Impact of irrigation flow rates on lesion size and safety of ablation catheters: an ex vivo porcine heart study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Morio Ono, Takamasa Ishikawa, Yui Koyanagi, Yuma Gibo, Soichiro Usumoto, Jumpei Saito, Toshihiko Gokan, Toshitaka Okabe, Naoei Isomura, Mitunori Muto, Masaru Shiigai, Jyunko Hone, Masahiko Ochiai
{"title":"Impact of irrigation flow rates on lesion size and safety of ablation catheters: an ex vivo porcine heart study.","authors":"Morio Ono, Takamasa Ishikawa, Yui Koyanagi, Yuma Gibo, Soichiro Usumoto, Jumpei Saito, Toshihiko Gokan, Toshitaka Okabe, Naoei Isomura, Mitunori Muto, Masaru Shiigai, Jyunko Hone, Masahiko Ochiai","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02475-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is a well-established therapeutic approach for treating arrhythmias, where lesion size and safety are critical for efficacy. This study explored the impact of varying irrigation flow rates on lesion characteristics using the TactiFlex™ SE Ablation Catheter (TF) in an ex vivo porcine heart model, focusing on the size and safety outcomes associated with low versus standard flow rates. Myocardial slabs from porcine hearts were subjected to ablation using two types of irrigated catheters. Lesion formation was compared between low (8 mL/min for TF) and standard irrigation flow rates (13 mL/min for TF) across different power settings (30, 40, and 50 W). Outcome measures included lesion dimensions, incidence of steam pops, and impedance drops. A total of 210 lesions were generated under various settings. At low flow rates, the TF catheter safely formed larger lesions compared to the standard flow rates without a significant increase in steam pops or impedance drops. Lesions at low flow rates were comparable in size to those formed using other catheters under the standard settings. Conversely, the standard flow settings for TF produced smaller lesions but exhibited higher safety profiles, as evidenced by fewer steam pops and impedance drops. Lower irrigation flow rates using a TF catheter can achieve larger lesions without compromising safety, offering an optimization strategy for RF ablation procedures that balances efficacy and safety. These findings may guide clinicians in tailoring ablation strategies according to individual patient needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02475-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is a well-established therapeutic approach for treating arrhythmias, where lesion size and safety are critical for efficacy. This study explored the impact of varying irrigation flow rates on lesion characteristics using the TactiFlex™ SE Ablation Catheter (TF) in an ex vivo porcine heart model, focusing on the size and safety outcomes associated with low versus standard flow rates. Myocardial slabs from porcine hearts were subjected to ablation using two types of irrigated catheters. Lesion formation was compared between low (8 mL/min for TF) and standard irrigation flow rates (13 mL/min for TF) across different power settings (30, 40, and 50 W). Outcome measures included lesion dimensions, incidence of steam pops, and impedance drops. A total of 210 lesions were generated under various settings. At low flow rates, the TF catheter safely formed larger lesions compared to the standard flow rates without a significant increase in steam pops or impedance drops. Lesions at low flow rates were comparable in size to those formed using other catheters under the standard settings. Conversely, the standard flow settings for TF produced smaller lesions but exhibited higher safety profiles, as evidenced by fewer steam pops and impedance drops. Lower irrigation flow rates using a TF catheter can achieve larger lesions without compromising safety, offering an optimization strategy for RF ablation procedures that balances efficacy and safety. These findings may guide clinicians in tailoring ablation strategies according to individual patient needs.

灌注流速对病灶大小和消融导管安全性的影响:猪心脏体外研究。
射频(RF)导管消融是治疗心律失常的一种行之有效的治疗方法,其病灶大小和安全性对疗效至关重要。本研究在活体猪心脏模型中使用 TactiFlex™ SE 消融导管(TF)探索了不同灌注流速对病变特征的影响,重点研究了低流速与标准流速的相关尺寸和安全性结果。使用两种类型的灌注导管对猪心的心肌片进行消融。在不同功率设置(30、40 和 50 瓦)下,对低灌注流速(TF 为 8 毫升/分钟)和标准灌注流速(TF 为 13 毫升/分钟)下的病灶形成进行了比较。结果测量包括病变尺寸、蒸汽爆裂发生率和阻抗下降。在不同的设置下,共产生了 210 个病灶。与标准流速相比,在低流速下,TF 导管能安全地形成更大的病灶,而蒸汽爆裂或阻抗下降的情况不会明显增加。低流速下形成的病变大小与使用其他导管在标准设置下形成的病变大小相当。相反,TF 的标准流量设置产生的病变较小,但安全性较高,蒸汽爆裂和阻抗下降较少就是证明。使用 TF 导管的较低灌注流速可以在不影响安全性的情况下形成较大的病灶,为射频消融手术提供了一种兼顾疗效和安全性的优化策略。这些发现可指导临床医生根据患者的不同需求制定消融策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信