Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in NRG Oncology Phase III Randomized Trials Using Multimodal Deep Learning With Digital Histopathology.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00145
Jonathan David Tward, Huei-Chung Huang, Andre Esteva, Osama Mohamad, Douwe van der Wal, Jeffry P Simko, Sandy DeVries, Jingbin Zhang, Songwan Joun, Timothy N Showalter, Edward M Schaeffer, Todd M Morgan, Jedidiah M Monson, James A Wallace, Jean-Paul Bahary, Howard M Sandler, Daniel E Spratt, Joseph P Rodgers, Felix Y Feng, Phuoc T Tran
{"title":"Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in NRG Oncology Phase III Randomized Trials Using Multimodal Deep Learning With Digital Histopathology.","authors":"Jonathan David Tward, Huei-Chung Huang, Andre Esteva, Osama Mohamad, Douwe van der Wal, Jeffry P Simko, Sandy DeVries, Jingbin Zhang, Songwan Joun, Timothy N Showalter, Edward M Schaeffer, Todd M Morgan, Jedidiah M Monson, James A Wallace, Jean-Paul Bahary, Howard M Sandler, Daniel E Spratt, Joseph P Rodgers, Felix Y Feng, Phuoc T Tran","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current clinical risk stratification methods for localized prostate cancer are suboptimal, leading to over- and undertreatment. Recently, machine learning approaches using digital histopathology have shown superior prognostic ability in phase III trials. This study aims to develop a clinically usable risk grouping system using multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) models that outperform current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The cohort comprised 9,787 patients with localized prostate cancer from eight NRG Oncology randomized phase III trials, treated with radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. Locked MMAI models, which used digital histopathology images and clinical data, were applied to each patient. Expert consensus on cut points defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups on the basis of 10-year distant metastasis rates of 3% and 10%, respectively. The MMAI's reclassification and prognostic performance were compared with the three-tier NCCN risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up for censored patients was 7.9 years. According to NCCN risk categories, 30.4% of patients were low-risk, 25.5% intermediate-risk, and 44.1% high-risk. The MMAI risk classification identified 43.5% of patients as low-risk, 34.6% as intermediate-risk, and 21.8% as high-risk. MMAI reclassified 1,039 (42.0%) patients initially categorized by NCCN. Despite the MMAI low-risk group being larger than the NCCN low-risk group, the 10-year metastasis risks were comparable: 1.7% (95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2) for NCCN and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.7) for MMAI. The overall 10-year metastasis risk for NCCN high-risk patients was 16.6%, with MMAI further stratifying this group into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, showing metastasis rates of 3.4%, 8.2%, and 26.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MMAI risk grouping system expands the population of men identified as having low metastatic risk and accurately pinpoints a high-risk subset with elevated metastasis rates. This approach aims to prevent both overtreatment and undertreatment in localized prostate cancer, facilitating shared decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400145"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Current clinical risk stratification methods for localized prostate cancer are suboptimal, leading to over- and undertreatment. Recently, machine learning approaches using digital histopathology have shown superior prognostic ability in phase III trials. This study aims to develop a clinically usable risk grouping system using multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) models that outperform current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups.

Materials and methods: The cohort comprised 9,787 patients with localized prostate cancer from eight NRG Oncology randomized phase III trials, treated with radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. Locked MMAI models, which used digital histopathology images and clinical data, were applied to each patient. Expert consensus on cut points defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups on the basis of 10-year distant metastasis rates of 3% and 10%, respectively. The MMAI's reclassification and prognostic performance were compared with the three-tier NCCN risk groups.

Results: The median follow-up for censored patients was 7.9 years. According to NCCN risk categories, 30.4% of patients were low-risk, 25.5% intermediate-risk, and 44.1% high-risk. The MMAI risk classification identified 43.5% of patients as low-risk, 34.6% as intermediate-risk, and 21.8% as high-risk. MMAI reclassified 1,039 (42.0%) patients initially categorized by NCCN. Despite the MMAI low-risk group being larger than the NCCN low-risk group, the 10-year metastasis risks were comparable: 1.7% (95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2) for NCCN and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.7) for MMAI. The overall 10-year metastasis risk for NCCN high-risk patients was 16.6%, with MMAI further stratifying this group into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, showing metastasis rates of 3.4%, 8.2%, and 26.3%, respectively.

Conclusion: The MMAI risk grouping system expands the population of men identified as having low metastatic risk and accurately pinpoints a high-risk subset with elevated metastasis rates. This approach aims to prevent both overtreatment and undertreatment in localized prostate cancer, facilitating shared decision making.

利用数字组织病理学进行多模态深度学习,在 NRG 肿瘤学 III 期随机试验中进行前列腺癌风险分层。
目的:目前针对局部前列腺癌的临床风险分层方法不够理想,导致过度治疗或治疗不足。最近,利用数字组织病理学的机器学习方法在 III 期试验中显示出了卓越的预后能力。本研究旨在利用多模态人工智能(MMAI)模型开发一种临床可用的风险分组系统,该系统优于当前的美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)风险分组:研究对象包括来自八项NRG肿瘤学随机III期试验的9787名局部前列腺癌患者,这些患者接受了放疗、雄激素剥夺疗法和/或化疗。锁定的 MMAI 模型使用数字组织病理学图像和临床数据,适用于每位患者。专家就切点达成共识,根据 10 年远处转移率分别为 3% 和 10% 的标准定义了低危、中危和高危组。MMAI的重新分类和预后效果与NCCN三级风险组进行了比较:筛查出的患者的中位随访时间为 7.9 年。根据 NCCN 风险分类,30.4% 的患者为低风险,25.5% 为中风险,44.1% 为高风险。MMAI风险分类将43.5%的患者确定为低风险,34.6%为中风险,21.8%为高风险。MMAI 对 1,039 名(42.0%)最初由 NCCN 分类的患者进行了重新分类。尽管 MMAI 低风险组的人数多于 NCCN 低风险组,但 10 年转移风险却相当:NCCN为1.7%(95% CI,0.2至3.2),MMAI为3.2%(95% CI,1.7至4.7)。NCCN高危患者的10年总体转移风险为16.6%,MMAI将这一群体进一步分为低危、中危和高危,转移率分别为3.4%、8.2%和26.3%:MMAI风险分组系统扩大了被确定为低转移风险的男性人群,并准确定位了转移率较高的高风险亚群。这种方法旨在防止局部前列腺癌的过度治疗和治疗不足,促进共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信