Temporal trends in concordance between ICD-coded and cardiac biomarker-classified hospitalisation rates for acute coronary syndromes: a linked hospital and biomarker data study.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Dawit Zemedikun, Joseph Hung, Derrick Lopez, Matthew Knuiman, David Youens, Tom G Briffa, Frank Sanfilippo, Lee Nedkoff
{"title":"Temporal trends in concordance between ICD-coded and cardiac biomarker-classified hospitalisation rates for acute coronary syndromes: a linked hospital and biomarker data study.","authors":"Dawit Zemedikun, Joseph Hung, Derrick Lopez, Matthew Knuiman, David Youens, Tom G Briffa, Frank Sanfilippo, Lee Nedkoff","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 2000, the definition of myocardial infarction (MI) has evolved with reliance on cardiac troponin (cTn) tests. The implications of this change on trends of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes obtained from routinely collected hospital morbidity data are unclear. Using person-linked hospitalisation data, we compared International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded data with biomarker-classified admission rates for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) in Western Australia (WA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used linked hospitalisation data from all WA tertiary hospitals to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of STEMI, NSTEMI or UA between 2002 and 2016. Linked biomarker results were classified as 'diagnostic' for MI according to established criteria. We calculated age-standardised and sex-standardised rates (ASSRs) for ICD-coded versus biomarker-classified admissions by ACS subtypes and estimated annual change in admissions using Poisson regression adjusting for age and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 37 272 ACS admissions in 30 683 patients (64.2% male), and 96% of cases had linked biomarker data, predominantly conventional cTn at the start and high-sensitive cTn from late 2013. Despite lower ASSRs, trends in MI classified with a diagnostic biomarker were concordant with ICD-coded admissions rates for both STEMI and NSTEMI. Between 2002 and 2010, STEMI rates declined by 4.1% (95% CI 5.0%, 3.1%) and 3.4% (95% CI 4.6%, 2.3%) in ICD-coded and biomarker-classified admissions, respectively, and both plateaued thereafter. For NSTEMI between 2002 and 2010, the ICD-coded and biomarker-classified rates increased 8.0% per year (95% CI 7.2%, 8.9%) and 8.0% (95% CI 7.0%, 9.0%), respectively, and both subsequently declined. For UA, both ICD-coded and biomarker-classified UA admission rates declined in a steady and concordant manner between 2002 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study supports the validity of using administrative data to monitor population trends in ACS subtypes as they appear to generally reflect the redefinition of MI in the troponin era.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since 2000, the definition of myocardial infarction (MI) has evolved with reliance on cardiac troponin (cTn) tests. The implications of this change on trends of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes obtained from routinely collected hospital morbidity data are unclear. Using person-linked hospitalisation data, we compared International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded data with biomarker-classified admission rates for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) in Western Australia (WA).

Methods: We used linked hospitalisation data from all WA tertiary hospitals to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of STEMI, NSTEMI or UA between 2002 and 2016. Linked biomarker results were classified as 'diagnostic' for MI according to established criteria. We calculated age-standardised and sex-standardised rates (ASSRs) for ICD-coded versus biomarker-classified admissions by ACS subtypes and estimated annual change in admissions using Poisson regression adjusting for age and sex.

Results: There were 37 272 ACS admissions in 30 683 patients (64.2% male), and 96% of cases had linked biomarker data, predominantly conventional cTn at the start and high-sensitive cTn from late 2013. Despite lower ASSRs, trends in MI classified with a diagnostic biomarker were concordant with ICD-coded admissions rates for both STEMI and NSTEMI. Between 2002 and 2010, STEMI rates declined by 4.1% (95% CI 5.0%, 3.1%) and 3.4% (95% CI 4.6%, 2.3%) in ICD-coded and biomarker-classified admissions, respectively, and both plateaued thereafter. For NSTEMI between 2002 and 2010, the ICD-coded and biomarker-classified rates increased 8.0% per year (95% CI 7.2%, 8.9%) and 8.0% (95% CI 7.0%, 9.0%), respectively, and both subsequently declined. For UA, both ICD-coded and biomarker-classified UA admission rates declined in a steady and concordant manner between 2002 and 2016.

Conclusions: The present study supports the validity of using administrative data to monitor population trends in ACS subtypes as they appear to generally reflect the redefinition of MI in the troponin era.

急性冠状动脉综合征的 ICD 编码住院率与心脏生物标记物分类住院率之间的一致性时间趋势:一项关联医院和生物标记物数据研究。
背景:自 2000 年以来,心肌梗死(MI)的定义随着心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)检测的使用而发生了变化。这一变化对从常规收集的医院发病率数据中获得的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)亚型趋势的影响尚不清楚。我们使用与个人相关的住院数据,比较了西澳大利亚州(WA)国际疾病分类(ICD)编码数据与生物标记物分类的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、非STEMI(NSTEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛(UA)入院率:我们使用了西澳大利亚州所有三级医院的关联住院数据,以确定2002年至2016年间主要诊断为STEMI、NSTEMI或UA的患者。根据既定标准,关联生物标记物结果被归类为心肌梗死的 "诊断性 "结果。我们按 ACS 亚型计算了 ICD 编码与生物标志物分类入院患者的年龄标准化率和性别标准化率 (ASSR),并使用调整年龄和性别的泊松回归估算了入院患者的年度变化:30 683 名患者(64.2% 为男性)中有 37 272 例 ACS 住院病例,96% 的病例有相关生物标记物数据,主要是开始时的常规 cTn 和 2013 年底开始的高敏 cTn。尽管ASSR较低,但使用诊断生物标志物分类的心肌梗死趋势与ICD编码的STEMI和NSTEMI入院率一致。2002 年至 2010 年间,在 ICD 编码和生物标志物分类的入院病例中,STEMI 发病率分别下降了 4.1%(95% CI 5.0%,3.1%)和 3.4%(95% CI 4.6%,2.3%),此后均趋于平稳。对于 2002 年至 2010 年期间的 NSTEMI,ICD 编码和生物标志物分类的发病率每年分别增加 8.0% (95% CI 7.2%, 8.9%) 和 8.0% (95% CI 7.0%, 9.0%),随后均有所下降。就尿毒症而言,2002年至2016年间,ICD编码的尿毒症入院率和生物标志物分类的尿毒症入院率均以稳定、一致的方式下降:本研究支持使用行政数据监测 ACS 亚型的人群趋势的有效性,因为这些数据似乎普遍反映了肌钙蛋白时代对 MI 的重新定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信