Min Kyu Kim, In Rae Cho, Yooeun Kim, Jin Ho Choi, Kwangrok Jung, Jaihwan Kim, Sheehyun Kim, Hongseok Yun, Jeesun Yoon, Do-Youn Oh, Kwangsoo Kim, Sang Hyub Lee
{"title":"Prognostic value of the <i>TP53</i> mutation in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving FOLFIRINOX.","authors":"Min Kyu Kim, In Rae Cho, Yooeun Kim, Jin Ho Choi, Kwangrok Jung, Jaihwan Kim, Sheehyun Kim, Hongseok Yun, Jeesun Yoon, Do-Youn Oh, Kwangsoo Kim, Sang Hyub Lee","doi":"10.1177/17588359241290482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>KRAS</i>, <i>TP53</i>, <i>CDKN2A</i>, and <i>SMAD4</i> have been the main driver mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Studies on the clinical significance and treatment response to 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) regimen in terms of the presence of these mutations remain inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the survival outcome and response to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy based on the presence of four driver mutation genes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-center retrospective study conducted at two tertiary medical centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed PDAC patients who were treated with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy as the initial treatment. Tumor specimens were analyzed by a targeted next-generation sequencing platform at two tertiary referral hospitals from January 2016 to March 2022. Patients' demographics, survival outcomes, and chemotherapeutic response were investigated and compared according to the presence of driver mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 100 patients. <i>KRAS</i> mutation was identified in 92 (92.0%) patients, followed by <i>TP53</i>, <i>CDKN2A</i>, and <i>SMAD4</i> in 63 (63.0%), 18 (18.0%), and 17 (17.0%) patients, respectively. The <i>TP53</i> wild-type group demonstrated longer overall survival (OS) than the <i>TP53</i> mutated group (median OS: 29 vs 19 months, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and <i>TP53</i> served as a prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio = 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-3.00, <i>p</i> = 0.048). The difference in OS according to <i>TP53</i> mutation was intensified in localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (37 vs 19 months, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The <i>TP53</i> wild-type group demonstrated a higher objective response rate to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy than the <i>TP53</i> mutation group in localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (50.0% vs 17.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDAC patients with wild-type <i>TP53</i> demonstrated longer OS than those with <i>TP53</i> mutation, and this trend was intensified in patients with localized disease. This result may be due to an impaired response to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17588359241290482"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241290482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 have been the main driver mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Studies on the clinical significance and treatment response to 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) regimen in terms of the presence of these mutations remain inconclusive.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the survival outcome and response to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy based on the presence of four driver mutation genes.
Design: A multi-center retrospective study conducted at two tertiary medical centers.
Methods: This study analyzed PDAC patients who were treated with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy as the initial treatment. Tumor specimens were analyzed by a targeted next-generation sequencing platform at two tertiary referral hospitals from January 2016 to March 2022. Patients' demographics, survival outcomes, and chemotherapeutic response were investigated and compared according to the presence of driver mutations.
Results: The analysis included 100 patients. KRAS mutation was identified in 92 (92.0%) patients, followed by TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 in 63 (63.0%), 18 (18.0%), and 17 (17.0%) patients, respectively. The TP53 wild-type group demonstrated longer overall survival (OS) than the TP53 mutated group (median OS: 29 vs 19 months, p = 0.03), and TP53 served as a prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio = 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-3.00, p = 0.048). The difference in OS according to TP53 mutation was intensified in localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (37 vs 19 months, p = 0.01). The TP53 wild-type group demonstrated a higher objective response rate to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy than the TP53 mutation group in localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (50.0% vs 17.6%, p = 0.024).
Conclusion: PDAC patients with wild-type TP53 demonstrated longer OS than those with TP53 mutation, and this trend was intensified in patients with localized disease. This result may be due to an impaired response to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with TP53 mutation.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).