Julian Chavarriaga, Roderick Clark, Eshetu G Atenafu, Lynn Anson-Cartwright, Padraig Warde, Peter Chung, Philippe L Bedard, Di Maria Jiang, Martin O'Malley, Susan Prendeville, Michael Jewett, Robert J Hamilton
{"title":"Long-term Relapse and Survival in Clinical Stage I Testicular Teratoma.","authors":"Julian Chavarriaga, Roderick Clark, Eshetu G Atenafu, Lynn Anson-Cartwright, Padraig Warde, Peter Chung, Philippe L Bedard, Di Maria Jiang, Martin O'Malley, Susan Prendeville, Michael Jewett, Robert J Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Studies in metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor (NSGCT) suggest that the presence of teratomatous elements in the primary tumor is a risk factor for poor survival. Many guidelines have extrapolated this observation and recommend adjuvant retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) even for clinical stage I (CSI) teratoma confined to the testicle. Our objective was to assess relapse-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) among patients with CSI pure teratoma in comparison to CSI NSGCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CSI NSGCT managed with surveillance between 1980 and 2023 were identified in the prospectively maintained Princess Margaret Cancer Centre database. We compared cases with pure teratoma with or without somatic transformation in the primary tumor to all other nonteratomatous NSGCTs.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 774 patients with CSI NSGCT were identified, including 63 (8.1%) with pure teratoma and/or somatic transformation in the primary tumor. Median follow-up was 61 mo. The pure teratoma group had superior RFS at 6 yr (85.2% vs 67.9%; p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in 6-yr CSS (100% vs 99.1%; p = 0.92) or OS (97.4% vs 98.1%; p = 0.33). Limitations include the single-center setting and the limited follow-up (median 61 mo), hindering the ability to detect late relapses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CSI pure teratoma managed with surveillance is associated with a low risk of relapse overall and significantly lower risk of relapse in comparison to other CSI NSGCTs. No patients with CSI teratoma in the study population died of testicular cancer. Guidelines should be revised to include surveillance as a preferred approach for CSI teratoma.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We compared survival rates after testicle removal in clinical stage I testicular cancer for two different tumor types. We found that cancer-specific and overall survival rates were similar for pure teratoma tumors and nonseminoma tumors, and that the recurrence rate was lower for pure teratoma tumors. Our results support surveillance as a suitable option after surgery for patients with clinical stage I testicular teratoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.10.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Studies in metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor (NSGCT) suggest that the presence of teratomatous elements in the primary tumor is a risk factor for poor survival. Many guidelines have extrapolated this observation and recommend adjuvant retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) even for clinical stage I (CSI) teratoma confined to the testicle. Our objective was to assess relapse-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) among patients with CSI pure teratoma in comparison to CSI NSGCT.
Methods: Patients with CSI NSGCT managed with surveillance between 1980 and 2023 were identified in the prospectively maintained Princess Margaret Cancer Centre database. We compared cases with pure teratoma with or without somatic transformation in the primary tumor to all other nonteratomatous NSGCTs.
Key findings and limitations: A total of 774 patients with CSI NSGCT were identified, including 63 (8.1%) with pure teratoma and/or somatic transformation in the primary tumor. Median follow-up was 61 mo. The pure teratoma group had superior RFS at 6 yr (85.2% vs 67.9%; p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in 6-yr CSS (100% vs 99.1%; p = 0.92) or OS (97.4% vs 98.1%; p = 0.33). Limitations include the single-center setting and the limited follow-up (median 61 mo), hindering the ability to detect late relapses.
Conclusions and clinical implications: CSI pure teratoma managed with surveillance is associated with a low risk of relapse overall and significantly lower risk of relapse in comparison to other CSI NSGCTs. No patients with CSI teratoma in the study population died of testicular cancer. Guidelines should be revised to include surveillance as a preferred approach for CSI teratoma.
Patient summary: We compared survival rates after testicle removal in clinical stage I testicular cancer for two different tumor types. We found that cancer-specific and overall survival rates were similar for pure teratoma tumors and nonseminoma tumors, and that the recurrence rate was lower for pure teratoma tumors. Our results support surveillance as a suitable option after surgery for patients with clinical stage I testicular teratoma.
背景和目的:对转移性非肉芽肿性生殖细胞瘤(NSGCT)的研究表明,原发肿瘤中存在畸胎瘤成分是导致生存率低下的一个危险因素。许多指南推断了这一观察结果,并建议即使是局限于睾丸的临床 I 期(CSI)畸胎瘤也要进行辅助性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RPLND)。我们的目的是评估 CSI 纯畸胎瘤患者的无复发生存率(RFS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS),并与 CSI NSGCT 进行比较:从玛格丽特公主癌症中心的前瞻性数据库中筛选出1980年至2023年间接受监控治疗的CSI NSGCT患者。我们将原发肿瘤中伴有或不伴有体细胞转化的纯畸胎瘤病例与所有其他非畸胎瘤性NSGCT病例进行了比较:共发现774例CSI NSGCT患者,其中63例(8.1%)原发肿瘤为纯畸胎瘤和/或体细胞变异,中位随访时间为61个月。纯畸胎瘤组的6年RFS较好(85.2% vs 67.9%; p = 0.008)。6年CSS(100% vs 99.1%;p = 0.92)或OS(97.4% vs 98.1%;p = 0.33)无明显差异。结论和临床意义:结论和临床意义:与其他CSI NSGCTs相比,CSI纯畸胎瘤通过监测治疗的复发风险总体较低,复发风险显著降低。研究人群中没有CSI畸胎瘤患者死于睾丸癌。患者总结:我们比较了两种不同肿瘤类型的临床I期睾丸癌患者切除睾丸后的生存率。我们发现,纯畸胎瘤和非畸胎瘤的癌症特异性生存率和总生存率相似,而纯畸胎瘤的复发率较低。我们的研究结果支持将监测作为临床 I 期睾丸畸胎瘤患者术后的合适选择。
期刊介绍:
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.