Mamta Naik, Emily Warden, Rick Pittman, Lakshmi Katakam
{"title":"Gentamicin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy.","authors":"Mamta Naik, Emily Warden, Rick Pittman, Lakshmi Katakam","doi":"10.1007/s40272-024-00661-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to review the pharmacokinetic profile of gentamicin among neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of neonates with HIE undergoing TH in the neonatal intensive care unit who received gentamicin between 2009 and 2014. Demographic information, diagnoses, laboratory test results, and medication administration and monitoring information were collected, and data were analyzed using SciPy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 neonates were analyzed. The median birth weight was 3.25 kg (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8-3.68), and median gestational age was 39 weeks (IQR 38-40). An elevated gentamicin trough level (defined as > 2 mg/L) was observed in 61% (35/57) of neonates. Half of the neonates (49%) had multiple gentamicin trough levels obtained, and 4% of the neonates were switched to an alternate agent. There was a significant difference in the number of dosing interval changes in neonates with elevated gentamicin trough levels compared with those with therapeutic gentamicin trough levels (P < 0.001). Of the neonates with elevated gentamicin trough levels, 14% (5/35) failed their hearing screen (P = 0.389).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neonates with HIE undergoing TH may have an altered pharmacokinetic profile, requiring multiple blood draws so medication levels can be monitored and doses adjusted. Traditional gentamicin dosing regimens may not be ideal for this patient population, and further guidance is required for alternative treatment regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":19955,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-024-00661-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review the pharmacokinetic profile of gentamicin among neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH) treatment.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of neonates with HIE undergoing TH in the neonatal intensive care unit who received gentamicin between 2009 and 2014. Demographic information, diagnoses, laboratory test results, and medication administration and monitoring information were collected, and data were analyzed using SciPy.
Results: A total of 57 neonates were analyzed. The median birth weight was 3.25 kg (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8-3.68), and median gestational age was 39 weeks (IQR 38-40). An elevated gentamicin trough level (defined as > 2 mg/L) was observed in 61% (35/57) of neonates. Half of the neonates (49%) had multiple gentamicin trough levels obtained, and 4% of the neonates were switched to an alternate agent. There was a significant difference in the number of dosing interval changes in neonates with elevated gentamicin trough levels compared with those with therapeutic gentamicin trough levels (P < 0.001). Of the neonates with elevated gentamicin trough levels, 14% (5/35) failed their hearing screen (P = 0.389).
Conclusions: Neonates with HIE undergoing TH may have an altered pharmacokinetic profile, requiring multiple blood draws so medication levels can be monitored and doses adjusted. Traditional gentamicin dosing regimens may not be ideal for this patient population, and further guidance is required for alternative treatment regimens.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Drugs promotes the optimization and advancement of all aspects of pharmacotherapy for healthcare professionals interested in pediatric drug therapy (including vaccines). The program of review and original research articles provides healthcare decision makers with clinically applicable knowledge on issues relevant to drug therapy in all areas of neonatology and the care of children and adolescents. The Journal includes:
-overviews of contentious or emerging issues.
-comprehensive narrative reviews of topics relating to the effective and safe management of drug therapy through all stages of pediatric development.
-practical reviews covering optimum drug management of specific clinical situations.
-systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement.
-Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in the pediatric population.
-original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies.
Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pediatric Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.