Medicare-subsidised mental health service use during the first 15 years of life in New South Wales: a population cohort study

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Oliver J Watkeys, Kimberlie Dean, Kristin R Laurens, Vaughan J Carr, Melissa J Green
{"title":"Medicare-subsidised mental health service use during the first 15 years of life in New South Wales: a population cohort study","authors":"Oliver J Watkeys,&nbsp;Kimberlie Dean,&nbsp;Kristin R Laurens,&nbsp;Vaughan J Carr,&nbsp;Melissa J Green","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Each year, one in seven Australian children and adolescents experience a mental disorder, but only half receive treatment.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reported that 6% of children aged 5–11 years and 13% of those aged 12–17 years used Medicare-subsidised mental health services during 2021–22.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>We investigated the annual and cumulative incidence of Medicare-subsidised mental health services for children during their first 15 years of life, and the demographic characteristics associated with the types of services used. We analysed Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) data for 86 759 children born during 1 January 2002 – 31 December 2005 and included in the New South Wales Child Development Study,<span><sup>3</sup></span> or 94.7% of the record linkage cohort; 4848 children were excluded because information for socio-demographic indices were not recorded in the 2009 NSW Australian Early Development Census.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Record linkage was performed by the NSW Centre for Health Record Linkage (CHeReL) and the AIHW Data Integration Services Centre.</p><p>MBS records for mental health services (1 January 2002 – 31 December 2018) were categorised as being delivered by general practitioners (Better Access treatment plans), psychologists, psychiatrists, occupational therapists or social workers, or other (group therapy, psychological services provided by general practitioners or paediatricians) (Supporting Information, table 1). We assessed associations between demographic factors — sex, Indigenous status, socio-economic position (Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage),<span><sup>5</sup></span> geographic remoteness (Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia)<span><sup>6</sup></span> — and each MBS-subsidised mental health service type in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses; we report odds ratios with 99.924% confidence intervals (Bonferroni-adjusted for multiple testing). The NSW Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee and ACT Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/ciphs/49) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Ethics Committee (EO2020/4/1026) approved the study. We report the study in accordance with the STROBE reporting guidelines for observational studies.<span><sup>7</sup></span></p><p>A total of 23 330 of 86 759 children (26.9%) had used MBS-subsidised mental health services prior to their 15th birthdays: 21 535 had received Better Access plans (24.8%), 15 693 had received care from psychologists (18.1%), 2306 had consulted psychiatrists (2.7%), 1844 had received psychological therapy from occupational therapists or social workers (2.1%), and 2391 had received other mental health service types (2.8%) (Box 1). The annual and cumulative incidence of mental health service use each increased exponentially with age for Better Access plans and psychologist care, and more gradually for care from other mental health service providers (Box 2). Boys were more likely than girls to receive mental health services from occupational therapists or social workers or from other sources, and less likely to receive Better Access plans. Indigenous children and children living in postcodes of lower socio-economic disadvantage were more likely to use any mental health service, including Better Access plans, psychologist care, and psychiatrist care. Children in inner regional areas were more likely than those in major cities to receive any mental health treatment, including Better Access plans, psychologist care, and services from occupational therapists or social workers; children in outer regional, remote, or very remote areas were less likely than children in major cities to use mental health services (any, Better Access plans, psychologist care). The likelihood of mental health service use by data follow-up (31 December 2018) increased with age (Box 3).</p><p>We found that 26.9% of children had used Medicare-subsidised mental health services before their 15th birthdays, a proportion considerably larger than the annual incidence at age 14 years (10.5%) or that reported in an earlier AIHW publication.<span><sup>2</sup></span> The likelihood of mental health service use was lower among non-Indigenous than Indigenous children and among children in socio-economically disadvantaged or outer regional or remote areas, consistent with other reports.<span><sup>8, 9</sup></span> Girls were more likely than boys to receive Better Access plans, but boys were more likely to receive care from occupational therapists or social workers and use “other” mental health service types, possibly because of earlier detection of externalising disorders, which are more prevalent among boys.<span><sup>10</sup></span> Service use was greater for children older at the time of follow-up, probably because of the higher incidence of mental disorders during adolescence than earlier in life.<span><sup>2, 10</sup></span> The primary limitations of our study were the unavailability of data for mental health care not covered by MBS data (eg, Headspace, privately funded, hospital and emergency, and school-based care) and the fact that we could not adjust our analyses for repeat presentations by individual children. Additional work is needed to ensure equitable access to mental health services for all young people in Australia.</p><p>The data used in this study have been provided by government custodians for research purposes of the NSW Child Development Study and cannot be shared with third parties or deposited in data repositories. Researchers wishing to access these data need to apply in writing to the relevant data custodians.</p><p>No relevant disclosures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 10","pages":"554-557"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52498","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Each year, one in seven Australian children and adolescents experience a mental disorder, but only half receive treatment.1 The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reported that 6% of children aged 5–11 years and 13% of those aged 12–17 years used Medicare-subsidised mental health services during 2021–22.2

