Cervical Cancer Screening: Patient Perspectives on Transitioning to Primary High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing Alone.

Q2 Social Sciences
The Permanente journal Pub Date : 2024-12-16 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.7812/TPP/24.076
Larissa L White, Shauna R Goldberg, Alison G Escobar, Brian Hixon, Chun R Chao, Erin E Hahn, Devansu Tewari, Brian S Mittman, Heather Spencer Feigelson
{"title":"Cervical Cancer Screening: Patient Perspectives on Transitioning to Primary High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing Alone.","authors":"Larissa L White, Shauna R Goldberg, Alison G Escobar, Brian Hixon, Chun R Chao, Erin E Hahn, Devansu Tewari, Brian S Mittman, Heather Spencer Feigelson","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated cervical cancer screening recommendations to allow for screening every 5 years with primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in combination with cytology (cotesting) or every 5 years with primary HPV screening alone. Despite these changes, the uptake of primary HPV screening has been lower than expected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient perspective of an integrated health system transition from cotesting to primary HPV testing among a 30- to 65-year-old cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured phone interviews were conducted from July to December 2023 at Kaiser Permanente Colorado with 16 members aged 30-65 years. Interviews asked about reactions to the forthcoming change in cervical cancer screening, personal concern about cervical cancer risk, feedback on patient-facing education materials, and preference on communication timing and modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported concerns about cervical cancer screening intervals, primarily the reduction in frequency leading to underdiagnosis of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Participants recommended defining the rationale for the change to primary HPV testing in the patient education materials. Participants preferred communication about the change in-clinic between practitioner and patient.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The interviews identified key themes, including the differentiation between cervical cancer and STI screening methodologies, potential underdiagnosis of STI and cervical cancer, and the rationale supporting primary HPV testing and associated screening intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These qualitative findings can inform health systems of potential patient concerns to address when considering the transition from cotesting every 3 years to primary HPV testing every 5 years for cervical cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated cervical cancer screening recommendations to allow for screening every 5 years with primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in combination with cytology (cotesting) or every 5 years with primary HPV screening alone. Despite these changes, the uptake of primary HPV screening has been lower than expected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient perspective of an integrated health system transition from cotesting to primary HPV testing among a 30- to 65-year-old cohort.

Methods: Semistructured phone interviews were conducted from July to December 2023 at Kaiser Permanente Colorado with 16 members aged 30-65 years. Interviews asked about reactions to the forthcoming change in cervical cancer screening, personal concern about cervical cancer risk, feedback on patient-facing education materials, and preference on communication timing and modality.

Results: Participants reported concerns about cervical cancer screening intervals, primarily the reduction in frequency leading to underdiagnosis of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Participants recommended defining the rationale for the change to primary HPV testing in the patient education materials. Participants preferred communication about the change in-clinic between practitioner and patient.

Discussion: The interviews identified key themes, including the differentiation between cervical cancer and STI screening methodologies, potential underdiagnosis of STI and cervical cancer, and the rationale supporting primary HPV testing and associated screening intervals.

Conclusion: These qualitative findings can inform health systems of potential patient concerns to address when considering the transition from cotesting every 3 years to primary HPV testing every 5 years for cervical cancer screening.

宫颈癌筛查:宫颈癌筛查:患者对过渡到仅进行初级高风险人类乳头瘤病毒检测的看法》(Patient Perspectives on Transitioning to Primary High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing Alone)。
导言:2018年,美国预防服务工作组更新了宫颈癌筛查建议,允许每5年进行一次筛查,结合细胞学(共检)进行初级人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测,或每5年单独进行初级HPV筛查。尽管发生了这些变化,HPV 初筛的接受率仍低于预期。本研究的目的是在 30 岁至 65 岁的人群中评估患者对综合医疗系统从同种检测过渡到 HPV 初次检测的看法:方法:2023 年 7 月至 12 月,在科罗拉多州凯泽永久医院对 16 名年龄在 30-65 岁之间的患者进行了半结构化电话访谈。访谈内容包括对宫颈癌筛查即将发生变化的反应、个人对宫颈癌风险的担忧、对面向患者的教育材料的反馈以及对沟通时间和方式的偏好:结果:参与者对宫颈癌筛查间隔表示担忧,主要是筛查频率的降低会导致性传播感染(STI)诊断不足。参与者建议在患者教育材料中说明改用 HPV 初检的理由。与会者希望医生和患者在诊室内就这一改变进行沟通:讨论:访谈确定了一些关键主题,包括宫颈癌和性传播感染筛查方法之间的区别、性传播感染和宫颈癌的潜在低诊断率、支持初级 HPV 检测和相关筛查间隔的理由:这些定性研究结果可为医疗系统提供信息,使其在考虑将宫颈癌筛查从每 3 年一次的同种检测过渡到每 5 年一次的 HPV 初筛时,了解患者可能关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信