Turkish validity and reliability of the universal mental health literacy scale for adolescents (10-14 years): A methodological study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gülzade Uysal, Remziye Semerci, Rukiye Şengün, Duygu Sönmez Düzkaya
{"title":"Turkish validity and reliability of the universal mental health literacy scale for adolescents (10-14 years): A methodological study.","authors":"Gülzade Uysal, Remziye Semerci, Rukiye Şengün, Duygu Sönmez Düzkaya","doi":"10.1111/jep.14171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Mental health literacy enables adolescents to acquire information that will accompany them in their future lives and to define their attitudes and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the Turkish validity and reliability of the Universal Mental Health Literacy Scale for Adolescents (10-14 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a methodological, correlational, cross-sectional, and descriptive study. The study was conducted with 223 adolescents. Data were collected by 'Information Form' and 'Universal Mental Health Literacy Scale for Adolescents.' Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and Pearson Correlation analysis were used to assess the validity and reliability of the UMHL-A.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) scores ranged from 0.94 to 0.96, while the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) was 0.95. For 'Help-seeking and Stigma dimensions' χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 3.347, NFI = 0.804, IFI = 0.854, TLI = 0.778, CFI = 0.849, RMSEA = 0.103. For 'Knowledge of Mental Health and Knowledge of Mental Illnesses dimensions' χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.959, NFI = 0.731, IFI = 0.847, TLI = 0.774, CFI = 0.837, RMSEA = 0.066. The internal consistency and time stability were affirmed by a Hotelling T-square value of 15.241 and an F-test result of 27.793.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals that the Turkish validity and reliability of the Universal Mental Health Literacy Scale for Adolescents is a valid and reliable tool for assessing mental health literacy among adolescents. The UMHL-A scale is a valid tool to evaluate critical aspects of mental health literacy in adolescent populations and can be used in both research and clinical practice in mental health education and intervention. It is recommended that the Turkish version of the Universal Mental Health Literacy Scale should be used to determine resilience in adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Mental health literacy enables adolescents to acquire information that will accompany them in their future lives and to define their attitudes and behaviors.

Aims and objectives: This study evaluated the Turkish validity and reliability of the Universal Mental Health Literacy Scale for Adolescents (10-14 years).

Methods: This is a methodological, correlational, cross-sectional, and descriptive study. The study was conducted with 223 adolescents. Data were collected by 'Information Form' and 'Universal Mental Health Literacy Scale for Adolescents.' Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and Pearson Correlation analysis were used to assess the validity and reliability of the UMHL-A.

Results: Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) scores ranged from 0.94 to 0.96, while the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) was 0.95. For 'Help-seeking and Stigma dimensions' χ2/df = 3.347, NFI = 0.804, IFI = 0.854, TLI = 0.778, CFI = 0.849, RMSEA = 0.103. For 'Knowledge of Mental Health and Knowledge of Mental Illnesses dimensions' χ2/df = 1.959, NFI = 0.731, IFI = 0.847, TLI = 0.774, CFI = 0.837, RMSEA = 0.066. The internal consistency and time stability were affirmed by a Hotelling T-square value of 15.241 and an F-test result of 27.793.

Conclusions: This study reveals that the Turkish validity and reliability of the Universal Mental Health Literacy Scale for Adolescents is a valid and reliable tool for assessing mental health literacy among adolescents. The UMHL-A scale is a valid tool to evaluate critical aspects of mental health literacy in adolescent populations and can be used in both research and clinical practice in mental health education and intervention. It is recommended that the Turkish version of the Universal Mental Health Literacy Scale should be used to determine resilience in adolescents.

针对青少年(10-14 岁)的通用心理健康知识量表在土耳其的有效性和可靠性:方法研究。
理由心理健康素养使青少年能够获得伴随他们未来生活的信息,并确定他们的态度和行为:本研究评估了土耳其青少年(10-14 岁)通用心理健康素养量表的有效性和可靠性:这是一项方法学、相关性、横断面和描述性研究。研究对象为 223 名青少年。数据通过 "信息表 "和 "青少年通用心理健康素养量表 "收集。采用探索性因子分析、确认性因子分析和皮尔逊相关分析来评估 UMHL-A 的有效性和可靠性:项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)为 0.94 至 0.96,量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)为 0.95。求助和成见维度" χ2/df = 3.347,NFI = 0.804,IFI = 0.854,TLI = 0.778,CFI = 0.849,RMSEA = 0.103。对于 "心理健康知识和心理疾病知识维度",χ2/df = 1.959,NFI = 0.731,IFI = 0.847,TLI = 0.774,CFI = 0.837,RMSEA = 0.066。霍特林 T 方值为 15.241,F 检验结果为 27.793,证实了内部一致性和时间稳定性:本研究揭示了土耳其青少年心理健康素养通用量表的有效性和可靠性,它是评估青少年心理健康素养的有效、可靠的工具。UMHL-A 量表是评估青少年心理健康素养关键方面的有效工具,可用于心理健康教育和干预的研究和临床实践。建议使用土耳其版的通用心理健康素养量表来确定青少年的复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信