Multiple points of system failure underpin continuous subcutaneous infusion safety incidents in palliative care: A mixed methods analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amy Brown, Sarah Yardley, Ben Bowers, Sally-Anne Francis, Lucy Bemand-Qureshi, Stuart Hellard, Antony Chuter, Andrew Carson-Stevens
{"title":"Multiple points of system failure underpin continuous subcutaneous infusion safety incidents in palliative care: A mixed methods analysis.","authors":"Amy Brown, Sarah Yardley, Ben Bowers, Sally-Anne Francis, Lucy Bemand-Qureshi, Stuart Hellard, Antony Chuter, Andrew Carson-Stevens","doi":"10.1177/02692163241287639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About 25% of palliative medication incidents involve continuous subcutaneous infusions. Complex structural and human factor issues make these risk-prone interventions. Detailed analysis of how this safety-critical care can be improved has not been undertaken. Understanding context, contributory factors and events leading to incidents is essential.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>(1) Understand continuous subcutaneous infusion safety incidents and their impact on patients and families; (2) Identify targets for system improvements by learning from recurrent events and contributory factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Following systematic identification and stratification by degree of harm, a mixed methods analysis of palliative medication incidents involving continuous subcutaneous infusions comprising quantitative descriptive analysis using the <b>P</b>at<b>I</b>ent <b>SA</b>fety (PISA) classification system and qualitative narrative analysis of free-text reports.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Palliative medication incidents (<i>n</i> = 7506) reported to the National Reporting and Learning System, England and Wales (2016-2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 1317/7506 incidents involved continuous subcutaneous infusions with 943 (72%) detailing harms. Primary incidents (most proximal to patient outcomes) leading to inappropriate medication use (including not using medication when it was needed) were underpinned by breakdowns in three major medication processes: monitoring and supply (405, 31%), administration (383, 29%) and prescribing (268, 20%). Recurring contributory factors included discontinuity of care within and between settings, inadequate time, inadequate staffing and unfamiliarity with protocols. Psychological harms for patients and families were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>System infrastructure is needed to enable timely supply of medication and equipment, effective coordinated use of continuous subcutaneous infusions, communication and continuity of care. Training is needed to improve incident descriptions so these pinpoint precise targets for safer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2692163241287639"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241287639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: About 25% of palliative medication incidents involve continuous subcutaneous infusions. Complex structural and human factor issues make these risk-prone interventions. Detailed analysis of how this safety-critical care can be improved has not been undertaken. Understanding context, contributory factors and events leading to incidents is essential.

Aims: (1) Understand continuous subcutaneous infusion safety incidents and their impact on patients and families; (2) Identify targets for system improvements by learning from recurrent events and contributory factors.

Design: Following systematic identification and stratification by degree of harm, a mixed methods analysis of palliative medication incidents involving continuous subcutaneous infusions comprising quantitative descriptive analysis using the PatIent SAfety (PISA) classification system and qualitative narrative analysis of free-text reports.

Setting/participants: Palliative medication incidents (n = 7506) reported to the National Reporting and Learning System, England and Wales (2016-2021).

Results: About 1317/7506 incidents involved continuous subcutaneous infusions with 943 (72%) detailing harms. Primary incidents (most proximal to patient outcomes) leading to inappropriate medication use (including not using medication when it was needed) were underpinned by breakdowns in three major medication processes: monitoring and supply (405, 31%), administration (383, 29%) and prescribing (268, 20%). Recurring contributory factors included discontinuity of care within and between settings, inadequate time, inadequate staffing and unfamiliarity with protocols. Psychological harms for patients and families were identified.

Conclusions: System infrastructure is needed to enable timely supply of medication and equipment, effective coordinated use of continuous subcutaneous infusions, communication and continuity of care. Training is needed to improve incident descriptions so these pinpoint precise targets for safer care.

姑息治疗中持续皮下注射安全事故的多点系统故障:混合方法分析。
背景:约 25% 的姑息用药事故涉及持续皮下注射。复杂的结构和人为因素问题使这些干预措施很容易发生风险。目前尚未对如何改善这种对安全至关重要的护理进行详细分析。目的:(1)了解持续皮下输液安全事件及其对患者和家属的影响;(2)通过从反复发生的事件和促成因素中学习,确定系统改进的目标:设计:根据伤害程度进行系统识别和分层后,对涉及持续皮下输液的姑息用药事件进行混合方法分析,包括使用患者安全(PISA)分类系统进行定量描述性分析和对自由文本报告进行定性叙述性分析:向英格兰和威尔士国家报告和学习系统报告的姑息用药事件(n = 7506)(2016-2021 年):约 1317/7506 起事件涉及持续皮下注射,其中 943 起(72%)详细描述了伤害。导致用药不当(包括需要用药时不用药)的主要事件(最接近患者结果)是由三个主要用药流程的故障造成的:监测和供应(405 例,31%)、管理(383 例,29%)和处方(268 例,20%)。反复出现的促成因素包括:医疗机构内部和医疗机构之间的不连续性、时间不足、人员配备不足以及不熟悉规程。研究还发现了对患者和家属造成的心理伤害:需要建立系统基础设施,以便及时供应药物和设备、有效协调使用持续皮下注射、沟通和持续护理。需要开展培训以改进事故描述,从而准确定位目标,提供更安全的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信