Predicting Unplanned Trauma ICU Admissions for Initial Nonoperative, Non-ICU Patients.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002490
Tyler Zander, Melissa A Kendall, Emily A Grimsley, Shamir C Harry, Johnathan V Torikashvili, Rajavi Parikh, Joseph Sujka, Paul C Kuo
{"title":"Predicting Unplanned Trauma ICU Admissions for Initial Nonoperative, Non-ICU Patients.","authors":"Tyler Zander, Melissa A Kendall, Emily A Grimsley, Shamir C Harry, Johnathan V Torikashvili, Rajavi Parikh, Joseph Sujka, Paul C Kuo","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study uses interpretable machine learning to predict unplanned ICU admissions for initial nonoperative trauma patients admitted to non-ICU locations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TQIP (2020-2021) was queried for initial nonoperative adult patients admitted to non-ICU locations. Univariable analysis compared patients who required an unplanned ICU admission to those who did not. Using variables that could be known at hospital admission, gradient boosting machines (CatBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost) were trained on 2021 data and tested on 2020 data. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort had 1,107,822 patients; 1.6% had an unplanned ICU admission. Unplanned ICU admissions were older (71 [58-80] vs. 61 [39-76] years, p < 0.01), had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (9 [8-13] vs. 9 [4-10], p < 0.01), longer length of stay (11 [7-17] vs. 4 [3-6] days, p < 0.01), higher rates of all complications and most comorbidities and injuries (p < 0.05). All models had an AUC of 0.78 and an F1 score of 0.12, indicating poor performance in predicting the minority class. Mean absolute SHAP values revealed ISS (0.46), age (0.29), and absence of comorbidities (0.16) as most influential in predictions. Dependency plots showed greater SHAP values for greater ISS, age, and presence of comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning may outperform prior attempts at predicting the risk of unplanned ICU admissions in trauma patients while identifying unique predictors. Despite this progress, further research is needed to improve predictive performance by addressing class imbalance limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study uses interpretable machine learning to predict unplanned ICU admissions for initial nonoperative trauma patients admitted to non-ICU locations.

Methods: TQIP (2020-2021) was queried for initial nonoperative adult patients admitted to non-ICU locations. Univariable analysis compared patients who required an unplanned ICU admission to those who did not. Using variables that could be known at hospital admission, gradient boosting machines (CatBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost) were trained on 2021 data and tested on 2020 data. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretation.

Results: The cohort had 1,107,822 patients; 1.6% had an unplanned ICU admission. Unplanned ICU admissions were older (71 [58-80] vs. 61 [39-76] years, p < 0.01), had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (9 [8-13] vs. 9 [4-10], p < 0.01), longer length of stay (11 [7-17] vs. 4 [3-6] days, p < 0.01), higher rates of all complications and most comorbidities and injuries (p < 0.05). All models had an AUC of 0.78 and an F1 score of 0.12, indicating poor performance in predicting the minority class. Mean absolute SHAP values revealed ISS (0.46), age (0.29), and absence of comorbidities (0.16) as most influential in predictions. Dependency plots showed greater SHAP values for greater ISS, age, and presence of comorbidities.

Conclusions: Machine learning may outperform prior attempts at predicting the risk of unplanned ICU admissions in trauma patients while identifying unique predictors. Despite this progress, further research is needed to improve predictive performance by addressing class imbalance limitations.

预测初始非手术、非重症监护室患者意外入住重症监护室的情况。
导言:计划外入住重症监护室(ICU)与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。本研究使用可解释的机器学习方法来预测非重症监护室收治的初次非手术创伤患者的计划外重症监护室入院情况:方法:查询了 TQIP(2020-2021 年),了解非重症监护室收治的初始非手术成年患者的情况。单变量分析比较了需要意外入住 ICU 的患者与不需要入住 ICU 的患者。利用入院时已知的变量,梯度提升机器(CatBoost、LightGBM、XGBoost)在 2021 年的数据上进行了训练,并在 2020 年的数据上进行了测试。结果:队列中有 1,107,822 名患者;1.6% 的患者曾在非计划情况下入住 ICU。非计划入住 ICU 的患者年龄较大(71 [58-80] 岁 vs. 61 [39-76] 岁,P < 0.01),损伤严重程度评分(ISS)较高(9 [8-13] 分 vs. 9 [4-10]分,P < 0.01),住院时间较长(11 [7-17] 天 vs. 4 [3-6] 天,P < 0.01),所有并发症和大多数合并症及损伤的发生率较高(P < 0.05)。所有模型的 AUC 均为 0.78,F1 得分为 0.12,表明在预测少数群体等级方面表现不佳。平均绝对 SHAP 值显示,ISS(0.46)、年龄(0.29)和无合并症(0.16)对预测影响最大。依存图显示,ISS、年龄和合并症越大,SHAP 值越大:机器学习在预测创伤患者意外入住重症监护室的风险方面可能优于之前的尝试,同时还能识别出独特的预测因素。尽管取得了这一进展,但仍需进一步研究,通过解决类不平衡的局限性来提高预测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信