Efficacy of the peak frequency map for left atrial posterior wall isolation

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shintaro Yamagami MD, Suguru Nishiuchi MD, PhD, Tomohiro Sato MD, Masaya Akiyama CE, Yuta Nakano CE, Kondo Hirokazu MD, PhD, Toshihiro Tamura MD, PhD
{"title":"Efficacy of the peak frequency map for left atrial posterior wall isolation","authors":"Shintaro Yamagami MD,&nbsp;Suguru Nishiuchi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tomohiro Sato MD,&nbsp;Masaya Akiyama CE,&nbsp;Yuta Nakano CE,&nbsp;Kondo Hirokazu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Toshihiro Tamura MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jce.16477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Complete isolation of the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) is challenging owing to overlapping epicardial conduction. Peak frequency (PF) is a novel parameter that focuses on near- and far-field electrogram components. In this study, we aimed to determine whether transmural block completion is related to the ablation site PF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed 44 consecutive patients undergoing initial LAPW isolation (LAPWI) between June 2023 and February 2024. Pre-LAPWI and PF maps were obtained using an HD-Grid catheter. In 17 of the 44 patients (Group-1), LAPWI was performed conventionally. In the remaining 27 patients (Group-2), PF-guided LAPWI was applied based on Group-1 results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In Group-1, the left atrial (LA) roof and floor line success rates were 58.8% and 76.5%, respectively. The average PF value in the roof lines of patients with a completed block line was significantly higher than that of the remaining patients (286.6 ± 29.3 Hz vs. 236.1 ± 40.9 Hz, <i>p</i> = .012), but the floor lines were similar. In Group-2, relatively high PF values were targeted to achieve complete block of the LA roof and floor lines, following the results obtained in Group-1. The LA roof line success rates (92.6% vs. 58.8%, <i>p</i> = .007), total number of radiofrequency (RF) applications (22.7 ± 5.6 vs. 27.6 ± 8.5, <i>p</i> = .03), and procedural time (32.6 ± 18.3 vs. 47.9 ± 25.6 min, <i>p</i> = .03) differed between Group-1 and Group-2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Using a PF map for determining the optimal ablation line for LAPWI by RF catheter ablation is feasible.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 1","pages":"42-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Complete isolation of the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) is challenging owing to overlapping epicardial conduction. Peak frequency (PF) is a novel parameter that focuses on near- and far-field electrogram components. In this study, we aimed to determine whether transmural block completion is related to the ablation site PF.

Methods

We analyzed 44 consecutive patients undergoing initial LAPW isolation (LAPWI) between June 2023 and February 2024. Pre-LAPWI and PF maps were obtained using an HD-Grid catheter. In 17 of the 44 patients (Group-1), LAPWI was performed conventionally. In the remaining 27 patients (Group-2), PF-guided LAPWI was applied based on Group-1 results.

Results

In Group-1, the left atrial (LA) roof and floor line success rates were 58.8% and 76.5%, respectively. The average PF value in the roof lines of patients with a completed block line was significantly higher than that of the remaining patients (286.6 ± 29.3 Hz vs. 236.1 ± 40.9 Hz, p = .012), but the floor lines were similar. In Group-2, relatively high PF values were targeted to achieve complete block of the LA roof and floor lines, following the results obtained in Group-1. The LA roof line success rates (92.6% vs. 58.8%, p = .007), total number of radiofrequency (RF) applications (22.7 ± 5.6 vs. 27.6 ± 8.5, p = .03), and procedural time (32.6 ± 18.3 vs. 47.9 ± 25.6 min, p = .03) differed between Group-1 and Group-2.

Conclusion

Using a PF map for determining the optimal ablation line for LAPWI by RF catheter ablation is feasible.

峰值频率图对左心房后壁隔离的功效。
简介:由于心外膜传导重叠,完全隔离左心房后壁(LAPW)具有挑战性。峰值频率(PF)是一个新颖的参数,侧重于近场和远场电图成分。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定跨壁阻滞的完成是否与消融部位的峰频有关:我们分析了 2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 2 月间接受初次 LAPWI(LAPWI)的 44 例连续患者。使用 HD-Grid 导管获取了 LAPWI 前和 PF 图。44 名患者中有 17 名(第 1 组)采用传统的 LAPWI 方法。其余 27 名患者(第 2 组)在第 1 组结果的基础上进行了 PF 引导的 LAPWI:结果:在第一组中,左心房(LA)顶线和底线的成功率分别为 58.8% 和 76.5%。已完成阻塞线的患者房顶线的平均 PF 值明显高于其余患者(286.6 ± 29.3 Hz vs. 236.1 ± 40.9 Hz,p = .012),但房底线的情况相似。在第 2 组中,根据第 1 组的结果,以相对较高的 PF 值为目标,以实现 LA 顶线和底线的完全阻断。第一组和第二组的 LA 顶线成功率(92.6% vs. 58.8%,p = .007)、射频 (RF) 应用总次数(22.7 ± 5.6 vs. 27.6 ± 8.5,p = .03)和手术时间(32.6 ± 18.3 vs. 47.9 ± 25.6 分钟,p = .03)均有所不同:结论:使用射频导管消融术确定 LAPWI 最佳消融线的 PF 图是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信