We investigated the annual and cumulative incidence of Medicare-subsidised mental health services for children during their first 15 years of life, and the demographic characteristics associated with the types of services used. We analysed Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) data for 86 759 children born during 1 January 2002 – 31 December 2005 and included in the New South Wales Child Development Study,3 or 94.7% of the record linkage cohort; 4848 children were excluded because information for socio-demographic indices were not recorded in the 2009 NSW Australian Early Development Census.4 Record linkage was performed by the NSW Centre for Health Record Linkage (CHeReL) and the AIHW Data Integration Services Centre.

MBS records for mental health services (1 January 2002 – 31 December 2018) were categorised as being delivered by general practitioners (Better Access treatment plans), psychologists, psychiatrists, occupational therapists or social workers, or other (group therapy, psychological services provided by general practitioners or paediatricians) (Supporting Information, table 1). We assessed associations between demographic factors — sex, Indigenous status, socio-economic position (Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage),5 geographic remoteness (Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia)6 — and each MBS-subsidised mental health service type in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses; we report odds ratios with 99.924% confidence intervals (Bonferroni-adjusted for multiple testing). The NSW Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee and ACT Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/ciphs/49) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Ethics Committee (EO2020/4/1026) approved the study. We report the study in accordance with the STROBE reporting guidelines for observational studies.7

A total of 23 330 of 86 759 children (26.9%) had used MBS-subsidised mental health services prior to their 15th birthdays: 21 535 had received Better Access plans (24.8%), 15 693 had received care from psychologists (18.1%), 2306 had consulted psychiatrists (2.7%), 1844 had received psychological therapy from occupational therapists or social workers (2.1%), and 2391 had received other mental health service types (2.8%) (Box 1). The annual and cumulative incidence of mental health service use each increased exponentially with age for Better Access plans and psychologist care, and more gradually for care from other mental health service providers (Box 2). Boys were more likely than girls to receive mental health services from occupational therapists or social workers or from other sources, and less likely to receive Better Access plans. Indigenous children and children living in postcodes of lower socio-economic disadvantage were more likely to use any mental health service, including Better Access plans, psychologist care, and psychiatrist care. Children in inner regional areas were more likely than those in major cities to receive any mental health treatment, including Better Access plans, psychologist care, and services from occupational therapists or social workers; children in outer regional, remote, or very remote areas were less likely than children in major cities to use mental health services (any, Better Access plans, psychologist care). The likelihood of mental health service use by data follow-up (31 December 2018) increased with age (Box 3).

We found that 26.9% of children had used Medicare-subsidised mental health services before their 15th birthdays, a proportion considerably larger than the annual incidence at age 14 years (10.5%) or that reported in an earlier AIHW publication.2 The likelihood of mental health service use was lower among non-Indigenous than Indigenous children and among children in socio-economically disadvantaged or outer regional or remote areas, consistent with other reports.8, 9 Girls were more likely than boys to receive Better Access plans, but boys were more likely to receive care from occupational therapists or social workers and use “other” mental health service types, possibly because of earlier detection of externalising disorders, which are more prevalent among boys.10 Service use was greater for children older at the time of follow-up, probably because of the higher incidence of mental disorders during adolescence than earlier in life.2, 10 The primary limitations of our study were the unavailability of data for mental health care not covered by MBS data (eg, Headspace, privately funded, hospital and emergency, and school-based care) and the fact that we could not adjust our analyses for repeat presentations by individual children. Additional work is needed to ensure equitable access to mental health services for all young people in Australia.

The data used in this study have been provided by government custodians for research purposes of the NSW Child Development Study and cannot be shared with third parties or deposited in data repositories. Researchers wishing to access these data need to apply in writing to the relevant data custodians.

No relevant disclosures.

