Development and validation of a predictive scoring system for hypoglycaemic agents for optimal control of blood glucose during glucocorticoid therapy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ayaka Kato, Masayuki Fuwa, Motochika Asano, Ichiro Mori, Saori Iida, Hideyuki Okada, Yoshihiro Uno, Kei Fujioka, Hiroyuki Morita
{"title":"Development and validation of a predictive scoring system for hypoglycaemic agents for optimal control of blood glucose during glucocorticoid therapy.","authors":"Ayaka Kato, Masayuki Fuwa, Motochika Asano, Ichiro Mori, Saori Iida, Hideyuki Okada, Yoshihiro Uno, Kei Fujioka, Hiroyuki Morita","doi":"10.1111/imj.16547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucocorticoid (GC) treatments are often used. There is limited information on the prediction of hyperglycaemia after GC administration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to identify the risk factors for hyperglycaemia after glucocorticoid (GC) administration and the need for hypoglycaemic agents to correct it and to develop and validate a novel scoring system for predicting GC-induced hyperglycaemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a development set, 508 adults receiving prednisolone (PSL) for the first time were divided into two groups based on treatment with or without hypoglycaemic agents. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared, and risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis after performing univariate analyses between the two groups. A point-addition scoring system with several categories and coefficients for each risk factor was constructed to predict the need for hypoglycaemic agents. The scoring system was then applied and validated on two validation sets: A and B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older age, higher glycated haemoglobin percentage, body mass index and initial PSL dosage were identified as risk factors. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the scoring system were 70.6%, 81.9% and 77.1% in the development set; 75.8%, 78.4% and 77.4% in validation set A; and 79.4%, 73.9% and 75.3% in validation set B respectively. By fitting the total score in the development set and the probability of hyperglycaemia to a logistic curve, a figure was created to show the probability of GC-induced hyperglycaemia in patients scheduled to receive GC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoring system is a novel, valid and reliable tool for predicting GC-induced hyperglycaemia and the need for hypoglycaemic agents to correct it.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glucocorticoid (GC) treatments are often used. There is limited information on the prediction of hyperglycaemia after GC administration.

Aims: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for hyperglycaemia after glucocorticoid (GC) administration and the need for hypoglycaemic agents to correct it and to develop and validate a novel scoring system for predicting GC-induced hyperglycaemia.

Methods: In a development set, 508 adults receiving prednisolone (PSL) for the first time were divided into two groups based on treatment with or without hypoglycaemic agents. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared, and risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis after performing univariate analyses between the two groups. A point-addition scoring system with several categories and coefficients for each risk factor was constructed to predict the need for hypoglycaemic agents. The scoring system was then applied and validated on two validation sets: A and B.

Results: Older age, higher glycated haemoglobin percentage, body mass index and initial PSL dosage were identified as risk factors. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the scoring system were 70.6%, 81.9% and 77.1% in the development set; 75.8%, 78.4% and 77.4% in validation set A; and 79.4%, 73.9% and 75.3% in validation set B respectively. By fitting the total score in the development set and the probability of hyperglycaemia to a logistic curve, a figure was created to show the probability of GC-induced hyperglycaemia in patients scheduled to receive GC.

Conclusion: This scoring system is a novel, valid and reliable tool for predicting GC-induced hyperglycaemia and the need for hypoglycaemic agents to correct it.

开发和验证降糖药物预测评分系统,以优化糖皮质激素治疗期间的血糖控制。
背景:糖皮质激素(GC)是常用的治疗药物。目的:本研究旨在确定使用糖皮质激素(GC)后出现高血糖的风险因素,以及是否需要使用降糖药物来纠正高血糖,并开发和验证一种预测 GC 引起的高血糖的新型评分系统:在一个开发组中,首次接受泼尼松龙(PSL)治疗的508名成人根据使用或不使用降糖药物分为两组。在对两组进行单变量分析后,比较了临床和实验室参数,并使用逻辑回归分析确定了风险因素。为预测是否需要使用降糖药,建立了一个加分评分系统,每个风险因素都有若干类别和系数。然后在两个验证组中应用并验证了该评分系统:结果:结果:年龄较大、糖化血红蛋白百分比较高、体重指数和初始 PSL 剂量被确定为风险因素。在开发集中,评分系统的灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为 70.6%、81.9% 和 77.1%;在验证集 A 中分别为 75.8%、78.4% 和 77.4%;在验证集 B 中分别为 79.4%、73.9% 和 75.3%。通过将开发集的总分和高血糖发生概率拟合到一条逻辑曲线上,绘制出了一张图表,显示了计划接受 GC 治疗的患者发生 GC 引起的高血糖的概率:该评分系统是一种新颖、有效和可靠的工具,可用于预测 GC 引起的高血糖以及是否需要使用降糖药物来纠正高血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信