{"title":"Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).","authors":"Pengfei Wang, Liaisan Uzianbaeva, Noemi Hughes, Alireza Mehdizadeh","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>When the uterus is or more than 18 to 20 weeks in size, laparotomy but not minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is commonly performed for hysterectomy. It is, however, acknowledged that MIS carries numerous benefits to patients compared to laparotomy. The uterine size should therefore not be an excluding factor for MIS. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of MIS for hysterectomy for large uterus and explain specific techniques employed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 73 laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy cases were collected. Cases were divided in two groups based on uterine weight (≥500 g vs <500 g). Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of hospital stays, and perioperative complications were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average specimen weight in two groups was 244 ± 102.75 g vs 903 ± 438.18 g (<i>P</i> < .01). There was no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups. Only 3 patients were hospitalized for more than one day. There were no instances of conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion. There was a statistically significant difference in the EBL (78.19 ± 43.8 ml vs 127.88 ± 69.76 ml, <i>P</i> < .01) and operative time (180.68 ± 48.36 vs 228.85 ± 53.04 minutes, <i>P</i> < .01) between the two groups. There were two cases of bladder laceration in the group with uterine weight exceeding 500 g.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With advanced surgical skills and the adoption of specific techniques, hysterectomy for large uterus can be performed safely and efficiently by MIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: When the uterus is or more than 18 to 20 weeks in size, laparotomy but not minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is commonly performed for hysterectomy. It is, however, acknowledged that MIS carries numerous benefits to patients compared to laparotomy. The uterine size should therefore not be an excluding factor for MIS. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of MIS for hysterectomy for large uterus and explain specific techniques employed.
Methods: Data from 73 laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy cases were collected. Cases were divided in two groups based on uterine weight (≥500 g vs <500 g). Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of hospital stays, and perioperative complications were compared between the groups.
Results: The average specimen weight in two groups was 244 ± 102.75 g vs 903 ± 438.18 g (P < .01). There was no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups. Only 3 patients were hospitalized for more than one day. There were no instances of conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion. There was a statistically significant difference in the EBL (78.19 ± 43.8 ml vs 127.88 ± 69.76 ml, P < .01) and operative time (180.68 ± 48.36 vs 228.85 ± 53.04 minutes, P < .01) between the two groups. There were two cases of bladder laceration in the group with uterine weight exceeding 500 g.
Conclusion: With advanced surgical skills and the adoption of specific techniques, hysterectomy for large uterus can be performed safely and efficiently by MIS.
背景和目的:当子宫大于或等于 18-20 周时,通常采用开腹手术而非微创手术(MIS)切除子宫。然而,与开腹手术相比,微创手术为患者带来了诸多好处。因此,子宫大小不应成为MIS的排除因素。本研究旨在证明MIS用于巨大子宫切除术的可行性和益处,并解释所采用的具体技术:方法:收集了 73 例腹腔镜和机器人子宫切除术病例的数据。根据子宫重量(≥500 克 vs 结果)将病例分为两组:两组的平均标本重量分别为 244 ± 102.75 g vs 903 ± 438.18 g(P P P P 结论:通过先进的手术技能和采用特定的技术,可以通过 MIS 安全高效地实施巨大子宫切除术。
期刊介绍:
JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.