Use of point-of-care tests in pharyngotonsillitis - a registry-based study in primary health care.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jon Pallon, Katarina Hedin
{"title":"Use of point-of-care tests in pharyngotonsillitis - a registry-based study in primary health care.","authors":"Jon Pallon, Katarina Hedin","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2416671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care (POC) tests, including C-reactive protein (CRP) tests and rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for group A streptococci (GAS), are widely used in Swedish primary health care (PHC). This study quantifies their use in pharyngotonsillitis and explore their association with antibiotic prescribing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective data from 2012-2016 in Region Kronoberg, Sweden, included all PHC visits with a pharyngotonsillitis diagnosis. Patient characteristics, test usage and antibiotic prescriptions were linked by visit date and personal identification number. Descriptive statistics were used for POC test analysis. Logistic regression assessed the association between CRP levels and antibiotic prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 24,237 visits, 68% included RADT and 36% included a CRP test, with 89% of CRP tests performed alongside RADT. CRP testing was more frequent in patients with negative (56%) than positive RADTs (42%) (<i>p</i> < .001). Overall, 66% of RADTs were positive. Median CRP levels were 23 mg/l for positive RADT and 31 mg/l for negative RADT (<i>p</i> < .001). Antibiotics were prescribed for 95% of positive RADTs and 43% of negative RADTs (<i>p</i> < .001). In patients with negative RADTs, CRP testing was associated with higher antibiotic prescribing (57%) compared to no CRP testing (26%) (<i>p</i> < .001). Among these patients, CRP levels were associated with prescribing (aOR 1.032; 95% CI 1.029-1.035; <i>p</i> < .001), with 50% of prescriptions occuring at CRP levels ≤ 20 mg/l.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of RADTs and the proportion of positive test were higher than expected, indicating inappropriate use and diagnostic bias. CRP testing, contrary to guidelines, was common and associated with increased antibiotic prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"164-172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2416671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care (POC) tests, including C-reactive protein (CRP) tests and rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for group A streptococci (GAS), are widely used in Swedish primary health care (PHC). This study quantifies their use in pharyngotonsillitis and explore their association with antibiotic prescribing.

Material and methods: Retrospective data from 2012-2016 in Region Kronoberg, Sweden, included all PHC visits with a pharyngotonsillitis diagnosis. Patient characteristics, test usage and antibiotic prescriptions were linked by visit date and personal identification number. Descriptive statistics were used for POC test analysis. Logistic regression assessed the association between CRP levels and antibiotic prescribing.

Results: Of 24,237 visits, 68% included RADT and 36% included a CRP test, with 89% of CRP tests performed alongside RADT. CRP testing was more frequent in patients with negative (56%) than positive RADTs (42%) (p < .001). Overall, 66% of RADTs were positive. Median CRP levels were 23 mg/l for positive RADT and 31 mg/l for negative RADT (p < .001). Antibiotics were prescribed for 95% of positive RADTs and 43% of negative RADTs (p < .001). In patients with negative RADTs, CRP testing was associated with higher antibiotic prescribing (57%) compared to no CRP testing (26%) (p < .001). Among these patients, CRP levels were associated with prescribing (aOR 1.032; 95% CI 1.029-1.035; p < .001), with 50% of prescriptions occuring at CRP levels ≤ 20 mg/l.

Conclusion: The use of RADTs and the proportion of positive test were higher than expected, indicating inappropriate use and diagnostic bias. CRP testing, contrary to guidelines, was common and associated with increased antibiotic prescribing.

咽扁桃体炎护理点检测的使用--一项基于登记的初级卫生保健研究。
背景:瑞典初级卫生保健机构(PHC)广泛使用床旁检测(POC),包括 C 反应蛋白(CRP)检测和 A 组链球菌(GAS)快速抗原检测(RADT)。本研究量化了它们在咽扁桃体炎中的使用情况,并探讨了它们与抗生素处方的关联:瑞典克鲁努贝里大区 2012-2016 年的回顾性数据包括所有诊断为咽扁桃体炎的初级卫生保健就诊者。通过就诊日期和个人识别码将患者特征、检验使用情况和抗生素处方联系起来。描述性统计用于 POC 检验分析。逻辑回归评估了 CRP 水平与抗生素处方之间的关联:在 24,237 次就诊中,68% 的患者接受了 RADT 检测,36% 的患者接受了 CRP 检测,其中 89% 的 CRP 检测与 RADT 同时进行。RADT阴性患者(56%)比RADT阳性患者(42%)更经常进行CRP检测(P P P P P 结论:RADT和CRP检测的使用情况与医生的处方有关:RADT 的使用率和检测结果呈阳性的比例均高于预期,这表明存在使用不当和诊断偏差。与指南相反,CRP 检测很常见,并与抗生素处方的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信