathway in breast cancer surgery with latissimus dorsi flap.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lee-Lee Lai, Mei-Sze Teh, Zhi-Yuen Beh, Woon-Lai Lim, Siu-Min Lim, Wei-Qi Soh, Qing-Yi Tan, Lucy Chan, Mee-Hoong See
{"title":"Transforming care: Optimizing ERAS pathway in breast cancer surgery with latissimus dorsi flap.","authors":"Lee-Lee Lai, Mei-Sze Teh, Zhi-Yuen Beh, Woon-Lai Lim, Siu-Min Lim, Wei-Qi Soh, Qing-Yi Tan, Lucy Chan, Mee-Hoong See","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to establish, execute, and assess the effectiveness of a perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) clinical care pathway in breast reconstruction patients with LD flap breast cancer treatment. The goal is to improve early recovery outcomes, reduce hospitalization time, and enhance patient satisfaction by implementing a standardized approach to postoperative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Center. The outcomes of 21 breast cancer patients who underwent autologous reconstructive breast surgery with the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap within six months before the implementation of the ERAS pathway (pre-ERAS) were compared with 26 patients who underwent the same surgery with the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block for the (ERAS protocol implementation) cohort. The study was conducted from November 2019 to October 2020. The length of hospital stay, amount of analgesic usage, and incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implementation of the ERAS clinical care pathway resulted in shorter hospital stays compared with the preceding care. On average, ERAS patients were mostly discharged on Day 2 post-surgery, whereas pre-ERAS patients were mostly discharged on Day 7. ERAS patients had a lower incidence of PONV from Days 1 to 5, starting with 88.5% not experiencing the condition on Days 1 and 2 and increasing to 100% on Day 5. All pre-ERAS patients experienced PONV in the first 5 days post-surgery. Fewer ERAS patients required antiemetics post-surgery (88.5%) compared with pre-ERAS patients (42.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of the ERAS protocol as part of clinical care in autologous reconstructive breast surgery with the LD flap can improve recovery by shortening hospital stay, decreasing the use of analgesia, and alleviating PONV.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to establish, execute, and assess the effectiveness of a perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) clinical care pathway in breast reconstruction patients with LD flap breast cancer treatment. The goal is to improve early recovery outcomes, reduce hospitalization time, and enhance patient satisfaction by implementing a standardized approach to postoperative care.

Methods: This study was conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Center. The outcomes of 21 breast cancer patients who underwent autologous reconstructive breast surgery with the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap within six months before the implementation of the ERAS pathway (pre-ERAS) were compared with 26 patients who underwent the same surgery with the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block for the (ERAS protocol implementation) cohort. The study was conducted from November 2019 to October 2020. The length of hospital stay, amount of analgesic usage, and incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) were recorded.

Results: The implementation of the ERAS clinical care pathway resulted in shorter hospital stays compared with the preceding care. On average, ERAS patients were mostly discharged on Day 2 post-surgery, whereas pre-ERAS patients were mostly discharged on Day 7. ERAS patients had a lower incidence of PONV from Days 1 to 5, starting with 88.5% not experiencing the condition on Days 1 and 2 and increasing to 100% on Day 5. All pre-ERAS patients experienced PONV in the first 5 days post-surgery. Fewer ERAS patients required antiemetics post-surgery (88.5%) compared with pre-ERAS patients (42.9%).

Conclusion: The implementation of the ERAS protocol as part of clinical care in autologous reconstructive breast surgery with the LD flap can improve recovery by shortening hospital stay, decreasing the use of analgesia, and alleviating PONV.

转变护理:背阔肌皮瓣乳腺癌手术中的 ERAS 优化路径。
导言:本研究旨在为接受LD皮瓣乳腺癌治疗的乳房重建患者建立、实施和评估围手术期加强术后恢复(ERAS)临床护理路径的有效性。目的是通过实施标准化的术后护理方法,改善早期恢复效果,缩短住院时间,提高患者满意度:本研究在马来亚大学医疗中心进行。在ERAS路径实施前(pre-ERAS)的6个月内接受背阔肌(LD)皮瓣自体重建乳房手术的21名乳腺癌患者,与(ERAS方案实施)队列中接受超声引导下竖脊面(ESP)阻滞相同手术的26名患者的疗效进行了比较。研究于2019年11月至2020年10月进行。记录了住院时间、镇痛剂用量和术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率:结果:与之前的护理相比,ERAS临床护理路径的实施缩短了住院时间。平均而言,ERAS患者大多在术后第2天出院,而实施ERAS前的患者大多在第7天出院。从第1天到第5天,ERAS患者的PONV发生率较低,从第1天和第2天88.5%的患者未发生PONV,到第5天增加到100%。所有ERAS前患者都在术后头5天出现过PONV。ERAS患者术后需要止吐药的比例(88.5%)低于ERAS前患者(42.9%):结论:在使用 LD 皮瓣的自体乳房再造手术中,实施 ERAS 方案作为临床护理的一部分,可以缩短住院时间、减少镇痛药的使用并缓解 PONV,从而改善术后恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信