Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Dimas Cavalheiro Prazeres, Silvia Gaspar, Felipe Granado de Souza, Luciana D Chiavegato, Camila Ferreira Leite, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Carlos Rr Carvalho, Marcia S Volpe
{"title":"Long-Term Disabilities in ICU Survivors of COVID-19.","authors":"Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Dimas Cavalheiro Prazeres, Silvia Gaspar, Felipe Granado de Souza, Luciana D Chiavegato, Camila Ferreira Leite, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Carlos Rr Carvalho, Marcia S Volpe","doi":"10.4187/respcare.12032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 is associated with prolonged disability, particularly after critical illness. This study aimed to assess and compare disability post-hospital discharge of subjects who were invasively ventilated versus those who were not, following ICU admission due to COVID-19. This study also explored variables associated with long-term disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, subjects with COVID-19 who received invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula during ICU stay were assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 at 3 and 6 months post-hospital discharge. Data were analyzed collectively and stratified as subjects with and without invasive mechanical ventilation. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analyses were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subjects (<i>N</i> = 43) were mainly male, middle age, and overweight. Subjects who were invasively ventilated (<i>n</i> = 21) had decreased physical function compared to those who were not during hospital assessments. From 3-6 months after discharge, all WHODAS domains and the overall score decreased in both groups (<i>P</i> < .001), indicating disability recovery. The participation domain, which assesses joining in society, was the only domain that remained worse in the ventilation group compared to the no ventilation group (<i>P</i> = .01). No interaction was found between time and the study groups, suggesting that the recovery trajectory was similar. At 6 months, considering the entire cohort, 70% and 56% had no disability in self-care and getting along domains, respectively, while 42% exhibited moderate to severe disability in the participation domain. According to the overall WHODAS score, 86% of subjects still had some level of disability at 6 months. In multivariate analyses, the overall WHODAS score along with the household and participation domains showed significant positive correlations, indicating higher disability, with corticosteroid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability persisted at 6 month post-hospital discharge for ICU survivors of COVID-19, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Participation was the only domain that showed higher disability among those who received invasive ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1508-1516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 is associated with prolonged disability, particularly after critical illness. This study aimed to assess and compare disability post-hospital discharge of subjects who were invasively ventilated versus those who were not, following ICU admission due to COVID-19. This study also explored variables associated with long-term disability.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, subjects with COVID-19 who received invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula during ICU stay were assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 at 3 and 6 months post-hospital discharge. Data were analyzed collectively and stratified as subjects with and without invasive mechanical ventilation. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analyses were applied.
Results: The subjects (N = 43) were mainly male, middle age, and overweight. Subjects who were invasively ventilated (n = 21) had decreased physical function compared to those who were not during hospital assessments. From 3-6 months after discharge, all WHODAS domains and the overall score decreased in both groups (P < .001), indicating disability recovery. The participation domain, which assesses joining in society, was the only domain that remained worse in the ventilation group compared to the no ventilation group (P = .01). No interaction was found between time and the study groups, suggesting that the recovery trajectory was similar. At 6 months, considering the entire cohort, 70% and 56% had no disability in self-care and getting along domains, respectively, while 42% exhibited moderate to severe disability in the participation domain. According to the overall WHODAS score, 86% of subjects still had some level of disability at 6 months. In multivariate analyses, the overall WHODAS score along with the household and participation domains showed significant positive correlations, indicating higher disability, with corticosteroid use.
Conclusions: Disability persisted at 6 month post-hospital discharge for ICU survivors of COVID-19, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Participation was the only domain that showed higher disability among those who received invasive ventilation.
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.