Charlotte Bernard, Hélène Font, Natalia Zotova, Kara Wools-Kaloustian, Suzanne Goodrich, Edith Kamaru Kwobah, Ajeh Rogers Awoh, Guy Calvin Nko'o Mbongo'o, Dominique Mahambu Nsonde, Paul Gandou, Albert Minga, Judicaël Malick Tine, Ibrahima Ndiaye, François Dabis, Moussa Seydi, Nathalie de Rekeneire, Marcel Yotebieng, Antoine Jaquet
{"title":"Accuracy of Alternative PHQ-9 Scoring Algorithms to Screen for Depression in People Living With HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Charlotte Bernard, Hélène Font, Natalia Zotova, Kara Wools-Kaloustian, Suzanne Goodrich, Edith Kamaru Kwobah, Ajeh Rogers Awoh, Guy Calvin Nko'o Mbongo'o, Dominique Mahambu Nsonde, Paul Gandou, Albert Minga, Judicaël Malick Tine, Ibrahima Ndiaye, François Dabis, Moussa Seydi, Nathalie de Rekeneire, Marcel Yotebieng, Antoine Jaquet","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening for depression remains a priority for people living with HIV (PLWH) accessing care. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely used depression screening tool, but has limited accuracy when applied across various cultural contexts. We aimed to evaluate the performance of alternative PHQ-9 scoring algorithms in sub-Saharan African PLWH.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five HIV programs in Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, Senegal, and the Republic of Congo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult PLWH were screened for depression during the 2018-2022 period. Diagnosis confirmation was done by psychiatrist blinded clinical evaluation (gold standard). Diagnostic performances, including sensitivity and area under the curve (AUC) of the traditional PHQ-9 scoring (positive screening - score ≥ 10), were compared to alternative scoring algorithms including (1) the presence of ≥1 mood symptom (PHQ-9 items 1 and 2) combined with ≥2 other symptoms listed in the PHQ-9, and (2) a simplified recoding of each 4-response item into 2 categories (absence/presence).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 735 participants were included [54% women, median age 42 years (interquartile range 34-50)]. Depression was diagnosed by a psychiatrist in 95 (13%) participants. Alternative scoring sensitivities (0.59-0.74) were higher than that of the traditional score's (0.39). Compared to traditional scoring, AUC was significantly higher for PHQ-9 alternative scoring. Across settings, alternative scoring algorithms increased sensitivity and reduced variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a primary screening test, new scoring algorithms seemed to improve the PHQ-9 sensitivity in identifying depression and reducing heterogeneity across settings. This alternative might be considered to identify PLWH in need of referral for further diagnostic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":" ","pages":"143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Screening for depression remains a priority for people living with HIV (PLWH) accessing care. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely used depression screening tool, but has limited accuracy when applied across various cultural contexts. We aimed to evaluate the performance of alternative PHQ-9 scoring algorithms in sub-Saharan African PLWH.
Setting: Five HIV programs in Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, Senegal, and the Republic of Congo.
Methods: Adult PLWH were screened for depression during the 2018-2022 period. Diagnosis confirmation was done by psychiatrist blinded clinical evaluation (gold standard). Diagnostic performances, including sensitivity and area under the curve (AUC) of the traditional PHQ-9 scoring (positive screening - score ≥ 10), were compared to alternative scoring algorithms including (1) the presence of ≥1 mood symptom (PHQ-9 items 1 and 2) combined with ≥2 other symptoms listed in the PHQ-9, and (2) a simplified recoding of each 4-response item into 2 categories (absence/presence).
Results: A total of 735 participants were included [54% women, median age 42 years (interquartile range 34-50)]. Depression was diagnosed by a psychiatrist in 95 (13%) participants. Alternative scoring sensitivities (0.59-0.74) were higher than that of the traditional score's (0.39). Compared to traditional scoring, AUC was significantly higher for PHQ-9 alternative scoring. Across settings, alternative scoring algorithms increased sensitivity and reduced variability.
Conclusions: As a primary screening test, new scoring algorithms seemed to improve the PHQ-9 sensitivity in identifying depression and reducing heterogeneity across settings. This alternative might be considered to identify PLWH in need of referral for further diagnostic evaluations.
期刊介绍:
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide.
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.