Abstract Image

新南威尔士人出生后 15 年内使用医疗保险补贴精神健康服务的情况:人口队列研究。
每年,每七名澳大利亚儿童和青少年中就有一人患有精神障碍,但只有一半的人接受了治疗。1 澳大利亚卫生福利研究所(AIHW)报告称,2021-22 年间,6% 的 5-11 岁儿童和 13% 的 12-17 岁儿童使用了医疗保险补贴的精神健康服务。2 我们调查了儿童出生后 15 年内医疗保险补贴精神健康服务的年度和累积发生率,以及与所使用服务类型相关的人口特征。我们分析了 2002 年 1 月 1 日至 2005 年 12 月 31 日期间出生并被纳入新南威尔士儿童发展研究(New South Wales Child Development Study)3 的 86 759 名儿童(占记录链接队列的 94.7%)的医疗保险福利表(Medicare Benefits Schedule,MBS)数据;由于 2009 年新南威尔士州澳大利亚早期发展普查(2009 NSW Australian Early Development Census)中未记录社会人口指数信息,因此剔除了 4848 名儿童。记录链接由新南威尔士州健康记录链接中心(CHeReL)和澳大利亚卫生福利部数据整合服务中心(AIHW Data Integration Services Centre)完成。心理健康服务的MBS记录(2002年1月1日至2018年12月31日)被分为由全科医生(Better Access治疗计划)、心理学家、精神科医生、职业治疗师或社会工作者提供的服务,或其他(由全科医生或儿科医生提供的团体治疗、心理服务)(辅助信息,表1)。在单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析中,我们评估了人口统计学因素--性别、土著身份、社会经济地位(相对社会经济劣势指数)5、地理偏远程度(澳大利亚可及性/偏远程度指数)6--与每种由 MBS 补贴的心理健康服务类型之间的关联;我们报告了几率比及 99.924% 的置信区间(Bonferroni-adjusted for multiple testing)。新南威尔士州人口与健康服务研究伦理委员会和澳大利亚首都地区健康人类研究伦理委员会(HREC/18/ciphs/49)以及澳大利亚健康与福利研究所伦理委员会(EO2020/4/1026)批准了这项研究。我们根据 STROBE 观察性研究报告指南7 报告了本研究。在 86 759 名儿童中,共有 23 330 名儿童(26.9%)在 15 岁生日之前使用过由心理健康BS 资助的心理健康服务:21 535 名儿童接受过 "更好获取计划"(24.8%),15 693 名儿童接受过心理学家的治疗(18.1%),2 306 名儿童咨询过精神科医生(2.7%),1 844 名儿童接受过职业治疗师或社会工作者的心理治疗(2.1%),2 391 名儿童接受过其他类型的心理健康服务(2.8%)(方框 1)。在 "更好机会 "计划和心理医生护理方面,心理健康服务的年使用率和累计使用率都随着年龄的增长而呈指数增长,而在其他心理健康服务提供者的护理方面,年使用率和累计使用率的增长则较为缓慢(方框 2)。男孩比女孩更有可能接受职业治疗师、社会工作者或其他来源的心理健康服务,而接受 "优 先就诊计划 "的可能性较低。原住民儿童和生活在社会经济条件较差地 区的儿童更有可能使用任何心理健康服务,包括 "更好获取计划"、心理学家护理和精神科医 师护理。与大城市的儿童相比,内城区的儿童更有可能接受任何心理健康治疗,包括 "更好机会 "计划、心理医生护理以及职业治疗师或社会工作者提供的服务;与大城市的儿童相比,外城区、偏远或非常偏远地区的儿童使用心理健康服务(任何服务、"更好机会 "计划、心理医生护理)的可能性较低。我们发现,有 26.9% 的儿童在 15 岁生日前使用过医疗保险补贴的心理健康服务,这一比例大大高于 14 岁时的年发生率(10.5%)或阿富汗独立卫生与福利研究院早期出版物中的报告2。非土著儿童使用心理健康服务的可能性低于土著儿童,社会经济条件较差或外围地区或偏远地区的儿童也是如此,这与其他报告一致、9 女童比男童更有可能接受 "更好机会 "计划,但男童更有可能接受职业治疗师或社会工作者的治疗,也更有可能使用 "其他 "心理健康服务类型,这可能是因为外向性障碍更早被发现,而外向性障碍在男童中更为普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信