Ariel Israel, Kassem Sharif, Galit Zada, Amir Friedenberg, Shlomo Vinker, Adi Lahat
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management: Hospital-based Versus Community-based Care.","authors":"Ariel Israel, Kassem Sharif, Galit Zada, Amir Friedenberg, Shlomo Vinker, Adi Lahat","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses chronic gastrointestinal disorders characterized by recurrent inflammation. Achieving mucosal healing and preventing disease progression are primary treatment goals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare disease characteristics, medication utilization, procedures performed, and hospitalizations between IBD patients treated in hospital and community settings using the Leumit Health Service database.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Leumit Health Service, comprising 3020 patients diagnosed with IBD from January 2010 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided based on primary care setting: hospital-based or community-based. Data included demographic characteristics, disease type, medication usage, procedures, and outcomes. Statistical analyses assessed differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital-treated patients were significantly younger (49.4±18.4 vs. 40.4±18.7, P<0.001 ), had higher rates of Crohn's disease (45.9% vs. 71.4%, P<0.001), exhibited higher inflammatory markers (calprotectin 768±2182 vs. 1305±2526, P<0.001), lower albumin (4.23±0.27 vs. 4.12±0.32, P<0.001), hemoglobin levels (13.4±1.6 vs. 12.9±1.6, P<0.001), and lower BMI (26.2±5.3 vs. 24.6±5.6, P<0.001) compared with community-treated patients. Hospital-treated patients had more endoscopic procedures, higher medication utilization rates, shorter treatment durations, and increased hospitalization occurrence (12.1% vs. 23.6%, P<0.001), length (0.67±3.34 vs. 1.45±5.88, P<0.001), and colectomies (4.73% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities exist in IBD management between hospital and community settings, influenced by disease severity and treatment approaches. Hospital-based care is associated with more aggressive disease and intensive interventions, while community-based care may reflect milder disease and conservative management. Integrating specialized care models and personalized approaches across settings can optimize patient outcomes and health care delivery for IBD management. Further research is needed to understand these disparities' underlying mechanisms and develop comprehensive care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses chronic gastrointestinal disorders characterized by recurrent inflammation. Achieving mucosal healing and preventing disease progression are primary treatment goals.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare disease characteristics, medication utilization, procedures performed, and hospitalizations between IBD patients treated in hospital and community settings using the Leumit Health Service database.
Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Leumit Health Service, comprising 3020 patients diagnosed with IBD from January 2010 to December 2019.
Methods: Patients were divided based on primary care setting: hospital-based or community-based. Data included demographic characteristics, disease type, medication usage, procedures, and outcomes. Statistical analyses assessed differences between groups.
Results: Hospital-treated patients were significantly younger (49.4±18.4 vs. 40.4±18.7, P<0.001 ), had higher rates of Crohn's disease (45.9% vs. 71.4%, P<0.001), exhibited higher inflammatory markers (calprotectin 768±2182 vs. 1305±2526, P<0.001), lower albumin (4.23±0.27 vs. 4.12±0.32, P<0.001), hemoglobin levels (13.4±1.6 vs. 12.9±1.6, P<0.001), and lower BMI (26.2±5.3 vs. 24.6±5.6, P<0.001) compared with community-treated patients. Hospital-treated patients had more endoscopic procedures, higher medication utilization rates, shorter treatment durations, and increased hospitalization occurrence (12.1% vs. 23.6%, P<0.001), length (0.67±3.34 vs. 1.45±5.88, P<0.001), and colectomies (4.73% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001).
Conclusions: Disparities exist in IBD management between hospital and community settings, influenced by disease severity and treatment approaches. Hospital-based care is associated with more aggressive disease and intensive interventions, while community-based care may reflect milder disease and conservative management. Integrating specialized care models and personalized approaches across settings can optimize patient outcomes and health care delivery for IBD management. Further research is needed to understand these disparities' underlying mechanisms and develop comprehensive care strategies.
背景:炎症性肠病(IBD炎症性肠病(IBD)包括以反复炎症为特征的慢性胃肠道疾病。实现粘膜愈合和防止疾病进展是治疗的主要目标:本研究旨在利用 Leumit Health Service 数据库,比较在医院和社区接受治疗的 IBD 患者的疾病特征、用药情况、治疗过程和住院情况:设计:利用Leumit卫生服务机构的数据开展了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象包括2010年1月至2019年12月期间确诊的3020名IBD患者:根据初级医疗机构(医院或社区)对患者进行划分。数据包括人口统计学特征、疾病类型、用药情况、治疗过程和结果。统计分析评估了组间差异:结果:接受医院治疗的患者明显更年轻(49.4±18.4 vs. 40.4±18.7):受疾病严重程度和治疗方法的影响,医院和社区环境下的 IBD 管理存在差异。医院护理与病情较重和强化干预有关,而社区护理可能反映出病情较轻和保守治疗。在不同环境中整合专业护理模式和个性化方法可以优化患者的治疗效果和 IBD 的医疗服务。要了解这些差异的内在机制并制定全面的护理策略,还需要进一步的研究。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.