The impact of large aneurysm diameter on the outcomes of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair by fenestrated and branched endografts.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Enrico Gallitto, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Paolo Spath, Gianluca Faggioli, Jan Stana, Antonino Logiacco, Carlota Fernandez-Prendes, Rodolfo Pini, Barbara Rantner, Chiara Mascoli, Antonio Cappiello, Mauro Gargiulo
{"title":"The impact of large aneurysm diameter on the outcomes of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair by fenestrated and branched endografts.","authors":"Enrico Gallitto, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Paolo Spath, Gianluca Faggioli, Jan Stana, Antonino Logiacco, Carlota Fernandez-Prendes, Rodolfo Pini, Barbara Rantner, Chiara Mascoli, Antonio Cappiello, Mauro Gargiulo","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezae387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aim of the study was to analyse the impact of preoperative thoracoabdominal aneurysm diameter on the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endografting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent endovascular thoracoabdominal repair at 2 European centres (2011-2021) were analysed. Median diameter was calculated; the third quartile was considered a cut-off. Outcomes were compared in 2 groups based on the diameter value. Primary endpoints were technical success, spinal cord ischaemia and 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Survival, freedom from reintervention and target visceral vessels instability were follow-up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 247 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, the median diameter was 65 mm, first quartile was 57 mm; third quartile was 80 mm, set as cut-off value. Fifty-nine (24%) patients had diameter ≥80 mm. Custom-made and off-the-shelf branched endograft were used in 160 (65%) and 87 (35%), respectively. Technical success was 93% (<80 mm: 91% vs ≥80 mm: 94%; P = 0.47). Twenty-three (9%) patients had spinal injury (<80 mm: 7% vs ≥80mm: 17%; P = 0.03). Twenty-two (9%) patients died within 30-day/in-hospital (<80 mm: 7% vs ≥80 mm: 15%; P = 0.06). Multivariate analysis did not report preoperative diameter ≥80 mm as significant risk factor for primary endpoints. The median follow-up was 13 (interquartile range: 2-37) months and at 3-year survival and freedom from reintervention rates were 65% and 62%, respectively. After univariate and multivariate analyses, preoperative diameter ≥80 mm was considered an independent risk factor for reinterventions [hazard ratio (HR): 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.6; P = 0.04], and for target visceral vessels instability (HR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.3-5.1; P = 0.04), occurred in 45 (18%) cases. However, after competing risk methods, preoperative diameter did not show significance for follow-up results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A preoperative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm diameter >80 mm has not had a direct impact on early technical and clinical outcomes. A diameter≥80 mm is considered risk factor for reinterventions and target vessels instability is considered separately during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Aim of the study was to analyse the impact of preoperative thoracoabdominal aneurysm diameter on the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endografting.

Methods: Patients who underwent endovascular thoracoabdominal repair at 2 European centres (2011-2021) were analysed. Median diameter was calculated; the third quartile was considered a cut-off. Outcomes were compared in 2 groups based on the diameter value. Primary endpoints were technical success, spinal cord ischaemia and 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Survival, freedom from reintervention and target visceral vessels instability were follow-up outcomes.

Results: Out of 247 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, the median diameter was 65 mm, first quartile was 57 mm; third quartile was 80 mm, set as cut-off value. Fifty-nine (24%) patients had diameter ≥80 mm. Custom-made and off-the-shelf branched endograft were used in 160 (65%) and 87 (35%), respectively. Technical success was 93% (<80 mm: 91% vs ≥80 mm: 94%; P = 0.47). Twenty-three (9%) patients had spinal injury (<80 mm: 7% vs ≥80mm: 17%; P = 0.03). Twenty-two (9%) patients died within 30-day/in-hospital (<80 mm: 7% vs ≥80 mm: 15%; P = 0.06). Multivariate analysis did not report preoperative diameter ≥80 mm as significant risk factor for primary endpoints. The median follow-up was 13 (interquartile range: 2-37) months and at 3-year survival and freedom from reintervention rates were 65% and 62%, respectively. After univariate and multivariate analyses, preoperative diameter ≥80 mm was considered an independent risk factor for reinterventions [hazard ratio (HR): 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.6; P = 0.04], and for target visceral vessels instability (HR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.3-5.1; P = 0.04), occurred in 45 (18%) cases. However, after competing risk methods, preoperative diameter did not show significance for follow-up results.

Conclusions: A preoperative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm diameter >80 mm has not had a direct impact on early technical and clinical outcomes. A diameter≥80 mm is considered risk factor for reinterventions and target vessels instability is considered separately during follow-up.

大动脉瘤直径对使用栅栏式和分支式内移植物修补胸腹动脉瘤结果的影响。
研究目的该研究旨在分析术前胸腹动脉瘤直径对栅栏式/分支式内植术效果的影响:分析了在欧洲 2 个中心接受血管内胸腹修复术的患者(2011-2021 年)。计算中位直径;将第三四分位数作为截止值。根据直径值对两组结果进行比较。主要终点是技术成功率、脊髓缺血和30天/住院死亡率。随访结果包括存活率、不再干预的自由度和靶内脏血管不稳定性:结果:在247个胸腹主动脉瘤中,中位直径为65毫米,第一四分位数为57毫米,第三四分位数为80毫米,设定为临界值。59例(24%)患者的直径≥80毫米。160例(65%)和87例(35%)分别使用了定制和现成的支链内植物。技术成功率为 93%(结论:术前胸腹主动脉瘤直径大于80毫米对早期技术和临床结果没有直接影响。直径≥80毫米被认为是再次手术的风险因素,在随访过程中应单独考虑靶血管的不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信